--%>

Define Keplers 1-2-3 law

Kepler's 1-2-3 law: The other formulation of Kepler's third law, that relates to the mass m of the primary to a secondary's angular velocity omega and semi major axis a:

m o = omega2 a3.

   Related Questions in Physics

  • Q : Why tea kettle sing What is the reason

    What is the reason that the tea kettle sing? Briefly state the reason.

  • Q : Define Centrifugal pseudo force

    Centrifugal pseudo force: A pseudo force which takes place whenever one is moving in uniform circular motion. One feels a "force" directed outward from the center of the motion.

  • Q : Why is heavy water employed as a

    Describe why is heavy water employed as a moderator? Illustrate.

  • Q : What do you mean by the term crest What

    What do you mean by the term crest? Briefly illustrate it.

  • Q : Explain BCS theory BCS theory -  The

    BCS theory - The theory put forth to elucidate both superconductivity and super fluidity. This suggests that in the superconducting (or super fluid) state electrons form Cooper pairs, where two electrons proceed as a single unit. This takes a non

  • Q : Weak equivalence or principle of

    Weak equivalence principle: principle of uniqueness of freefall: The idea in general relativity is that the world-line of a freefalling body is sovereign of its composition, structure, or state. This principle, hold by Newtonian mechanics and gravitat

  • Q : Physics Assignement complete assignment

    complete assignment with clear solution and explanation

  • Q : Define Noether theorem Noether theorem

    Noether theorem (Noether): A theorem that explains that symmetries are what gives rise to conserved quantities. For example, the translational symmetry (that is the fact that the laws of physics work the same in all positions) gives r

  • Q : Explain Lamberts laws or Lamberts

    What is Lamberts laws or Lamberts first law, second law and third law: Lambert's laws (J.H. Lambert) Lambert's first l

  • Q : Negative mass defect State is it

    State is it possible that the nucleus consists of negative mass defect?