--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Define Size Anomaly

Size Anomaly: The size effect terms to the negative relation among security returns and the market value of the common equity of a firm. The coefficient on size has extra explanatory power than the coefficient on beta in explaining the cross section of returns. Similar to the value effect, the size effect has been reproduced for many sample periods and for most main securities markets around the world. The separately-identified value and size effects are not independent phenomena since the security characteristics all share a common variable – price per share of the firm's common stock. Certainly, researchers have illustrated a high rank correlation between size & price and between the value ratios & price, and others have documented a significant cross-sectional relation between price per share and average returns. To sort out the relative significance of the different variables, Fama and French (1992) (FF) found that B/P and Size give the greatest explanatory power in explaining the cross section of returns, and recommend that B/P and Size are proxies for the influence of two extra risk factors omitted from the CAPM.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Define tax Tax : It is a compulsory

    Tax: It is a compulsory payment prepared by household and firm to government.

    		•
  • Q : Influences of Ceteris Paribus The Latin

    The Latin phrase applies to the idea which all other effects on some dependent variable are to be supposed constant if examining the effect of changing a single independent variable is as: (1) Fiat justitia, ruat coelum. (2) Platea unum. (3) Unum paribus. (4) Ceteris

    		•
  • Q : Monopsony and Marginal Resource Cost

    The labor monopsonist which doesn’t wage discriminates consists of a marginal resource cost curve [or marginal factor cost curve] which is above the labor supply curve then the firm faces as: (1) Monopsonists encompass market power in the markets for output. (2)

    		•
  • Q : Linear demand curves and elasticity

    When price falls and quantity rises along a negatively-sloped linear demand curve: (1) total revenues fall till elasticity equals zero, then this rises. (2) demand is decreasingly price elastic. (3) there is a contrad

    		•
  • Q : Economic profit at profit-maximizing

    HoloIMAGine has patented a holographic technology which makes 3-D photography obtainable to consumers. When HoloIMAGine produces its profit-maximizing output, this is demonstrated as: (w) operating in the long run. (x) realizing an economic profit equ

    		•
  • Q : Example of variable in Short Run The

    The resource which a carpet manufacturer is most probable to view as the variable in short run would be: (i) The warehouse it owns (ii) Truck driver. (iii) The truck on a 5-year lease agreement. (iv) Firm’s biggest factory. C

    		•
  • Q : Problem on competitive resource market

    The firm in a perfectly competitive resource market which consists of market (monopoly) power in its output market will hire the resources to a point where: (1) w = MRP. (2) VMP = MRP. (3) w = VMP. (4) MFC = w. Can someone please h

    		•
  • Q : Substitution and elasticity of good The

    The price elasticity of demand is probable to be greater the: (1) more extensively the good is seems as a need. (2) better the obtainable alternatives for producers. (3) higher the opportunity costs of production. (4) larger the number of utilizes for

    		•
  • Q : Dilemma on labor monopsonist The labor

    The labor monopsonist will hire labor up to the point where the marginal: (i) Revenue product of the labor equivalents the wage. (ii) Resource cost of labor equivalents the salary. (iii) Revenue product of labor equivalents its marginal resource cost. (iv) Resource co

    		•
  • Q : Purely competitive decreasing cost

    When a decreasing cost industry is purely competitive in that case: (1) each firm’s long-run supply curve is downward sloping. (2) each firm encounters increasing returns to scale. (3) growth of industry output yields lower per unit costs. (4) c

    		•