--%>

Economic Capital and Per Capita Income

Assume that half of our world’s people, arbitrarily selected, were vaporized by space aliens or teleported to the parallel universe, however no other feature of life on our Earth was influenced. Avoiding any disruptions to families or psychological trauma this calamity might cause, the average economic well being of the survivors would: (1) Rise since of enhanced efficiencies related with the divisions of labor in production. (2) Reduction as of decreased specialization and exchange according to the comparative benefit. (3) Raise as of rises in the per capita accessibility of economic capital and land. (4) be unaffected as the total value of the world production would not be influenced in a expected direction. (5) Reduction as reductions in the total human capital on Earth.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Explain statement of normative

    Please help me to solve the problem of normative economics that is given below: Normative economic hypotheses would contain the statement which: (i) Earth consist of five moons composed of blue che

  • Q : When is normative economics crucial Can

    Can anybody suggest me the appropriate explanation for given problem regarding normative economics generally. Normative economics is critical while an economist tries to: (i) predict how OPEC's refuse will influenc

  • Q : Maximization of complete value of

    Maximization of the complete value of output from a fixed amount of resources gives in: (i) Opportunity cost. (ii) Economic efficiency. (iii) Potential profitability. (iv) Comparative benefit. (v) Scarcity. How can I solve my

  • Q : Example of Relative Price Suppose a

    Suppose a deluxe hamburger is $5, an Oreo blizzard is $3, and a soda is $1. Then the relative price of the hamburger is: (a) 1.6 blizzards. (b) four sodas and half of a blizzard. (c) two blizzards. (d) a blizzard and one soda.

    Q : Current situation- better off without

    When it is possible to make somebody better off without making anybody worse off, the current condition is: (w) efficient. (x) inefficient. (y) optimal. (z) simply enhanced. How can I solve my problem of Economic Efficiency

  • Q : Driving issues in economics The driving

    The driving issues within economics are like: (w) income distribution and wealth. (x) productive inefficiency and waste. (y) restricted resources and unlimited human desires. (z) financial planning and mismanagement.

    Q : Illustrations of technological

    I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion that illustrations of technological enhancement would not comprise developing new because: (i) Lighter and less costly and stro

  • Q : Human rights trump property rights I

    I have a problem in economics on Human rights trump property rights. Please help me in the following question. Loosely translated, the laissez-faire signifies: (i) Control and integrate. (ii) Seize the day. (iii) Human rights trump the property rights

  • Q : Give an example of Production in

    By using knowledge and/or technology to apply energy to change materials, thereby making the materials more precious is: (w) production. (x) demand. (y) a total cure for scarcity. (z) economically profitable. Can someone clarify/he

  • Q : Most dealing of normative economic

    Normative economic statements deal mainly along with: (w) the way things should be. (x) production possibilities frontier analysis. (y) facts in place of theories. (z) how to measure economic variables. Please choo