--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Demand curve for peanuts

Question:

a) Johnny consumes peanuts (x1) and a composite good (x2). His utility function is U = x1x2. His marginal utilities are MU1 = x2 and MU2 = x1. Johnny's budget is $20 and the price of the composite good is $1. Derive Johnny's demand function for peanuts.

b) Ambrose consumes peanuts (x1) and a composite good (x2).He has a utility functionU = 4 x1 + x2. This means his MU1 = 2/√x1 and his MU2 = 1 . The price of the composite good is p2 = 1. His budget is $20 per month. Derive Ambrose's demand function for peanuts. How does it compare with Johnny's demand curve for peanuts?

Solution:

a) U = x1x2

MRS = MU1/MU2 = x2/x1

Now, MRS = P1/P2 = P/1 = x2/x1 => x2 = 2Px1 {taking P1 = P}

Putting this value in budget equation:

Px1 + x2 = 20

  1.   Px1 + 2Px1 = 30
  2.   Px1 = 10
  3.   x1 = 10/P
  4.   x2 = 20

b) U = 4 Öx1 + x2.

MRS = MU1/ MU2 = (2/Öx1)/1 = 2/Öx1

Now, MRS = P1/P2 = P/1 = 2/Öx1

  1.   Öx1=2/P
  2.   x1 = 4/P2

Therefore, Ambrose's demand for peanuts does not depend upon his income, while Johnny's demand for peanuts does depend upon his income.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Difference between Collusive and

    Difference between collusive and non-collusive oligopoly. Elucidate how oligopoly firms are interdependent in taking price and output decisions.

    		•
  • Q : Problem on falling income causes

    I have a problem in economics on Problem on falling income causes increase in demand. Please help me in the following question. If falling income causes the demand for a good to rise, it is an: (1) Inferior good. (2) Costly biological necessity. (3) N

    		•
  • Q : Complication in accusation of predatory

    An accusation of predatory pricing is complicated to prove within a court of law since: (w) firms generally have too much power. (x) consumers and juries like the low prices and are less likely to fine a firm for lowering price. (y) predatory behavior

    		•
  • Q : Competitive firm shuts down in short run

    A competitive firm shuts down within the short run when: (w) this suffers a loss. (x) normal profit = 0. (y) ATC > P. (z) the minimum AVC > P. Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for above Econo

    		•
  • Q : Monopolistically competition in long

    When a monopolistically competitive firm is in long-run equilibrium, in that case this is unlikely for: (w) MR = MC. (x) P to be greater than MC. (y) P to be greater than the minimum of the long run average cost curve. (z) accounting

    		•
  • Q : Make economic profits by

    A profit-maximizing monopolist will certainly be capable to generate economic profits when, at certain level of output: (w) average fixed costs [AFC] are very high. (x) average total costs [ATC] lies above the demand curve. (y) averag

    		•
  • Q : Total costs incur by profit-maximizing

    Hybrid Roses is the merely florist in 60 miles of Presidio, Texas. When total fixed costs (for example, rent and utilities) are $9 per hour, that profit-maximizing monopolist will incur total costs of around: (w) $20 per hour. (x) $27

    		•
  • Q : Oligopoly and economic welfare in long

    In an oligopoly, as opposite to monopolistic or pure competition, industry output within the long run is probable to be: (1) lower along with reduced prices. (2) about similar but with higher prices. (3) lower and with higher prices.

    		•
  • Q : Average variable costs of pure

    Average variable costs per generic brick of this pure competitor equal approximately: (i) $.02 (2 cents per brick). (ii) $.04 (4 cents per brick). (iii) $.07 (7 cents per brick). (iv) $.09 (9 cents per brick).

  • Q : Problem on demand curve shifting right

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Soybean farming is very much competitive, and United States is the major producer. The soybean mold carried on kangaroo rat fur devastates this year’s crop. This blight is eventually lea

    		•