--%>

Cooperative and non-cooperative outcome

Question:

Cineplex and AMC are two rival movie theatre chains. They must each decide whether to set an admission price of $10 or set an admission price of $12; of course, the number of movie goers (and thus their revenues) will depend both on the price they set as well as the price charged by their competitor. Their profit levels are given in the matrix below.

 

Cineplex

$10

$12

 

AMC

$10

(7,7)

(8*,8*)

$12

(6,8)

(7,7)

a) If AMC and Cineplex could cooperate, which set of actions would generate the highest industry profit? Is that outcome likely to be achievable?

Answer:

If both firms cooperate, then AMC will charge $10 and Cineplex will charge $12. This maximizes there and also the industry profits. Also, this is the most likely outcome in the market as for AMC charging $10 is the dominant strategy, regardless of what Cineplex charges. Given this strategy of AMC, charging $12 is the best strategy for Cineplex.

b) What is AMC's best action(s)? Does it depend on Cineplex's action?

Answer:

As discussed above, AMC's best action is to charge $10, regardless of what Cineplex charges. Therefore, this is also AMC's dominant strategy.

c) What is Cineplex's best action(s)? Does it depend on AMC's move?

Answer:

If AMC charges $10, then Cineplex's best action is to charge $12 as it maximizes its profits. If AMC charges $12, then Cineplex's best strategy is to charge $10, as it maximizes its profits. As we see, Cineplex's best actions are dependent upon AMC's moves.

d) If Cineplex and AMC cannot cooperate, what outcome(s) would occur? Is there a difference between the cooperative and non-cooperative outcome?

Answer:

The Nash equilibrium in this game is the same as the cooperative and non-cooperative outcome , i.e., AMC charges $10 and Cineplex charges $12. This is because of the fact that this optimizes both firms' profits.

   Related Questions in Business Economics

  • Q : Explanation of theory of pricing for

    The theory of pricing for particular goods explained in Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations is most consistent along with: (1) mercantilist doctrine. (2) Richard Cantillon’s distinction between “value in

  • Q : Eco Quantity TR TC 0 $0.00 $10.00 1

    Quantity TR TC 0 $0.00 $10.00 1 $150.00 $30.00 2 $290.00 $50.00 3 $420.00 $80.00 4 $540.00 $120.00 5 $650.00 $170.00 6 $750.00 $230.00 7 $840.00 $300.00 8 $920.00 $

  • Q : Describe the duty of bondholders in a

    Describe the duty of bondholders in a bond?

  • Q : Numbers of sellers in pure competition?

    numbers of sellers in pure competition?

  • Q : What is the opportunity cost of your

    Suppose you arrive at a store expecting to pay $100 for an item, but learn that a store two miles away is charging $50 for it.  Would you drive there and buy it?  How does your decision benefit you?  What is the opportunity cost of your decision?  Now suppose you arrive at a s

  • Q : Next Generation Manufacturing Strategy

    This Assignment assesses the following module Learning Outcomes:1. Describe current production concepts and techniques in formulating a manufacturing strategy.2. Discuss the development and implementation of manufacturing strategies in the busi

  • Q : Definition of Full Employment

    Definition of “Full Employment”?

  • Q : Perfect competition leads the economic

    The perfectly competitive market structure benefits consumers since: w) firms do not generate goods at the lowest possible price within the long run. x) firms are forced through competitive pressure to be as efficient as possible. y) firms add a much

  • Q : Economic sense production methods

    Evaluate and explain the statements: “In the economic sense production methods are the most efficient methods, once resource prices are considered and are lesser in sense of engineering”.

  • Q : Describe redistributive effects of

    Describe redistributive effects of inflation?