--%>

Cooperative and non-cooperative outcome

Question:

Cineplex and AMC are two rival movie theatre chains. They must each decide whether to set an admission price of $10 or set an admission price of $12; of course, the number of movie goers (and thus their revenues) will depend both on the price they set as well as the price charged by their competitor. Their profit levels are given in the matrix below.

 

Cineplex

$10

$12

 

AMC

$10

(7,7)

(8*,8*)

$12

(6,8)

(7,7)

a) If AMC and Cineplex could cooperate, which set of actions would generate the highest industry profit? Is that outcome likely to be achievable?

Answer:

If both firms cooperate, then AMC will charge $10 and Cineplex will charge $12. This maximizes there and also the industry profits. Also, this is the most likely outcome in the market as for AMC charging $10 is the dominant strategy, regardless of what Cineplex charges. Given this strategy of AMC, charging $12 is the best strategy for Cineplex.

b) What is AMC's best action(s)? Does it depend on Cineplex's action?

Answer:

As discussed above, AMC's best action is to charge $10, regardless of what Cineplex charges. Therefore, this is also AMC's dominant strategy.

c) What is Cineplex's best action(s)? Does it depend on AMC's move?

Answer:

If AMC charges $10, then Cineplex's best action is to charge $12 as it maximizes its profits. If AMC charges $12, then Cineplex's best strategy is to charge $10, as it maximizes its profits. As we see, Cineplex's best actions are dependent upon AMC's moves.

d) If Cineplex and AMC cannot cooperate, what outcome(s) would occur? Is there a difference between the cooperative and non-cooperative outcome?

Answer:

The Nash equilibrium in this game is the same as the cooperative and non-cooperative outcome , i.e., AMC charges $10 and Cineplex charges $12. This is because of the fact that this optimizes both firms' profits.

   Related Questions in Business Economics

  • Q : Define condition when one gain unless

    When no one can gain unless someone else loses, in that case current arrangements are: (w) economically efficient. (x) not optimal. (y) inequitable. (z) the best cure for scarcity. Can someone explain/help me with best solution abo

  • Q : Problem on utility function Matt’s life

    Matt’s life is divided into two time periods, young and old, and his utility is a function of two “goods”:  consumption when young and consumption whenever old.  Consumption when young and consumption when old are both of normal goods to Ma

  • Q : How can we calculate Price earnings

    How can we calculate Price earnings ratio?

  • Q : Illustrate Measuring unemployment

    Illustrate Measuring unemployment?

  • Q : Initial systematic and popular

    The initial systematic and popular description of capitalism was explained in: (1) Sir Thomas Mun’s England’s Treasure by Foreign Trade. (2) Joseph A. Schumpeter’s Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. (3) John Maynard Keynes’

  • Q : Why businesses are not really free to

    Why businesses are not really “free” to produce what they wish?

  • Q : Mixed Economy Define the term Mixed

    Define the term Mixed Economy and also state their advantages and disadvantages?

  • Q : Consumer and producer surplus in the

    In perfectly competitive market, the market demand and market supply curves are provided by Qd = 1000 −10Pd and Qd = 30Ps. Assume that the government gives a subsidy of $20 per unit to each and every seller in the mark

  • Q : Basic supply determinants of other than

    Illustrate the 6 basic supply determinants of other than price?

  • Q : Least probability of competitive market

    The competitive market system is least probable to be allocatively unproductive as a result of: (w) externalities and public goods. (x) cutthroat competition and the outsourcing of low-wage jobs to less grown countries. (y) the underproduction of a go