--%>

Cooperative and non-cooperative outcome

Question:

Cineplex and AMC are two rival movie theatre chains. They must each decide whether to set an admission price of $10 or set an admission price of $12; of course, the number of movie goers (and thus their revenues) will depend both on the price they set as well as the price charged by their competitor. Their profit levels are given in the matrix below.

 

Cineplex

$10

$12

 

AMC

$10

(7,7)

(8*,8*)

$12

(6,8)

(7,7)

a) If AMC and Cineplex could cooperate, which set of actions would generate the highest industry profit? Is that outcome likely to be achievable?

Answer:

If both firms cooperate, then AMC will charge $10 and Cineplex will charge $12. This maximizes there and also the industry profits. Also, this is the most likely outcome in the market as for AMC charging $10 is the dominant strategy, regardless of what Cineplex charges. Given this strategy of AMC, charging $12 is the best strategy for Cineplex.

b) What is AMC's best action(s)? Does it depend on Cineplex's action?

Answer:

As discussed above, AMC's best action is to charge $10, regardless of what Cineplex charges. Therefore, this is also AMC's dominant strategy.

c) What is Cineplex's best action(s)? Does it depend on AMC's move?

Answer:

If AMC charges $10, then Cineplex's best action is to charge $12 as it maximizes its profits. If AMC charges $12, then Cineplex's best strategy is to charge $10, as it maximizes its profits. As we see, Cineplex's best actions are dependent upon AMC's moves.

d) If Cineplex and AMC cannot cooperate, what outcome(s) would occur? Is there a difference between the cooperative and non-cooperative outcome?

Answer:

The Nash equilibrium in this game is the same as the cooperative and non-cooperative outcome , i.e., AMC charges $10 and Cineplex charges $12. This is because of the fact that this optimizes both firms' profits.

   Related Questions in Business Economics

  • Q : Illustrate the Comparative advantage

    Illustrate the Comparative advantage and terms of trade?

  • Q : Prices are the automatic regulator

    “Prices are the automatic regulator that tends to keep production and consumption in line with each other.”  Explain.

  • Q : Production function for the game

    Question Can you describe what the production function for the game looks like? (How are labour, capital and resources combined? Are there constant, increasing or decreasing returns to scale?) Answer

    Q : Internal factors which influencing the

    Write down the internal factors which influencing the capital structure?

  • Q : An Inquiry in the Nature and Causes The

    The first comprehensive work upon economics written within English was authored through Adam Smith in 1776 year and entitled that “An Inquiry within the Nature and Causes of: (1) Laws of Supply and Demand.” (2) Wealth of Nations.” (3

  • Q : Variation of wages in inverse proportion

    This wages vary within inverse proportion to the agreeableness and constancy of the employment was a perception first explicitly stated through: (i) Adam Smith. (ii) Karl Marx. (iii) Thomas Malthus. (iv) John Stuart Mill. (v) David Ricardo.

  • Q : Market Apparent program For the

    For the question below, utilize the given information. The market for gizmos is competitive, with an increasing sloping supply curve and a downward sloping demand curve. With no govt. intervention, the equilibrium price is $25 and the equilibrium quantity is 10,000 gi

  • Q : Negatively association to probability

    Adam Smith would have agreed mostly along with the concept which wages are: (i) positively associated to physical comfort when working. (ii) negatively related to the cost of learning the business. (iii) positively associated to the s

  • Q : Absolute advantage in international

    One early involvement of Adam Smith to the theory of gains by international trade, although later thoroughly revised and refined through David Ricardo, was the conception of: (1) mercantilism. (2) absolute advantage. (3) comparative a

  • Q : Gains from the Exchange Even people who

    Even people who are extremely good at everything couldn’t encompass: (i) absolute benefits in approximately everything. (ii) Much higher incomes than average. (iii) Comparative benefits in everything. (iv) Superior natural endowments of talent.

    Discover Q & A

    Leading Solution Library
    Avail More Than 1454100 Solved problems, classrooms assignments, textbook's solutions, for quick Downloads
    No hassle, Instant Access
    Start Discovering

    18,76,764

    1949220
    Asked

    3,689

    Active Tutors

    1454100

    Questions
    Answered

    Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!

    Submit Assignment

    ©TutorsGlobe All rights reserved 2022-2023.