--%>

Cooperative and non-cooperative outcome

Question:

Cineplex and AMC are two rival movie theatre chains. They must each decide whether to set an admission price of $10 or set an admission price of $12; of course, the number of movie goers (and thus their revenues) will depend both on the price they set as well as the price charged by their competitor. Their profit levels are given in the matrix below.

 

Cineplex

$10

$12

 

AMC

$10

(7,7)

(8*,8*)

$12

(6,8)

(7,7)

a) If AMC and Cineplex could cooperate, which set of actions would generate the highest industry profit? Is that outcome likely to be achievable?

Answer:

If both firms cooperate, then AMC will charge $10 and Cineplex will charge $12. This maximizes there and also the industry profits. Also, this is the most likely outcome in the market as for AMC charging $10 is the dominant strategy, regardless of what Cineplex charges. Given this strategy of AMC, charging $12 is the best strategy for Cineplex.

b) What is AMC's best action(s)? Does it depend on Cineplex's action?

Answer:

As discussed above, AMC's best action is to charge $10, regardless of what Cineplex charges. Therefore, this is also AMC's dominant strategy.

c) What is Cineplex's best action(s)? Does it depend on AMC's move?

Answer:

If AMC charges $10, then Cineplex's best action is to charge $12 as it maximizes its profits. If AMC charges $12, then Cineplex's best strategy is to charge $10, as it maximizes its profits. As we see, Cineplex's best actions are dependent upon AMC's moves.

d) If Cineplex and AMC cannot cooperate, what outcome(s) would occur? Is there a difference between the cooperative and non-cooperative outcome?

Answer:

The Nash equilibrium in this game is the same as the cooperative and non-cooperative outcome , i.e., AMC charges $10 and Cineplex charges $12. This is because of the fact that this optimizes both firms' profits.

   Related Questions in Business Economics

  • Q : Explain the cause of Trade barriers

    Explain the cause of Trade barriers?

  • Q : How government might manipulate its

    Explain how government might manipulate its expenditures and tax revenues to reduce unemployment?

  • Q : Regression Your firm is worried about

    Your firm is worried about being sued for gender discrimination. There is a growing perception that males are being paid more than females in your department. Using the data in the SALARY tab in the Excel file provided, please complete the following using a = .05 a). Do the men appear to earn mo

  • Q : Who define economics as a subset of

    Economists who viewed economics like a subset of jurisprudence combined: (1) John Stuart Mill. (2) Alfred Marshall. (3) Karl Marx. (4) William Stanley Jevons. (5) Adam Smith. Hey friends please give your opinion fo

  • Q : Variation of wages in inverse proportion

    This wages vary within inverse proportion to the agreeableness and constancy of the employment was a perception first explicitly stated through: (i) Adam Smith. (ii) Karl Marx. (iii) Thomas Malthus. (iv) John Stuart Mill. (v) David Ricardo.

  • Q : Organization identify the reasons for

    identify the reasons for the formation of organizations

  • Q : Example of public goods Drinking at a

    Drinking at a public water fountain is: (w) a public good because anyone may drink from it. (x) results in a negative externality because others can’t drink from this at similar time. (y) a positive externality because you are benefiting by other’s provisi

  • Q : Invisible hand Describe the meaning of

    Describe the meaning of the term “invisible hand.”

  • Q : Fixed or managed exchange rate

    Question: A country with a fixed or managed exchange rate would consider i.___________________ its currency to gain competitive advantage vis-à-vis its trade

  • Q : Problem on prisoners dilemma game Lets

    Lets assume an infinitely repeated prisoner’s dilemma game by two players. The resulting payoffs at each phase by the actions of two players are illustrated below in the table (payoffs are symbolized like (payoff for player 1, payoff for player 2)). Two players