--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Define Size Anomaly

Size Anomaly: The size effect terms to the negative relation among security returns and the market value of the common equity of a firm. The coefficient on size has extra explanatory power than the coefficient on beta in explaining the cross section of returns. Similar to the value effect, the size effect has been reproduced for many sample periods and for most main securities markets around the world. The separately-identified value and size effects are not independent phenomena since the security characteristics all share a common variable – price per share of the firm's common stock. Certainly, researchers have illustrated a high rank correlation between size & price and between the value ratios & price, and others have documented a significant cross-sectional relation between price per share and average returns. To sort out the relative significance of the different variables, Fama and French (1992) (FF) found that B/P and Size give the greatest explanatory power in explaining the cross section of returns, and recommend that B/P and Size are proxies for the influence of two extra risk factors omitted from the CAPM.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Normal accounting profit with zero

    Accounting profits are normal along with zero economic profits while there is: (1) monopoly power which has not yet been capitalized. (2) unpredicted short run surges within demand for a good. (3) uncertainty therefore unpredictable e

    		•
  • Q : Influence output price by market power

    Every firm which can considerably influence the price of its output: (i) is a pure monopoly. (ii) will be more profitable than any firm in pure competition. (iii) has market power: (iv) is essentially large relative to the market demand curve facing the firm. (v) has

    		•
  • Q : Discounted present value of future net

    A fundamental principle of finance is that the value of any of investment is: (w) the discounted present value of all future net cash flows expected by the investment. (x) negatively related to the future net cash flows generated from the investment. (y) the sum of al

    		•
  • Q : Contradiction of the law of diminishing

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Which of the following below seems the contradiction of the law of diminishing marginal utility? (1) Ken enjoys his 13th beer of the evening more than his initial. (2) Joan recognizes that her

    		•
  • Q : Changes in Bonds and Interest Rates

    When you buy a bond if the interest rate is 10% and sell this while the interest rate is 15%, in that case you will receive: (w) less than you paid for the bond. (x) more than you paid for the bond. (y) the same amount which you paid for the bond. (z)

    		•
  • Q : Equivalent marginal revenue product

    When a monopolist is maximizing its gain in the product market however consists of no monopsony power in labor market, and then it will: (1) Hire labor till marginal revenue product equivalents the average factor cost. (2) Pay a wage equivalent to the marginal revenue

    		•
  • Q : On which point demand appears to be

    On this demonstrated figure of demand curve for DVD games, demand appears to be approximately unitarily elastic at: (w) Q = O, P = $50. (x) Q = 10, P = $O. (y) Q = 5, P = $25. (z) No point on the demand curve.

    Q : Operation of profit maximizing pure

    This profit-maximizing pure competitor would stop operating within this market into the long run when the price was expected to be persistently less than the price consequent to: (i) point c. (ii) point d. (iii) point e. (iv) point f. (v) point g.

    		•
  • Q : Difficulty of competitive firms to

    Competitive firms determine this difficult to exploit consumers as: (w) consumer boycotts generate bad publicity. (x) market distributions of products are uniformly fair. (y) government price ceilings equivalent opportunity costs. (z) prices that exceed costs attract

    		•
  • Q : Flatter demand curves for goods Demand

    Demand curves tend to be flatter for goods such that: (w) are necessities than for luxury goods. (x) absorb smaller shares of family income. (y) have more close substitutes obtainable. (z) have more close complements within consumption.