--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Economics as a science

Economics as a science:

We no longer ask the problem whether economics is an art or a science. Science is a systematized body of knowledge. Merely as physics and chemistry are sciences, economics is as well a science. We examine facts, conduct experiments and made generalizations in physics and chemistry subsequent to testing the outcomes. The similar scientific techniques are followed in economics too. Economics, like all other sciences, studies the association among cause and effect.

Sciences might be broadly classified into physical and social sciences. Physics and chemistry are illustrations of physical sciences. Economics is a social science. It studies concerning a particular aspect of human behavior. And human behavior is full of complication. It is not simple to study it. Therefore economic science is not as accurate and exact as the physical science.

However economics contains greater right to be considered as a science than other social sciences such as politics or history since in economics we make utilizations of money as a measuring rod of utility. This is true that it is only a coarse measure however still it enables us to provide concrete shape to the laws of economics. At times, what we say in economics might not come true in real life. However this is the situation with many other sciences. For illustration, we joke about weather forecasts. The weather report in the newspaper might say that there will be heavy rainfall on a specific day. However there might not be any rain at all on that specific day. On account of that, we can’t say that meteorology (i.e., the science of weather) is not a science. Likewise, when some economic laws don’t come true, we can’t say that economics is not a science.

   Related Questions in Business Economics

  • Q : Explain and give an illustration

    Explain and give an illustration of (a) the fallacy of composition; and (b) the “after this, therefore because of this” fallacy.  Why are cause-and-effect relationships difficult to isolate in the social sciences?

    		•
  • Q : Reducing output of other good When the

    When the production possibilities frontier in a proficient economy is not growing, raising the output of one good always needs: (i) Increasing the output price for the other good. (ii) Bigger amounts of resources. (iii) Decreasing the output of other

    		•
  • Q : Heterodox perspective of business

    I am facing difficulty in this question. Help me in find out correct answer of this economy based question. From heterodox perspective, why do business enterprises choose administered prices as opposed to highly flexible prices?

    		•
  • Q : What is the opportunity cost of your

    Suppose you arrive at a store expecting to pay $100 for an item, but learn that a store two miles away is charging $50 for it.  Would you drive there and buy it?  How does your decision benefit you?  What is the opportunity cost of your decision?  Now suppose you arrive at a s

    		•
  • Q : The financial investor about bonds

    Describe three ways to finance corporate activity.  Make a case that stocks are more risky for the financial investor than are bonds?

    		•
  • Q : Laissez-faire philosophy of government

    As per to the laissez-faire philosophy of government,: (1) economy works best while all investment decisions are centralized. (2) market system works best along with only minimal government intervention. (3) government must be restricted to stabilizin

    		•
  • Q : The demand curve when each of these

    What happens to the demand curve when each of these determinants changes?

    		•
  • Q : Briefly state the pros and cons of

    Briefly state the pros and cons of Proprietorship?

    		•
  • Q : Distribution of income and wealth in a

    Of the given options, the economist whose theories pivoted least upon the distribution of income and wealth (class conflict) in a capitalist system would have been: (1) Adam Smith. (2) David Ricardo. (3) Karl Marx. (4

    		•
  • Q : Determine relative price when two

    When the prices for doughnuts and croissants are $.50 and $1 correspondingly: (w) the opportunity cost for one doughnut is two croissants. (x) this is better to buy two doughnuts than one croissant. (y) one croissant will make Pierre twice as happy as one doughnut. (z

    		•