Critics of the simple limit pricing strategy

Critics of the straightforward limit pricing strategy argue about that: (w) sunk costs are not important in deterring entry. (x) for limit pricing to work, there should be a credible threat to keep old output levels. (y) this is rational to expect the incumbent firm to keep old output levels after entry of a competitor. (z) a binding agreement to continue to keep old output levels will lessen the likelihood of a limit pricing strategy to be successful.

Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem of Economics that is given above.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Long run equilibrium for purely

    When a purely competitive industry is into long run equilibrium, in that case for the typical firm: (a) P = FC = TC = MC = MR = AR = AC. (b) P = AR = MR = SRMC = SRAC = LRMC = LRAC. (c) pure economic profits reward especially effectiv

  • Q : Reduce total revenue when demand is

    Boosting the price for Pixie’s cheesy fried grits by P2 to P3 will: (w) increases total revenue since demand within inelastic. (x) increase total revenue since demand is elastic. (y) reduce total revenue since demand is inelastic. (z) reduce total revenue since demand

  • Q : Purely competitive industry in long run

    When a purely competitive industry is into long run equilibrium, in that case the total: (w) costs of all the firms’ combined outputs are minimized. (x) revenues of the industry are maximized. (y) welfare of society is at its mi

  • Q : Monopsonistic exploitation of many

    NCAA rules the forbidding standard employment negotiations among colleges and amateur athletes tend to outcome in: (i) Monopsonistic exploitation of numerous athletes. (ii) Incentives for the collusion among individual college coaches and individual owners of the prof

  • Q : Marginal revenue at monopolist

    At the quantity where a demand of monopolist is unitarily elastic, so marginal revenue is: (1) positive. (2) negative. (3) one. (4) zero. (5) infinite. Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem of

  • Q : Law of supply regarding firms I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Law of supply regarding firms. Please help me in the following question. The law of supply signifies that: (i) Firms provide less for sale at lower prices. (ii) Purchases and prices differ inversely. (iii) Minimum inve

  • Q : Negatively relative interest rate

    Interest rates tend to be negatively associated to: (w) household preferences for more liquid assets. (x) typical rates of return on alternative investments. (y) household willingness to delay consumption. (z) investor optimism concerning rates of ret

  • Q : Process of Capitalization

    Capitalization is a process: (a) that converts fixed cost into variable cost. (b) by which predictable income flows are translated into wealth. (c) of financial intermediation by bankers. (d) of exploiting unskilled workers.

    Q : Relation between Implicit Costs and

    I have a problem in economics on Relation between Implicit Costs and Opportunity costs. Please help me in the following question. The Implicit costs are: (1) Opportunity costs. (2) Always variable costs. (3) Similar as the accounting costs. (4) Similar as the explicit

  • Q : Point of hiring labor for profit

    The entire profit maximizing firm will hire additional labor up to the point where the: (i) Average physical product of the labor equivalents the nominal wage. (ii) Last unit of labor adds equally to net revenue and net cost. (iii) Marginal product of the labor is at

©TutorsGlobe All rights reserved 2022-2023.