--%>

Describe the wave of mergers in the banking industry

Describe the wave of mergers in the banking industry?
Many economic factors have caused banking institutions to merge over the past various years. What are these factors comprise Please explain breifly...

E

Expert

Verified

• Greater efficiency. Banks frequently are able to operate more cost efficiently by increasing their size. The costs of numerous functions don't double while the scale of operation doubles. Therefore mergers are one way to keep costs and prices down.

Leveraging technology. Banks & their customers have become accustomed increasingly to the advantages of new and costly technologies. Lots of technologies are too costly unless costs can be spread over a large number of customers. Mergers are frequently necessary to allow banks to introduce & maintain the technologies customers demand increasingly.

Changing laws. Laws which had prevented several banks from operating in more than one state recently have been eliminated or overridden. The advent of interstate banking and branching means more chance for banks operating in distinct states to merge with each other.

Diversification. One effective means of controlling risks inherent in bank lending is to diversify operations across distinct geographic regions and different kind of customers. Mergers can help diversify such risks.

Broader array of products. Mergers may give banking institutions chance to offer a broader array of services. A merger of two banks along with different expertise can result in a combination more to the liking of customers looking for one-stop shopping.

 

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Price Rigidity Price Rigidity: The

    Price Rigidity: The other significant feature of oligopoly is price rigidity. Price is rigid or sticky at the prevailing level due to the fear of reaction from the rival firms. When an oligo

  • Q : Define Product Differentiation Product

    Product Differentiation: The Product differentitation is a condition when various producers under monopolistic competition, try to differentiate their product in terms of its size, shape, packaging, trade-mark and brand name. This is accomplish to att

  • Q : Consumption pattern matching demand

    A house-hold maximizes the satisfaction it derives from the given income by: (i) Buying lottery tickets to save more wealth. (ii) The consumption pattern which matches demand prices with the market prices. (iii) Consuming goods and hence every good is enjoyed uniforml

  • Q : Single monopoly in market A monopoly is

    A monopoly is a single: (w) seller of differentiated products. (x) producer of a good for that there are no close substitutes. (y) producer of a good for that there are several substitutes. (z) buyer of products into the market.

    Q : Monopolist in the product market Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. For a monopolist in a product market, the value of marginal product of the labor: (i) Equivalents the marginal revenue product of the labor

  • Q : Definition if pure monopsonist Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The pure monopsonist: (1) Is the sole buyer of a specific good or resource in the given market. (2) Can adjust just quantity and therefore is a price-taker in input market. (3)

  • Q : Demand curve at the current market price

    The demand curve faced through a purely competitive firm at the current market price of: (i) negatively sloped. (ii) horizontal. (iii) perfectly inelastic. (iv) rectangularly hyperbolic. (v) positively sloped.

    Q : Capital markets efficiency What is

    What is capital markets efficiency?

  • Q : Individual taker in pure competition

    For a particular price taker: (w) price is uninfluenced by quantity. (x) total revenue is constant. (y) profit is constant. (z) consumer surplus is zero. I need a good answer on the topic of Economics

  • Q : Union Strategies and the Taft-Hartley

    The union strategy made illegal through the Taft-Hartley Act of 1948 was: (1) Jurisdictional strikes centered on which the unions would symbolize a firm’s staff. (2) Contracts in which the firms agreed to preferentially encourage the union members. (3) ‘Ri