--%>

Define the normative economic statement

Which of the given is a normative economic statement? (1) Most Republicans favor the death penalty for murderers. (2) Punishment which is surer, swifter, and harsher decreases the rates of violent crime. (3) Most Democrats oppose the death penalty for murderers. (4) Appellate processes which reverse errors in criminal cases make sure fairness within our system of justice. (5) Capital punishment in fact reduces murder rates.

Please friends choose one choice from the above. i need your advice for the given problem in above.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Explain about the positive economic

    Positive economic statements: (1) are factual and can never be wrong. (2) predict political viewpoints. (3) are attempts to explain economic relationships. (4) estimate the fairness of social programs. (5) can resolve the matter of equity.

  • Q : When is an economic theory a positive

    Economic theory is a positive science only to the extent which this yields: (i) scientifically testable predictions. (ii) moral answers to ethical disputes. (iii) absolutely exact descriptions of how the world works. (iv) optimistic, quite than pessim

  • Q : Savings as big investment The Economic

    The Economic growth in a proficient economy will tend to increase when: (1) Capital quickly depreciates and becomes obsolete. (2) Threats of war divert resources to the national defense. (3) People’s savings increase to permit bigger investment. (4) Funds for re

  • Q : Modern sociobiologists concept

    Modern sociobiologists concept perpetuation of individual gene pool like the fundamental human drive, and give numerous illustrations of behavior which apparently conflict along with the economist's homo economicus supposition: Parents sacrifice their whole lives for

  • Q : Economist-Conclusion for redistribution

    I want a good answer on the topic of normative economics. Please give me your opinion that if wealth and income both were redistributed by the richest one to the poorest five percent of the population, conclusion of an economist would be that: (w) soc

  • Q : Explain about the Opportunity Cost in

    Opportunity cost is explained as the value of the: (w) best alternative specified for the decision made. (x) sum of all alternative choices while a decision is made. (y) monetary cost of making a decision. (z) cost incurred while one ignores alternati

  • Q : Problem regarding Property Rights Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the following options. Fee simple rights don’t comprise the right to: (1) Demolish your property. (2) Sell your property. (3) Employ your property for your own advantage. (4) Damage another’s propert

  • Q : Why is Scarcity existed for human

    Scarcity exists since human desires are: (i) minute relative to the means available to satisfy them. (ii) heavily affected by advertising and wants to “keep up along with the Joneses.” (iii) immoral. (iv) controllable merely through brainw

  • Q : Weather ruins crop-equilibrium

    When the soybean market is firstly in equilibrium on S0D0 and in that case severe weather ruins much of the crop, then the market moves to: (1) S1D0. (2) S1D2. (3) S2D0<

  • Q : Describe the scientific roles of

    Can anybody suggest me the solution for given problem regarding scientific roles of economists in economics generally. Economists, in their scientific roles: (w) hardly ever choose anything. (x) choose much of econ