--%>

Define Calendar Anomaly

Calendar Anomaly: Calendar anomalies can be defined as any irregularity or consistent pattern occurring at a regular interval or at a specific time in calendar year. Presence of these anomalies in a calendar year is the biggest threat to the concept of market efficiency as any one by observing these patterns can beat the market. Theoretically, anomalies are the result of shortfalls in the models applied for testing market efficiency rather than of inefficiency of market (Bowman, Buchanan, 1995). Calendar anomalies in the financial markets are well-documented phenomenon. Different studies have found that asset returns are dissimilar on days of the week, months of the year; turn of the month and before holidays. These empirical regularities are more pronounced in securities markets and thus have been subject to investigation in many studies. The Empirical examination of calendar anomalies in foreign exchange markets, on other hand, has been limited. However, the extant studies point out to the existence of a day-of-the-week effect in the spot rates of major currencies and also traded futures and options on such rates.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Reducing prices due to a commodity

    Which of the given would NOT be taken as predatory behaviour: (w) Rapid technological innovation. (x) Reducing prices due to a commodity surplus. (y) Duplicative products intended to absorb shelf space. (z) Introduction of close substitutes for rivals

  • Q : Problem on Industrial Unions I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Problem on Industrial Unions. Please help me in the following question. The United Auto Workers (or UAW) is an illustration of a(n): (1) Mechanical union. (2) Company union. (3) Craft union. (4) Industrial union.

  • Q : Quantity of products in market power

    For a monopolist to raise the quantity of its products sold needs the monopolist to as: (i) raise the price of its product. (ii) charge a constant price. (iii) invest heavily in a distribution network. (iv) lower the price of its product. (v) advertis

  • Q : Estimate monthly total cost by

    When Robomatic Corporation maximizes profit within its production of RoboMaids, so its monthly total costs will be around: (i) $40 million. (ii) $65 million. (iii) $90 million. (iv) $105 million. (v) $130 million.

    Q : Nondiscriminating monopolists in short

    Within short run equilibrium, there nondiscriminating monopolists will: (w) charge prices greater than their marginal costs. (x) produce outputs which maximize social welfare. (y) produce where their total revenues are maximized. (z)

  • Q : The Debate about Welfare Programs

    Debate over U.S. welfare programs doesn’t focus onto: (w) choices in amounts and types of subsidies for health care. (x) repealing the negative income tax. (y) impacts on efficiency and incentives. (z) social conflicts over redistribution of inc

  • Q : Transfer payments and progressive tax

    Transfer payments and progressive tax policies are being determinate to: (w) reduce disparities in the distributions of income and wealth. (x) shift the Lorenz curve toward a position of less income equality. (y) have no net effect on income equality

  • Q : Effect of higher price for normal good

    Let consider the law of demand. The idea that the higher price for a normal good will outcome in less of good being purchased never based logically on the: (1) Income effect, by which the higher price decreases the purchasing power of the income. (2) Demand for good f

  • Q : Purely and monopolistically competitive

    Purely competitive markets and monopolistically competitive markets have in general: (1) the collusive tendencies of large rival firms. (2) extensive negotiations about prices among buyers and sellers. (3) freedom of entry and exit wi

  • Q : Corporations stockholders not liable

    The corporation’s stockholders are not personally liable for the debts of firm since: (1) The Corporation is considered as a legal person, separate from its owner. (2) Usually there are too many stockholders to try to hold them all accountable. (3) In a corporat