--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Distribution of income in a purely competitive economy

For a specified distribution of income within a purely competitive economy, marginal social benefit will the same marginal social cost unless: (w) “hit and run” entrepreneurs prosper. (x) economic profits are zero. (y) there are externalities. (z) entrepreneurs are greedy.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Roles Play by Entrepreneurs Innovating

    Innovating new technologies and products when bearing risks and uncertainty is amongst the roles played by: (1) bureaucrats. (2) entrepreneurs. (3) monopolists. (4) politicians. (5) inventors. How can I solve my Economics <

    		•
  • Q : Illustration of monopolistic competition

    A small neighbourhood grocer in a big town mainly close approximates a: (i) pure competitor. (ii) monopolist. (iii) monopolistic competitor. (iv) oligopolist. (v) monogamist. Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some vie

    		•
  • Q : Contribution standard of income

    The contribution standard of income distribution: (w) sets the least efficient incentives for production. (x) is the distribution standard most compatible along with pure capitalism. (y) minimizes individual economic freedom. (z) is very complimented

    		•
  • Q : Example to illustrate non-tariff trade

    Imports and American cars are close nevertheless not ideal substitutes. When the U.S. government tried to boost American car sales through setting a price ceiling of P1 upon imported cars in that case: (w) the quantity of cars imported will

    		•
  • Q : Yellow dog contracts-collective

    The summation of monopolistic exploitation across all the workers tends to raise however a firm as well operates at a more communally and economically proficient level of output and employment whenever the firm is capable to engage in: (i) Black-listing in its dealing

    		•
  • Q : Emergence and development of common

    The economist most intimately identified along with the emergence and early development of common equilibrium analysis was: (w) Adam Smith. (x) Leon Walras. (y) Alfred Marshall. (z) William Stanley Jevons. Can some

    		•
  • Q : Probable quantity of the good by price

    Price discrimination which successfully increases profit does NOT needs the firm to be capable to: (1) separate the market within different groups along with different demand elasticities. (2) maintain entry barriers which defend a firm’s market

    		•
  • Q : Effects of price rise on Substitution

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The Substitution away from the good is bigger when its price increases the: (1) More close substitutes there are for good. (2) More different utilizations to which the good has been place at t

    		•
  • Q : Important of economies of scale to

    Karl Marx's prediction which competition ultimately leads to monopoly is most likely to be valid while: (w) diseconomies of scale discourage competition. (x) there are always constant returns to scale. (y) economies of scale are important relative to

    		•
  • Q : Probability of Law of Diminishing

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Karina gets 27 utils from her first ice-cream cone in an hour, and 23 extra utils from the second that hour. Determine the number of utils is she likely to obtain from the third cone? (i) 15 u

    		•