--%>

Computers playing games

How Computers playing games can be categorized according to different dimensions?

E

Expert

Verified

Computers playing games:

Competing against each other in the form of a game is nothing new. Egyptians and Chinese have archived games which date back to far before the year zero. Games can be categorized according to different dimensions. Three examples are:

(1) the number of players,

(2) whether chance is involved, and

(3) how many information a player has.

With the upcoming of computers human beings were tempted to let the computer play those games. The reason why scientists are interested in research on board games is that the rules of games are mostly exact and well defined which makes it easy to translate them to a program that is suitable for a computer to run (Van den Herik, 1983). The research in board games obtained a huge impulse in 1944 when Von Neumann republished his article about the minimax algorithm (Von Neumann, 1928) together with Morgenstern in the book “Theory of Games and Economic Behavior” (Von Neumann and Morgenstern, 1944). These ideas were picked up by Shannon (1950) and Turing (1953) who tried to let a computer play Chess as intelligently as possible. Since then much research is performed on new methods, on a variety of games (Murray, 1952) and on other problems to make the computer a worthy opponent for the human player (Schaeffer and Van den Herik, 2002). One field in this area of research are the board games which have full information and are played by two persons. Chess is the classical example of this kind of a game and a great deal of effort has been devoted in the past to the construction of a good chess player. The most pregnant success so far in this area was the result when Deep Blue achieved to win against world chess champion Garry Kasparov (Newborn, 1996).

   Related Questions in Basic Statistics

  • Q : Statistics for Management Assignment

    Q : Statics for each of the following

    for each of the following studies a and b decide whether to reject the null hypothesis that groiups come from identical populations. Use the .01 level. (c) Figure the effects size for each study. (d) ADVANCED TOPIC: Carry out an analysis of variance for study (a) using the strucurtal method.

  • Q : Get Solved LP Problems Solve Linear

    Solve Linear Programming Questions A producer manufactures 3 models (I, II and III) of a particular product. He uses 2 raw materials A and B of which 4000 and 6000 units respectively are obtainable. The raw materials per unit of 3

  • Q : Designing a system What are the

    What are the questions that comes into mind when designing a system?

  • Q : Cumulative Frequency and Relative

    Explain differences between Cumulative Frequency and Relative Frequency?

  • Q : Simplified demonstration of Littles Law

    Simplified demonstration of Little’s Law:

    Q : Decision Variables Determine Decision

    Determine Decision Variables: Let X1 be the number of private homes to be inspectedLet X2 be the number of office buildings to be inspect

  • Q : Average think time Software monitor

    Software monitor data for an interactive system shows a CPU utilization of 75%, a 3 second CPU service demand, a response time of 15 seconds, and 10 active users. Determine the average think time of these users?

  • Q : Write out the null hypothesis 1.

    1. (AAC/ACA c9q1).  For each of the following studies, decide whether you can reject the null hypothesis that the groups come from identical populations. Use the alpha = .05 level.1a.

  • Q : Define Service Demand Law

    Service Demand Law:• Dk = SKVK, Average time spent by a typical request obtaining service from resource k• DK = (ρk/X

  • ©TutorsGlobe All rights reserved 2022-2023.