Did you see Vueling case

Did you notice the Vueling case? How is this possible that an investment bank sets the objective price of its shares in €2.50 per share upon the 2nd of October, 2007, just after replacing Vueling shares at €31 per share in June, 2007?

E

Expert

Verified

It is factual. After placing the shares of Vueling at €30 per share in December, 2006 and at €31 per share in June, 2007 and the 2nd of October, 2007 and the investment bank set the objective price at €2.5 per share.

1st December, 2006. IPO of Vueling at €30 per share. The first day, closing price was €32.99 per share.

23 February, 2007. Maximum at €46.7 per share.

6th June, 2007. Placement of the 20.97 percent of the share capital of Vueling (shares of Apax) at €31 per share.

19th July, 2007. One of the placement banks recommends the selling at the objective price at €20 per share.

August 2007. Vueling admits not being able to fulfil the business plan: that the shares fall in 30%.

31st August, 2007. New objective price of Vueling: €12 per share.

3rd October, 2007. The same placement bank values Vueling at €2.5 per share. Quotation: €8 per share.

23rd October, 2007. The bank increases the value of a share from €2.5 at €13, and this even recommends to 'selling.'

28th December, 2007. The last quotation of year 2007 is the value of share from €8.95 per share.

   Related Questions in Corporate Finance

  • Q : Explain undervaluation of share on the

    Suppose we calculate g as ROE (1–p)/(1–ROE (1–p)) and the Ke by the CAPM. We replace both values into the formula PER = (ROE (1+g) – g)/ROE (Ke-g) but there PER we obtain is fully different from the one we get by dividing the quotation of the s

  • Q : Explain breakthroughs on

    Explain breakthroughs on low-discrepancy sequences.

  • Q : Benefits of working capital requirement

    Benefits of working capital requirement estimation: • Helps to judge the efficiency of utilization of working capital in generation of sales • Cost of capital aspect

  • Q : How present value of tax shields be

    I have two valuations of the company that we set as an objective. Within one of them, the present value of tax shields (D Kd T) computed using Ku (required return to unlevered equity) and, in one, by using Kd (required return to debt). The second valuation is too high

  • Q : Who wrote famous paper- distribution of

    Who wrote famous paper of on distribution of cotton price returns?

  • Q : Operational efficiency and

    Distinguish between Operational efficiency and informational efficiency?

  • Q : Public Finance which type of tax,

    which type of tax, direct or indirect is applicable in underdeveloped countries? Why? Show your critical areas and weaknesses.

  • Q : PV of Dividends PV of dividends:

    PV of dividends: Cortez, Inc., is expecting to pay out a dividend of $2.50 next year. After that it expects its dividend to grow at 7 percent for the next four years. What is the present value of dividends over the next five-year period if the required rate of return is 10 percent?

  • Q : Problem on Yield to maturity Shawna

    Shawna desires to invest her recent bonus in a 4-year bond which pays a coupon of 11 % semi-annually. The bonds are selling at $962.13 nowadays. When she buys such bond and holds it to the maturity, what would be her yield? (Round to the nearest answer.) (i) 11.5%&nbs

  • Q : Financing EBIT problem Rusk Inc needs

    Rusk Inc needs $50 million in new capital that it might obtain by selling bonds at par with coupon of 12% or by selling stock at $40 (net) per share. The current capital structure of Rusk consists of $300 million (face value) of 10% coupon bonds selling at 90 and 10 m

©TutorsGlobe All rights reserved 2022-2023.