--%>

Demand curve for peanuts

Question:

a) Johnny consumes peanuts (x1) and a composite good (x2). His utility function is U = x1x2. His marginal utilities are MU1 = x2 and MU2 = x1. Johnny's budget is $20 and the price of the composite good is $1. Derive Johnny's demand function for peanuts.

b) Ambrose consumes peanuts (x1) and a composite good (x2).He has a utility functionU = 4 x1 + x2. This means his MU1 = 2/√x1 and his MU2 = 1 . The price of the composite good is p2 = 1. His budget is $20 per month. Derive Ambrose's demand function for peanuts. How does it compare with Johnny's demand curve for peanuts?

Solution:

a) U = x1x2

MRS = MU1/MU2 = x2/x1

Now, MRS = P1/P2 = P/1 = x2/x1 => x2 = 2Px1 {taking P1 = P}

Putting this value in budget equation:

Px1 + x2 = 20

  1.   Px1 + 2Px1 = 30
  2.   Px1 = 10
  3.   x1 = 10/P
  4.   x2 = 20

b) U = 4 Öx1 + x2.

MRS = MU1/ MU2 = (2/Öx1)/1 = 2/Öx1

Now, MRS = P1/P2 = P/1 = 2/Öx1

  1.   Öx1=2/P
  2.   x1 = 4/P2

Therefore, Ambrose's demand for peanuts does not depend upon his income, while Johnny's demand for peanuts does depend upon his income.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Pure economic profit in the short run

    Monopolistically competitive firms: (w) profit by erecting durable barriers to entry and exit. (x) may realize pure economic profit in the short run, but not in the long run. (y) supply homogenous goods. (z) produce where marginal cost is at its minim

  • Q : Problem regarding analyzing persistent

    In analyzing persistent shortages within the U.S. market for adoptable children: (w) children are most reasonably considered investment goods. (x) children might reasonably be functioned as consumer goods. (y) lower prices charged adopting families would result within

  • Q : Produce a natural monopoly by market

    Market forces tend to produce a natural monopoly while: (1) decreasing costs are small relative to market demand for output. (2) diseconomies of scale are substantial at low levels of output. (3) economies of scale are substantial relative to market d

  • Q : Total revenue and total cost for firm

    Total revenue for the firm in illustrated figure is __________ __________ total cost.: (w) greater than (x) less than (y) equal to (z) Cannot be determined by the information given.

    Q : Charging price of profit-maximizing

    Hybrid Roses is the merely florist in 60 miles of Presidio, Texas. When total fixed costs (for example, rent and utilities) are $9 per hour, that profit-maximizing monopolist will charge a price of: (1) $10 per dozen roses. (2) $12 pe

  • Q : Reasonable analytic objection to land

    A reasonable analytic objection to the argument which full taxation of economic rents would not hinder allocative efficiency is about: (w) reducing income streams by rents does reduce the incentive of the resource owner to acquire the transaction cost

  • Q : Raising or lowering the price in demand

    The point on this illustrated demand curve in below at that either raising or lowering the price causes total revenue of Monsieur Cournot to decline is: (i) point a. (ii) point b. (iii) point c (iv) point d. (v) point e.

  • Q : Monopsony and Marginal Resource Costs

    The marginal resource cost for the monopsonist in labor market which can’t discriminate the wage: (1) Is perfectly inelastic. (2) Lies beneath the market supply of labor. (3) Lies above market supply of the labor. (4) Is perfectly elastic.

  • Q : Produce output by profit-maximizing

    Unless this chooses to shut down since demand never exceeds average variable costs, in that case a profit-maximizing monopolist makes output where: (i) marginal revenue equals marginal costs [MR = MC]. (ii) marginal revenue minus marg

  • Q : Legal barriers to entry Patents are

    Patents are illustrations of: (a) legal economies of substitution. (b) legal barriers to entry. (c) natural barriers to entry. (d) marginal diseconomies of scale. Can someone explain/help me with best solution about problem of