--%>

Define Size Anomaly

Size Anomaly: The size effect terms to the negative relation among security returns and the market value of the common equity of a firm. The coefficient on size has extra explanatory power than the coefficient on beta in explaining the cross section of returns. Similar to the value effect, the size effect has been reproduced for many sample periods and for most main securities markets around the world. The separately-identified value and size effects are not independent phenomena since the security characteristics all share a common variable – price per share of the firm's common stock. Certainly, researchers have illustrated a high rank correlation between size & price and between the value ratios & price, and others have documented a significant cross-sectional relation between price per share and average returns. To sort out the relative significance of the different variables, Fama and French (1992) (FF) found that B/P and Size give the greatest explanatory power in explaining the cross section of returns, and recommend that B/P and Size are proxies for the influence of two extra risk factors omitted from the CAPM.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Price hike in short run I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Price hike in short run. Please help me in the following question. In short run, the demand curve for the potatoes will not be influenced by price hikes for: (i) Potatoes. (ii) Bread. (iii) Rice. (iv) Steak.

    Q : Effects of high probability of

    Since of the high probability of bankruptcy and default of a latest corporation, new corporations: (i) Encompass little trouble selling bonds. (ii) Would prefer to the issue stock. (iii) Encompass more trouble selling bonds than the established corporations. (iv) Woul

  • Q : Asymmetric Information Can someone help

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The employer who amplifies the safety of a place or prospects for advancement to the job applicants makes inefficiencies (or arguable inequities) since of: (1) Signaling. (2) Credentialism. (3

  • Q : Labor Unions-supply of workers The

    The methods unions use to raise the wages of their members do not comprise: (1) Rising the demand for the union labor. (2) Establishing higher salaries and allotting work to members. (3) Facilitating the management plans to raise productivity. (4) Raising the supply o

  • Q : Pure competition for quantity adjustment

    The only industrial structure in that all firms are pure quantity-adjusting price takers is: (1) impure oligopoly. (2) pure monopoly. (3) pure or perfect competition. (4) monopolistic competition. (5) pure oligopoly.

    Q : Monopolistic competitive firm in normal

    This monopolistically competitive firm in illustrated figure produces Q units as well as experiences: (1) economic profits equal to 0cbQ. (2) economic losses equal to cpab. (3) more than normal accounting profits. (4) marginal cost in excess of averag

  • Q : Restricting output below competitive

    Below the competitive equilibrium output, restricting output will: (w) raise price above the competitive equilibrium price. (x) raise price above the marginal cost of the last unit produced. (y) generate a deadweight efficiency loss from underproducti

  • Q : Monopsony Power-sole buyer Can someone

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The firm which is the sole buyer of a specific good or resource is the: (1) Monopsonist. (2) Conglomerate. (3) Price discriminator. (4) Plutocracy. (5) Bilateral monopolist.

  • Q : Attract aggressive competition by high

    There is substantial evidence which: (w) size alone protects modern corporations from competitive pressures. (x) big unions manipulate government more than big business does. (y) the marketplace serves business firms better than consumers. (z) high pr

  • Q : Movement according to economist Assume

    Assume that you purchased a ton of gold in Belgium for $450 per ounce and instantly sold all of it in Chile for $480 per ounce. Economists label your movement as: (i) Arbitrage. (ii) Scalping. (iii) Screening. (iv) Speculation. (v) Signaling.

    Discover Q & A

    Leading Solution Library
    Avail More Than 1448849 Solved problems, classrooms assignments, textbook's solutions, for quick Downloads
    No hassle, Instant Access
    Start Discovering

    18,76,764

    1953274
    Asked

    3,689

    Active Tutors

    1448849

    Questions
    Answered

    Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!

    Submit Assignment

    ©TutorsGlobe All rights reserved 2022-2023.