--%>

Define subjective opportunity cost for the Mercedes

Can someone explain me with excellent solution about problem of economic concept of Opportunity Cost...

If you exchange your Audi for a race horse you hate, and exchange the race horse for 100 shares of gold-mine stock you believe worthless, that you then trade for a diamond ring even if you dislike jewellery, and subsequently you swap the ring for a Picasso you believe is ugly, that you exchange for the Mercedes which was your only goal within all such deals, your subjective opportunity cost for the Mercedes was your satisfaction or say enjoyment of the: (1) Picasso painting. (2) Diamond ring. (3) Shares of mining stock. (4) Race horse. (5) Audi.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Example of economic costs regarding the

    The economic costs of attending college to receive a bachelor’s degree would not comprise: (i) Potential wages earned through incoming work force right after high school. (ii) Potentially higher standards of living throughout the four years or therefore spent st

  • Q : When is an economic theory a positive

    Economic theory is a positive science only to the extent which this yields: (i) scientifically testable predictions. (ii) moral answers to ethical disputes. (iii) absolutely exact descriptions of how the world works. (iv) optimistic, quite than pessim

  • Q : LEAST relation of study of economics

    Please help me to solve the problem that is given below: The study of economics is LEAST related along with: (w) humanity in its wealth getting and wealth using activities. (x) physiological interpretations of labo

  • Q : Explain TANSTAAFL TANSTAAFL is an

    TANSTAAFL is an acronym suggestive of that: (1) Tax agents never observe the awful influences from levies. (2) Tenants and needy must take all assets by landlords. (3) There ain't no all things like a free lunch. (4) Temperance and non satiety togethe

  • Q : When is Scarcity a problem become

    Scarcity is a problem for: (w) poor countries merely. (x) individuals only when they are poor. (y) capitalists, but not socialists. (z) all people and countries, rich and poor alike. Can someone explain/help me wit

  • Q : Case of priceless in relative prices

    While people sincerely refer to something like "priceless", so they most likely mean that this is: (a) mostly meaningless to name a monetary price since its opportunity cost is more high. (b) worthless junk on that they place no value. (c) irreplaceab

  • Q : Socialism-ownership of non-human

    Can someone please help me in finding out the right answer from the following question. A faith that most of the nonhuman resources must be owned, not by the private individuals, however instead ‘by everyone’ in common, with the govt. as t

  • Q : Entry-exit of competitive firms in long

    When a typical firm in a perfectly competitive industry is earning profits, in that case: w) all firms will carry on earning profits. x) new firms will enter into the long run causing market supply to reduce, market price to rise and

  • Q : Explain statement of normative

    Please help me to solve the problem of normative economics that is given below: Normative economic hypotheses would contain the statement which: (i) Earth consist of five moons composed of blue che

  • Q : Allocative mechanisms of Economic

    Economic systems (example: capitalism versus socialism) are mainly distinguished by their relative reliance on alternative allocative mechanisms, and particularly by: (1) Who builds major economic decisions and who owns non-human resources. (ii) The level of inequalit