--%>

Cooperative and non-cooperative outcome

Question:

Cineplex and AMC are two rival movie theatre chains. They must each decide whether to set an admission price of $10 or set an admission price of $12; of course, the number of movie goers (and thus their revenues) will depend both on the price they set as well as the price charged by their competitor. Their profit levels are given in the matrix below.

 

Cineplex

$10

$12

 

AMC

$10

(7,7)

(8*,8*)

$12

(6,8)

(7,7)

a) If AMC and Cineplex could cooperate, which set of actions would generate the highest industry profit? Is that outcome likely to be achievable?

Answer:

If both firms cooperate, then AMC will charge $10 and Cineplex will charge $12. This maximizes there and also the industry profits. Also, this is the most likely outcome in the market as for AMC charging $10 is the dominant strategy, regardless of what Cineplex charges. Given this strategy of AMC, charging $12 is the best strategy for Cineplex.

b) What is AMC's best action(s)? Does it depend on Cineplex's action?

Answer:

As discussed above, AMC's best action is to charge $10, regardless of what Cineplex charges. Therefore, this is also AMC's dominant strategy.

c) What is Cineplex's best action(s)? Does it depend on AMC's move?

Answer:

If AMC charges $10, then Cineplex's best action is to charge $12 as it maximizes its profits. If AMC charges $12, then Cineplex's best strategy is to charge $10, as it maximizes its profits. As we see, Cineplex's best actions are dependent upon AMC's moves.

d) If Cineplex and AMC cannot cooperate, what outcome(s) would occur? Is there a difference between the cooperative and non-cooperative outcome?

Answer:

The Nash equilibrium in this game is the same as the cooperative and non-cooperative outcome , i.e., AMC charges $10 and Cineplex charges $12. This is because of the fact that this optimizes both firms' profits.

   Related Questions in Business Economics

  • Q : What are the determinants of supply

    What are the determinants of supply?

  • Q : Determine the productively efficiency

    To be productively efficient, a country should: (w) maximize the satisfaction attainable from its budget. (x) be concerned only with macroeconomic analysis. (y) concentrate on removing scarcity. (z) maximize the value of output produced through specif

  • Q : Calculate Equilibrium Quantity and Price

    1. The owner of a firm calculates that next year's profit will be $1,000. Each successive year profit will increase by 10% (i.e. year 2: $1100; year 3: $1210 and so on.) At the end of the 5th year the firm could be sold for $20,000. A) if the appropriate di

  • Q : Variation of wages in inverse proportion

    This wages vary within inverse proportion to the agreeableness and constancy of the employment was a perception first explicitly stated through: (i) Adam Smith. (ii) Karl Marx. (iii) Thomas Malthus. (iv) John Stuart Mill. (v) David Ricardo.

  • Q : Illustrate the Goals of Mixed Economy

    Illustrate the Goals of Mixed Economy?

  • Q : Gross domestic product Question Would

    Question Would "Victory Points" be a measure of player's "GDP"? If not, then how would you calculate a player's GDP?

  • Q : Government policies with respect to the

    Can you explain how different government policies with respect to the recycling of aluminum and paper might account for these different market outcomes?

  • Q : Define Direct and inverse relationships

    Define Direct and inverse relationships?

  • Q : What is the opportunity cost of your

    Suppose you arrive at a store expecting to pay $100 for an item, but learn that a store two miles away is charging $50 for it.  Would you drive there and buy it?  How does your decision benefit you?  What is the opportunity cost of your decision?  Now suppose you arrive at a s

  • Q : Barter - Efficiency and the Gains from

    Relative to other systems, economies in that people exchange goods or resources directly along with other people for other goods or resources without using money like a usual denominator rely relatively heavily upon: (i) barter. (ii) specialization. (