--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Define Calendar Anomaly

Calendar Anomaly: Calendar anomalies can be defined as any irregularity or consistent pattern occurring at a regular interval or at a specific time in calendar year. Presence of these anomalies in a calendar year is the biggest threat to the concept of market efficiency as any one by observing these patterns can beat the market. Theoretically, anomalies are the result of shortfalls in the models applied for testing market efficiency rather than of inefficiency of market (Bowman, Buchanan, 1995). Calendar anomalies in the financial markets are well-documented phenomenon. Different studies have found that asset returns are dissimilar on days of the week, months of the year; turn of the month and before holidays. These empirical regularities are more pronounced in securities markets and thus have been subject to investigation in many studies. The Empirical examination of calendar anomalies in foreign exchange markets, on other hand, has been limited. However, the extant studies point out to the existence of a day-of-the-week effect in the spot rates of major currencies and also traded futures and options on such rates.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Strategic Barriers to Entry The

    The successful employment of expensive marketing techniques through established competitors in an oligopoly: (w) encourages entry by other profit maximizing firms. (x) raises the minimum efficient scale of production for new entrants. (y) acts as a re

    		•
  • Q : Market clearing price problem The

    The markets in which the current market price surpasses the market clearing price experience: (1) Surpluses. (2) Declining scarcity. (3) Unexpected inventory shrinkage. (4) Shortages. (5) Raised market demands. Find out the right a

    		•
  • Q : When is Price Ceiling not create

    Price ceilings do NOT create pressures for: (w) shortages of price controlled goods. (x) black markets, queuing, or sales by favoritism. (y) opportunity costs to be lower than or else. (z) transactions at monetary prices below the equilibrium price.

    		•
  • Q : Accountability process by Handel

    Elucidate what the following statement by handel means and give an argument to either support or  oppose the contention. Things might be exist independently of our accounts, however they have no human existence  until the

    		•
  • Q : Marginal Productivity Theory about

    Differences into the demands for various resources, into the talents and kinds of labor people possess, within labor/leisure trade-offs, into inheritances, and by luck all play roles into explaining: (1) differences in income among individuals. (2) the term structure

    		•
  • Q : Initial point to identify maximizing

    Nostalgia Corporation has controlled to lock-up the rights to each black-and-white film ever made, as well as the response to its infomercials has been astounding. The initial point Nostalgia requirement to identify in its quest to maximize profit is:

    		•
  • Q : Supply of bonds for demand for loanable

    An increase in the supply of bonds tends to: (1) reduce the interest rate. (2) occur simultaneously with an increase in the demand for loanable funds. (3) yield an increase gross investment but a decrease in net investment. (4) drive up the prices of

    		•
  • Q : Average Variable Cost-Average Total

    Describe the relationship among Average Variable Cost (AVC) Average, Total Cost (ATC) and marginal Cost (MC)? Answer: A) If MC

    		•
  • Q : Business strategies in market Assume

    Assume that technological advances considerably lower costs for Honda. Hence which of the given statements is true: (w) when Honda lowers prices, rivals will rightfully accuse the firm of predatory pricing (x) when Honda raises prices, rivals will rightfully accuse th

    		•
  • Q : Legal doctrine in Laws and Regulations

    Whenever goods are non-standardized and rarely purchased by an individual, an assumption that the sellers will contain superior knowledge of the product characteristics is an argument for applying the authorized doctrine of: (1) Caveat emptor. (2) Nolo contendere. (3)

    		•