--%>

Economic questions incapability of scientific verification

Economic questions incapable of scientific verification like to correctness or falsity, as like why, how and when to prosecute and execute alleged murderers, or to whom income must be again distributed, fall in the category of: (1) positive economics. (2) negative economics. (3) neutral economics. (4) ethical economics. (5) normative economics.

Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for above economics problems.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Explain about the normative economics

    Please suggest me how to solve the problem of normative economics that is given below: Normative economics is: (w) a description of how the economy works. (x) based upon empirical studies. (y) concerned along with

  • Q : Positive declaration in positive

    When a mother tells her young child that thunder is caused by the angels bowling up in heaven, scientists would classify her statement as most clearly: (w) a normative statement. (x) a positive statement. (y) microeconomics in place of macroeconomics. (z) scientifical

  • Q : Market adjustments change equilibrium

    A movement along the demand curve for a good would be caused through changes within: (1) preferences and tastes. (2) costs for productive resources. (3) supply which change the equilibrium price of the good. (4) expectations regarding future prices.

  • Q : Explain TANSTAAFL TANSTAAFL is an

    TANSTAAFL is an acronym suggestive of that: (1) Tax agents never observe the awful influences from levies. (2) Tenants and needy must take all assets by landlords. (3) There ain't no all things like a free lunch. (4) Temperance and non satiety togethe

  • Q : Majority worse off and minority better

    When an economic change makes a huge majority of the population worse off and a minute minority better off, the alteration is: (w) good for society because it made some people better off. (x) bad for society since only a few people ar

  • Q : Efficiently distribution of goods If

    If goods are efficiently distributed in between households, then all family is: (w) sure to lose when any income redistribution arises. (x) treated equitably. (y) and also off as possible without making any other family worse off. (z) able of gaining by a better distr

  • Q : Basic economic questions NOT included

    The three basic economic questions do NOT include: (w) What?, (x) For whom?, (y) Where? and (z) How? Can someone explain me with about above problem of fundamental economic concept...

  • Q : Better off and worse off condition in

    When an economic change makes ten percent of the population better off and has no consequence on the economic welfare of the other ninety percent, in that case: (w) the community is better off. (x) the community is worse off. (y) community economic welfare does not ch

  • Q : Punishment to criminals devoid of

    The early philosopher who argued about criminals must be punished proportionally to the harm completed to society, but without consideration of remorse, intent or motive was: (1) John Stuart Mill. (2) Edwin Chadwick. (3) Jeremy Bentham. (4) Adam Smith. (5) Aristotle.<

  • Q : Explain about the term whom in

    The fundamental economic questions are "What?”, “How?”, and “For whom”? When we ask, "For whom?", we need to know who will: (w) produce the goods. (x) consume the goods. (y) get the profits. (z) decide wh