--%>

Cooperative and non-cooperative outcome

Question:

Cineplex and AMC are two rival movie theatre chains. They must each decide whether to set an admission price of $10 or set an admission price of $12; of course, the number of movie goers (and thus their revenues) will depend both on the price they set as well as the price charged by their competitor. Their profit levels are given in the matrix below.

 

Cineplex

$10

$12

 

AMC

$10

(7,7)

(8*,8*)

$12

(6,8)

(7,7)

a) If AMC and Cineplex could cooperate, which set of actions would generate the highest industry profit? Is that outcome likely to be achievable?

Answer:

If both firms cooperate, then AMC will charge $10 and Cineplex will charge $12. This maximizes there and also the industry profits. Also, this is the most likely outcome in the market as for AMC charging $10 is the dominant strategy, regardless of what Cineplex charges. Given this strategy of AMC, charging $12 is the best strategy for Cineplex.

b) What is AMC's best action(s)? Does it depend on Cineplex's action?

Answer:

As discussed above, AMC's best action is to charge $10, regardless of what Cineplex charges. Therefore, this is also AMC's dominant strategy.

c) What is Cineplex's best action(s)? Does it depend on AMC's move?

Answer:

If AMC charges $10, then Cineplex's best action is to charge $12 as it maximizes its profits. If AMC charges $12, then Cineplex's best strategy is to charge $10, as it maximizes its profits. As we see, Cineplex's best actions are dependent upon AMC's moves.

d) If Cineplex and AMC cannot cooperate, what outcome(s) would occur? Is there a difference between the cooperative and non-cooperative outcome?

Answer:

The Nash equilibrium in this game is the same as the cooperative and non-cooperative outcome , i.e., AMC charges $10 and Cineplex charges $12. This is because of the fact that this optimizes both firms' profits.

   Related Questions in Business Economics

  • Q : Inefficiencies and inequities by

    An employer that exaggerates the safety of a position or the prospects for advancement to job applicants makes inefficiencies as well as arguable inequities due to: (1) signaling. (2) credentialism. (3) screening. (4) adverse selection. (5) a moral hazard.

  • Q : Define the term Abstractions in

    Define the term Abstractions in economics?

  • Q : Write short note on Demand Write short

    Write short note on Demand, Supply and Equilibrium?

  • Q : Exchange and Specialization I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Exchange and Specialization. Please help me in getting the right answer from the following question. Sarah the wheat farmer would be most probable to trade for fruit from the Kathy's orchard if: (i) Sarah's opportunity

  • Q : Demand Q X= 600- 6PX + 20I +0.4PY c.

    Q X= 600- 6PX + 20I +0.4PY c. Suppose PX increases by 10%, by what percentage would sales decrease? Explain how this price increase affect total revenues from good X.

  • Q : Self-interested motivation to underpin

    Adam Smith’s perception which self-interested motives underpin even charitable activities through apparently selfless people appeared originally into his primary major book that was entitled: (1) Theory of Moral Sentiments [1755]. (2) Leviathan

  • Q : Illustrate the advantage and

    Illustrate the advantage and disadvantage of Corporations?

  • Q : Examples and Applications of

    What are the Examples and Applications of International Trade?

  • Q : Prices are the automatic regulator

    “Prices are the automatic regulator that tends to keep production and consumption in line with each other.”  Explain.

  • Q : Utility with food coupons Question: In

    Question: In Vancouver the Salvation Army encourages people to make food voucher donations to panhandlers instead of simply giving them cash. You can buy a food voucher for $5 and give it to a panhandler who can use it to purchase food. The Sa