--%>

Crime punishment suggest by Jeremy Bentham

Suggestion of Jeremy Bentham that crime must be punished proportionally to the harm completed to society, but without consideration of intent, remorse or motive.” His proposal would result within more than the optimal amount of crime due to the: (w) harmful effects of crime upon the distribution of income according to the contribution standard. (x) unavailability of prisons within the late 18th century. (y) inequality in the distribution of income which characterized the early stages of the industrial revolution (z) probability of punishment being less than hundred present.

Please choose the right answer from above...I want your suggestion for the same.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Illustration of Economic Equilibrium

    After drivers shift among traffic lanes to exit by a crowded airport till this seems reasonable to expect all exit lines to be similarly time-consuming, economists exemplify the result like an illustration of economic: (i) Equilibrium. (ii) Balance. (iii) Tradeoffs. (

  • Q : Technological advances in Production

    Movements all along the production possibilities curve would not replicate: (1) Technological advances. (2) A society’s choice-making among alternative output combinations. (3) The limiting factor of scarcity in output choices. (4) Opportunity c

  • Q : Where is Positive theory inaccurate Can

    Can anybody suggest me the proper description for given problem regarding positive theory in Economics generally. Positive theory which is inaccurate: (w) can be disproved through logic and fact. (x) includes poor

  • Q : Illustrate an example of Efficiency in

    Bobby Joe Bob owns a hog feed factory within Los Angeles, CA. Oddly adequate, there is not a large market for hog feed within L.A. Bobby Joe Bob moves his operation to a minute, backwards town termed as The Sticks, NC, where a huge market for hog feed awaits him. That

  • Q : Better off and worse off condition in

    When an economic change creates one person better off and a thousand persons worse off, this is: (w) good for society. (x) bad for society. (y) neither good nor bad for society. (z) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

  • Q : Where is economic efficiency for

    Economic efficiency for society does not need that such: (w) the greatest possible satisfaction is enjoyed through all consumers specified their individual budgets. (x) maximum possible value of output from obtainable resources. (y) exact goods are us

  • Q : Problem of macroeconomics in economics

    Can anybody advise me the proper explanation for given problem regarding macroeconomics in Economics generally. In macroeconomics, where we examine all things like the: (w) problems of What, How, and For Whom. (x)

  • Q : Explain about the positive economic

    Positive economic statements: (1) are factual and can never be wrong. (2) predict political viewpoints. (3) are attempts to explain economic relationships. (4) estimate the fairness of social programs. (5) can resolve the matter of equity.

  • Q : Hypothesis included by normative

    Please help me to solve the problem of hypothesis in normative statements in normative economics that is given below: Normative statements would consist of the hypothesis which: (v) Abuse of alcohol lowers GPAs. (w

  • Q : The closest illustration of a free good

    Which would be the closest illustration of a free good: (1) A can of tuna bought along with food stamps, (2) dead leaves which require raking into fall, (3) water through a drinking fountain at a park, (4) a sample of soap acquired in the mail and (5)