--%>

Diminishing Returns-Concave from origin

The inevitability of ultimately raising opportunity costs might be employed to explain why: (1) Scarcity is the worsening problem in industrial societies. (2) Production possibilities frontiers are concave from origin. (3) Services cost more than goods absorbing alike resources. (4) Additional units of goods cause reduction in the value of output forgone. (5) Production possibilities frontiers ‘bow in’ towards origin.

Choose the accurate one.

   Related Questions in Econometrics

  • Q : Vantage points of economists Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the following options. From the vantage points of economists, the household’s requirements are: (1) simply recognized based on the biological factors. (2) Subject to producer’s whims

  • Q : Confronting the problem of US scarcity

    The main mechanism employed in United States to confront the problem of scarcity is: (1) The market system, that relies on prices to the direct production. (2) The mixture of brute force and tradition. (3) Arbitrary selection, however queuing as well

  • Q : Expansion of the ability to produce

    Decreasing consumer goods output to generate more capital goods this year will outcome: (i) Slower growth of economy's future prolific capacity. (ii) Rapid expansion of the capability to produce in the future. (iii) No consequence on the future capaci

  • Q : Maximum output in absence of

    In the nonattendance of diminishing returns, the maximum output of food from the flower pot (or land) and limitless amounts of other resources would be sufficient to feed: (1) The grasshopper. (2) One skinny family. (3) One mouse. (4) All of the world.

    Q : Expanding the Diminishing Returns Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The law of diminishing returns refers to the rising: (1) Complexities encountered in expanding any activity continually. (2) Reductions in the costs from expanding big scale p

  • Q : Circular Flow Model-People in households

    I have a problem in economics on Circular Flow Model-People in households. Please help me in the following question. In a simple circular flow model, the ‘owners’ of all the resources are classified as: (i) Employees. (ii) Entrepreneurs. (

  • Q : Entailing the allocation of queuing The

    The allocation by queuing entails waste since some people: (i) Overstress their work credentials to acquire good jobs. (ii) May gain whereas others lose whenever lotteries are employed. (iii) Will spend long, fruitless periods waiting in line. (iv) Co

  • Q : Suitability of resources for production

    The ‘law of rising costs’ as it applies to the production possibilities frontiers is best demonstrated by: (i) Various suitability of the resources for alternative kinds of production. (ii) Inverse relationships among the price and quantit

  • Q : Problem on relative household incomes

    The most complex concepts to exemplify with a graph of a production possibilities frontier would be: (1) Associative prices and opportunity costs. (2) Productive inadequacy and unemployment. (3) Scarcity and choices. (4) Diminishing returns. (e) Assoc

  • Q : Allocative efficiency of economy The

    The economy is allocatively resourceful when the: (1) Economy is mainly based on pure socialism. (2) Growth rate is maximized since investment surpasses consumption. (3) Output mix is on production possibilities frontier and imitates what people deman