--%>

Define Optimal Sample Size

Optimal Sample Size: The optimal or suitable size of sample in a survey or poll is the function of four discrete factors:

1. Size of the population: The size of the source population matters a lot. Usually, as the needed sample gets bigger the source population rises, apart from it will raise at a declining rate. Likewise, as the source population gets smaller, special adjustments have to be made.

2. Segmentations desired: Usually, we analyze the source population as an entire, however sometimes one might want to make sure it is representative of the demographic or other distributions in the source population. The more you wish for to segment the outcomes, the larger the sample might require to be.

3. Degree of variance in responses from the population: If the respondents' responses tend to be tightly clustered, then we do not require to sample as many people to acquire the same confidence as we would when the responses range broadly. However until we do some surveying and analyze the data, we won’t know the variance. In such cases, we should set a conservative assumption about the variance.

4. Tolerance for error: The more confident you want to be about the results, the larger the sample.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Buying and selling cost in monetary

    Additionally to monetary prices, there the costs of buying and selling comprise: (w) wage payments. (x) monopoly profits. (y) transaction costs. (z) social benefits. How can I solve my economics pr

  • Q : Instance of Adverse Selection Nutcake

    Nutcake Products hires new staffs devoid of revealing that the rising demand for nutcakes and partial staffing make it not possible for staffs to take their guaranteed 2-week vacations. Nut cake’s shortage of candor is most unambiguously an instance of: (1) Symm

  • Q : Slope of ray by origin in price

    The slope of the ray by the origin which is tangent to point b equivalents to: (w) the reciprocal of the price elasticity of demand. (x) P / Q. (y) 0a / 0c. (z) the price elasticity of supply.

    Q : Monopoly market structure When one firm

    When one firm controls all production and the price of a good without shut substitutes, there is: (i) monopoly market structure. (ii) violation of the law of demand and supply. (iii) lack of equity although assurance of efficiency. (iv) legal barrier to entry. (v) cer

  • Q : Relative Prices of household

    When a household consumes just x and y, a higher price of y and the stable price of x will make: (i) All goods cheaper relative to the x. (ii) x cheaper relative to the y. (iii) Real family income grow. (iv) Substitution against x the more desirable.

    Q : Make economic profits by

    A profit-maximizing monopolist will certainly be capable to generate economic profits when, at certain level of output: (w) average fixed costs [AFC] are very high. (x) average total costs [ATC] lies above the demand curve. (y) averag

  • Q : Income Distribution by Marginal

    As per the marginal productivity theory of income distribution, within a system of market capitalism, in that case income is distributed primarily in accord along with: (1) resource productivity and ownership. (2) how

  • Q : Output level of maximized profit Profit

    Profit is maximized in illustrated graph when this lumber mill produces an output level of: (1) 600 generic 2×4s daily. (2) 700 generic 2×4s daily. (3) 1500 generic 2×4s daily. (4) 1700 generic 2×4s daily. (5) 1800 generic 2&ti

  • Q : Normative objectives for microeconomic

    Extensively accepted normative objectives for microeconomic comprise: (1) full employment and balanced economic development. (2) a stable price level and maximum purchasing power. (3) efficiency, equity and freedom. (4) job security and equality within the distributio

  • Q : Earning income under negative income tax

    Under the negative income tax system demonstrated in this figure, a family of four along with earned income of $15,000 yearly would have a net [after-tax] income of: (i) $30,000 per year. (ii) $27,500 per year. (iii) $25,000 per year.