--%>

Define Calendar Anomaly

Calendar Anomaly: Calendar anomalies can be defined as any irregularity or consistent pattern occurring at a regular interval or at a specific time in calendar year. Presence of these anomalies in a calendar year is the biggest threat to the concept of market efficiency as any one by observing these patterns can beat the market. Theoretically, anomalies are the result of shortfalls in the models applied for testing market efficiency rather than of inefficiency of market (Bowman, Buchanan, 1995). Calendar anomalies in the financial markets are well-documented phenomenon. Different studies have found that asset returns are dissimilar on days of the week, months of the year; turn of the month and before holidays. These empirical regularities are more pronounced in securities markets and thus have been subject to investigation in many studies. The Empirical examination of calendar anomalies in foreign exchange markets, on other hand, has been limited. However, the extant studies point out to the existence of a day-of-the-week effect in the spot rates of major currencies and also traded futures and options on such rates.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Purely competitive market at

    For a purely competitive market at any equilibrium point on the short-run supply curve: (w) all firms have identical marginal costs. (x) economic profit is positive. (y) accounting profit is normal. (z) marginal revenue = average cost.

    Q : Buyer beware-Laws and Regulations I

    I have a problem in economics on Buyer beware-Laws and Regulations. Please help me in the following question. Caveat emptor signifies: (i) Let the sellers beware. (ii) Sellers are the most excellent judges of the quality of their goods. (iii) Charge w

  • Q : Best illustration of an oligopoly The

    The best illustration of an oligopoly is: (1) guaranteed next-day delivery of packages and mail. (2) cranberry production. (3) all the local electric utility companies in New England. (4) the United Autoworkers [UAW] union. (5) Wal-Mart.

  • Q : Problem on spending shares of national

    The view which big corporations unfailingly capture much stable shares of spending out of national income is: (i) Accepted by almost all the economists. (ii) Contrary to the confirmation of turnover among big over the decades. (iii) The symptom of strong competition.

  • Q : Stockholders of a big business

    I have a problem in economics on Stockholders of a big business corporation. Please help me in the following question. The stockholders of a big business corporation: (1) Frequently manage the everyday output decisions. (2) Usually own big percentages of the total sha

  • Q : Problem on equilibrium price Refer to

    Refer to the following data. Equilibrium price will be:  A) $4. B) $3. C) $2. D) $1. Give the answer of above questaion

  • Q : Yellow Dog Contracts-non-union

    The worker who signed a yellow dog contract in the year 1920s agreed: (i) To support the union’s feather-bedding efforts. (ii) Not to work with the ‘scab’ non-union strike-breakers. (iii) To pay the union dues as protection from the violent union org

  • Q : Quantity demands equivalent quantity

    These supply and demand curves for sugar propose that the: (1) demand price exceeds the supply price at quantity Q2. (2) technology should advance to allow output to develop to Q4. (3) quantity demanded equals quantity supplied at P1.

  • Q : Product differentiation in gain

    Monopolistic competitors: (1) base decisions on the anticipated reactions of their many individual competitors. (2) can easily enter but not exit industries. (3) may sometimes act like monopolists and gain economic profits in the short run because of

  • Q : Screening and Credentialism The critics

    The critics of ‘credentialism’ suppose that firms making employment decisions tend to mainly rely too heavily on: (i) Personal contacts. (ii) Personality testing. (iii) Past experience. (iv) Job interviews. (v) Formal education and trainin