--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Demand curve for peanuts

Question:

a) Johnny consumes peanuts (x1) and a composite good (x2). His utility function is U = x1x2. His marginal utilities are MU1 = x2 and MU2 = x1. Johnny's budget is $20 and the price of the composite good is $1. Derive Johnny's demand function for peanuts.

b) Ambrose consumes peanuts (x1) and a composite good (x2).He has a utility functionU = 4 x1 + x2. This means his MU1 = 2/√x1 and his MU2 = 1 . The price of the composite good is p2 = 1. His budget is $20 per month. Derive Ambrose's demand function for peanuts. How does it compare with Johnny's demand curve for peanuts?

Solution:

a) U = x1x2

MRS = MU1/MU2 = x2/x1

Now, MRS = P1/P2 = P/1 = x2/x1 => x2 = 2Px1 {taking P1 = P}

Putting this value in budget equation:

Px1 + x2 = 20

  1.   Px1 + 2Px1 = 30
  2.   Px1 = 10
  3.   x1 = 10/P
  4.   x2 = 20

b) U = 4 Öx1 + x2.

MRS = MU1/ MU2 = (2/Öx1)/1 = 2/Öx1

Now, MRS = P1/P2 = P/1 = 2/Öx1

  1.   Öx1=2/P
  2.   x1 = 4/P2

Therefore, Ambrose's demand for peanuts does not depend upon his income, while Johnny's demand for peanuts does depend upon his income.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Social welfare function what do you

    what do you mean by a social welfare function? if you assume that such a function exists, what properties of social optima would be considered by you? discuss such properties.

    		•
  • Q : Introduction of marginal utility The

    The marginal utility (MU) of a good: (1) Was first introduced by Adam Smith. (2) Is simply measured in dollars. (3) Is determined by society as an entire. (4) Reflects subjective preferences. Can someone help me in getting through

    		•
  • Q : Entry of new firm in monopolistic

    Entry of new firms within a monopolistically competitive market: (1) is preventable. (2) may decrease the established firm’s production costs. (3) increases the established firm’s profits. (4) shrinks demand for a successful firm’s p

    		•
  • Q : Problem on decline of demand The

    The automakers slashed prices and gave ‘zero percent financing’ throughout the year 2001-2003 recession. An expected outcome was: (1) The decline in the demand for utilized cars. (2) enhanced maintenance of older cars by their owners. (3) Buyers purchasing

    		•
  • Q : Words of Frank Knight In words of Frank

    In words of Frank Knight, risk, not like uncertainty: (w) is totally unpredictable. (x) is a main source of pure economic profits. (y) may be estimated. (z) cannot be taken into account while firms make decisions regarding production and pricing.

    		•
  • Q : Profits predict by structure conduct

    When cost structures and market demands were identical for each of the given types of firms, in that case the structure-conduct-performance paradigm would predict the greatest profits for: (1) pure monopolist. (2) price-discriminating monopolist. (3)

    		•
  • Q : Income elasticity of demand The income

    The income elasticity of demand for mass transit of 0.6 signifies that the demand for mass transit: (1) Is a requirement. (2) Is a luxury. (3) Will increase at a slower rate than income. (4) Will drop/fall when personal incomes increases average.

    		•
  • Q : Reinforces the substitution effect For

    For normal goods which experience price changes, then the income effect: (i) Recognizes how higher money income influences demands for goods. (ii) Invalidates the diminishing marginal utility law. (iii) Offsets the substitution effect. (iv) Reinforces the substitution

    		•
  • Q : Technology and human knowledge in

    The procedure in which the technology and human knowledge are employed to apply energy to convert materials to make the materials more precious is known as: (1) Social overhead. (2) Capitalism. (3) Production. (4) Construction. (5) Profit-seeking.

    Q : Profit Maximization and the Demand for

    Each and every profit-maximizing firm which can cover its variable costs will hire the labor: (1) Just to the point of the diminishing returns. (2) Just to the point where MRP = ARP for the final worker hired. (3) Beyond the point of the diminishing r

    		•