--%>

Cooperative and non-cooperative outcome

Question:

Cineplex and AMC are two rival movie theatre chains. They must each decide whether to set an admission price of $10 or set an admission price of $12; of course, the number of movie goers (and thus their revenues) will depend both on the price they set as well as the price charged by their competitor. Their profit levels are given in the matrix below.

 

Cineplex

$10

$12

 

AMC

$10

(7,7)

(8*,8*)

$12

(6,8)

(7,7)

a) If AMC and Cineplex could cooperate, which set of actions would generate the highest industry profit? Is that outcome likely to be achievable?

Answer:

If both firms cooperate, then AMC will charge $10 and Cineplex will charge $12. This maximizes there and also the industry profits. Also, this is the most likely outcome in the market as for AMC charging $10 is the dominant strategy, regardless of what Cineplex charges. Given this strategy of AMC, charging $12 is the best strategy for Cineplex.

b) What is AMC's best action(s)? Does it depend on Cineplex's action?

Answer:

As discussed above, AMC's best action is to charge $10, regardless of what Cineplex charges. Therefore, this is also AMC's dominant strategy.

c) What is Cineplex's best action(s)? Does it depend on AMC's move?

Answer:

If AMC charges $10, then Cineplex's best action is to charge $12 as it maximizes its profits. If AMC charges $12, then Cineplex's best strategy is to charge $10, as it maximizes its profits. As we see, Cineplex's best actions are dependent upon AMC's moves.

d) If Cineplex and AMC cannot cooperate, what outcome(s) would occur? Is there a difference between the cooperative and non-cooperative outcome?

Answer:

The Nash equilibrium in this game is the same as the cooperative and non-cooperative outcome , i.e., AMC charges $10 and Cineplex charges $12. This is because of the fact that this optimizes both firms' profits.

   Related Questions in Business Economics

  • Q : Regulate prices to ensure against

    Not between exact activities for government to undertake, according to Adam Smith, would be for the government to: (1) maintain public institutions and public works. (2) protect society by invasion. (3) serves as a medium for law and justice. (4) regu

  • Q : Fixed or managed exchange rate

    Question: A country with a fixed or managed exchange rate would consider i.___________________ its currency to gain competitive advantage vis-à-vis its trade

  • Q : Negatively association to probability

    Adam Smith would have agreed mostly along with the concept which wages are: (i) positively associated to physical comfort when working. (ii) negatively related to the cost of learning the business. (iii) positively associated to the s

  • Q : Ambrose’s budget constraint Question:

    Question: Ambrose consumes two goods, peanuts (x1 ) and a composite good (x2). He has a utility functionU = 4 √x1 + x2. This means his MU1 = 2/ √x1 an

  • Q : Problem on utility function Matt’s life

    Matt’s life is divided into two time periods, young and old, and his utility is a function of two “goods”:  consumption when young and consumption whenever old.  Consumption when young and consumption when old are both of normal goods to Ma

  • Q : Change in supply and a change in the

    Distinguish between a change in supply and a change in the quantity supplied?

  • Q : Subjective aspects of pricing- economic

    Adam Smith must have emphasized more strongly how his Wealth of Nations drew concepts and inspiration by Richard Cantillon’s Essai. Now today’s perspective that the Wealth of Nations would considered even

  • Q : Describe the Functional distribution of

    Describe the Functional distribution of income?

  • Q : Write short note on Markets Write short

    Write short note on Markets?

  • Q : Problem on prisoners dilemma game Lets

    Lets assume an infinitely repeated prisoner’s dilemma game by two players. The resulting payoffs at each phase by the actions of two players are illustrated below in the table (payoffs are symbolized like (payoff for player 1, payoff for player 2)). Two players