--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Define Size Anomaly

Size Anomaly: The size effect terms to the negative relation among security returns and the market value of the common equity of a firm. The coefficient on size has extra explanatory power than the coefficient on beta in explaining the cross section of returns. Similar to the value effect, the size effect has been reproduced for many sample periods and for most main securities markets around the world. The separately-identified value and size effects are not independent phenomena since the security characteristics all share a common variable – price per share of the firm's common stock. Certainly, researchers have illustrated a high rank correlation between size & price and between the value ratios & price, and others have documented a significant cross-sectional relation between price per share and average returns. To sort out the relative significance of the different variables, Fama and French (1992) (FF) found that B/P and Size give the greatest explanatory power in explaining the cross section of returns, and recommend that B/P and Size are proxies for the influence of two extra risk factors omitted from the CAPM.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Goal of the War on Poverty Enhancing

    Enhancing the conditions of the poor was a main goal of the War on Poverty which was launched under President: (1) Franklin Delano Roosevelt. (2) Lyndon Johnson. (3) Richard Nixon. (4) Jimmy Carter. (5) Ronald Reagan.

    Q : Exploitation on resource suppliers Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. When resource suppliers are paid less than the values of their marginal products (or VMPs), they are stated to be: (i) Monopolistic. (ii) Exploited. (iii) Monopsonistic. (iv) In equilibrium.

    		•
  • Q : Competitive Profit Maximization-average

    The purely competitive firm which hires more workers if the value of marginal product of labor increases above the competitively set wage rate will certainly experience rises in its: (1) Overhead costs. (2) Profit per unit. (3) Average variable cost. (4) Marginal reve

    		•
  • Q : Total revenue raised by output

    A firm’s total revenue can definitely be raised by decreasing its output when: (1) its supply curve is perfectly price inelastic. (2) the demand curve for its output is relatively income inelastic. (3) this is currently losing money each period.

    		•
  • Q : Certainty and severity of punishment in

    Rising the certainty and severity of punishment decreases cheating on an examination. This statement signifies: (i) Unrealistic expectations regarding student honesty. (ii) Purely normative visions of behavior. (iii) Misplaced cynicism since this issu

    		•
  • Q : Restricting output below competitive

    Below the competitive equilibrium output, restricting output will: (w) raise price above the competitive equilibrium price. (x) raise price above the marginal cost of the last unit produced. (y) generate a deadweight efficiency loss from underproducti

    		•
  • Q : Minimum Wage Laws I have a problem in

    I have a problem in economics on Minimum Wage Laws. Please help me in the following question. Minimum wage legislation has been promotes as a technique to: (i) Make sure that workers are paid beneath the subsistence salaries. (ii)  Perpetuate poverty. (iii) Maxim

    		•
  • Q : Increases profits by marginal revenue

    Assuming which marginal revenue equals $4 and marginal cost equals $5, a monopolist could raise profits by: (w) lowering both price and output. (x) increasing both price and output. (y) increasing price and decreasing output. (z) decr

    		•
  • Q : Question on demand and supply Refer to

    Refer to the following diagram. A decrease in supply is illustrated by a: A) move from point x to point y. B) shift from S1 to S2. C) shift from S2 to S1. D) move from point y to point x.

    Q : Differentiate pure competition and

    The difference among pure competition and monopolistic competition is which: (w) monopolistic competitors generate more profit in the long run. (x) monopolistic competitors always ignore short term losses. (y) long run entry and exit is probable in pu

    		•