--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Demand curve for peanuts

Question:

a) Johnny consumes peanuts (x1) and a composite good (x2). His utility function is U = x1x2. His marginal utilities are MU1 = x2 and MU2 = x1. Johnny's budget is $20 and the price of the composite good is $1. Derive Johnny's demand function for peanuts.

b) Ambrose consumes peanuts (x1) and a composite good (x2).He has a utility functionU = 4 x1 + x2. This means his MU1 = 2/√x1 and his MU2 = 1 . The price of the composite good is p2 = 1. His budget is $20 per month. Derive Ambrose's demand function for peanuts. How does it compare with Johnny's demand curve for peanuts?

Solution:

a) U = x1x2

MRS = MU1/MU2 = x2/x1

Now, MRS = P1/P2 = P/1 = x2/x1 => x2 = 2Px1 {taking P1 = P}

Putting this value in budget equation:

Px1 + x2 = 20

  1.   Px1 + 2Px1 = 30
  2.   Px1 = 10
  3.   x1 = 10/P
  4.   x2 = 20

b) U = 4 Öx1 + x2.

MRS = MU1/ MU2 = (2/Öx1)/1 = 2/Öx1

Now, MRS = P1/P2 = P/1 = 2/Öx1

  1.   Öx1=2/P
  2.   x1 = 4/P2

Therefore, Ambrose's demand for peanuts does not depend upon his income, while Johnny's demand for peanuts does depend upon his income.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Competitive resource markets and low

    When resource markets are competitive and transaction costs are low, in that case landowners: (1) pass forward completely any land tax. (2) can drive up the rental rate of land by changing its supply. (3) bear the full burden of any t

    		•
  • Q : Demand curve for Complementary Goods

    The ban on assault weapons enacted in the year 1994 lapsed in the year 2004. Prices for assault weapons fell in year 2004 since the only way to get such guns throughout the ban was via the black market. This modify in the law in year 2004 is most probable to shift the

    		•
  • Q : Problem regarding to trade barriers for

    When the import market was within equilibrium before the Japanese government began subsidizing all autos exported by the amount dg, in that case U.S. car buyers would be: (w) pay P2 for a car previouslszy priced at P0. (x) suffer Q0 to

    		•
  • Q : Subsidies on a good for buyers and

    Government subsidies on a good because of: (w) less of the good to be produced and purchased. (x) prolonged excess demands for the good. (y) buyers to pay lower prices, when sellers receive higher prices. (z) prolonged shortages of the good.

  • Q : Labor Union Goals-Minimum employment

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. When a union achieved the maximum possible hourly wage: (i) All of the members would be pleased. (ii) Employment would as well be maximized. (iii) Employment would be at minimum

    		•
  • Q : Problem regarding to trade restrictions

    When the U.S. imposes quotas which restrict imports of textiles from China, this decrease the: (w) demand for textiles within the U.S. (x) supply of Chinese textiles to Europeans. (y) supply of textiles in the U.S. (z) incomes of U.S. textile makers.

    Q : Absolute value of demand slope Since

    Since the price drop/falls and quantity demanded rises all along this demand curve for pizza, the absolute value of slope will be: (1) Is constant and elasticity falls. (2) Elasticity are constant. (3) Drop/falls and elasticity is constant. (4) Elasti

    		•
  • Q : Equality Income distribution in

    According to the equality standard of income distribution: (i) an equal distribution of income maximizes society’s economic welfare. (ii) income must be divided in proportion to need. (iii) income must be commensurate with productivity. (iv) fac

    		•
  • Q : Competitive equilibration processes

    When a purely competitive industry is within long-run equilibrium and consumer demand then raises, the short-run industry quantity supplied and equilibrium price would tend to: (w) fall. (x) rise. (y) remain similar. (z) swing up and

    		•
  • Q : Examples of pure economic rent The

    The clearest illustrations of pure economic rent are payments: (1) for improvements which increase the productivity of resources. (2) to owners of unimproved land. (3) exceeding the productivity of a resource. (4) received by owners of homogeneous res

    		•