decreasing marginal returns and negative marginal returns
What is the difference between decreasing marginal returns and negative marginal returns?
The profit-maximizing firm which is perfectly competitive in resource market however that consists of market power in output market will hire labor at the point where: (1) VMP=MRP=MFC>w. (2) VMP>MRP=MFC=w. (3) VMP = MRP = MFC = w. (4) VMP>MRP
The slope of the ray by the origin which is tangent to point b equivalents to: (w) the reciprocal of the price elasticity of demand. (x) P / Q. (y) 0a / 0c. (z) the price elasticity of supply. Q : Purely competitive price takers and Different from Firm D, Firms A and B as well as C are all: (w) profitable firms that enjoys significant market power. (x) purely-competitive price-takers and quantity-adjusters. (y) pure monopolies. (z) perfectly inelastic suppliers. Q : Exhibiting Predatory Behavior If a firm If a firm attempts to drive rivals from its market and after that raises prices and adopts a strategy to deter entry, this is exhibiting: (w) grim strategy. (x) tit-for-tat strategy. (y) predatory behavior. (z) Nash equilibrium. Q : Economic of short-run shuts down firm When a firm shuts down within the short run, in that case it’s economic: (w) profit is zero. (x) resources have zero opportunity cost. (y) loss equals its fixed cost. (z) value to shareholders rises. Please guys help to solve
Different from Firm D, Firms A and B as well as C are all: (w) profitable firms that enjoys significant market power. (x) purely-competitive price-takers and quantity-adjusters. (y) pure monopolies. (z) perfectly inelastic suppliers. Q : Exhibiting Predatory Behavior If a firm If a firm attempts to drive rivals from its market and after that raises prices and adopts a strategy to deter entry, this is exhibiting: (w) grim strategy. (x) tit-for-tat strategy. (y) predatory behavior. (z) Nash equilibrium. Q : Economic of short-run shuts down firm When a firm shuts down within the short run, in that case it’s economic: (w) profit is zero. (x) resources have zero opportunity cost. (y) loss equals its fixed cost. (z) value to shareholders rises. Please guys help to solve
If a firm attempts to drive rivals from its market and after that raises prices and adopts a strategy to deter entry, this is exhibiting: (w) grim strategy. (x) tit-for-tat strategy. (y) predatory behavior. (z) Nash equilibrium. Q : Economic of short-run shuts down firm When a firm shuts down within the short run, in that case it’s economic: (w) profit is zero. (x) resources have zero opportunity cost. (y) loss equals its fixed cost. (z) value to shareholders rises. Please guys help to solve
When a firm shuts down within the short run, in that case it’s economic: (w) profit is zero. (x) resources have zero opportunity cost. (y) loss equals its fixed cost. (z) value to shareholders rises. Please guys help to solve
Conditions of producers equilibrium: The conditions of producers equilibrium through the marginal cost and marginal revenue approach are as follows. 1. Marginal cost should be equal to marginal revenue.
Please, describe me what lexicographic is and its application also.
Assume that the market for a good is initially in equilibrium, and then the govt. places a subsidy on good. The probable result would be: (i) Raised production and purchases of good. (ii) That buyers would pay big prices for the good. (iii) Extended scarcity of the go
Prices cross elasticity of demand of two between cable TV and VCRs entails that such goods are: (1) complementary goods. (2) substitute goods. (3) negatively associated goods. (4) a luxury and a need, respectively. (5) both inferior goods.
When consumers eventually cannot distinguish one roasted chicken dinner from other, while roasted chicken dinners are produced into a constant cost industry, and when no barriers to entry or exit exist, so this firm’s lo
18,76,764
1944489 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1456809
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!