--%>

Computers playing games

How Computers playing games can be categorized according to different dimensions?

E

Expert

Verified

Computers playing games:

Competing against each other in the form of a game is nothing new. Egyptians and Chinese have archived games which date back to far before the year zero. Games can be categorized according to different dimensions. Three examples are:

(1) the number of players,

(2) whether chance is involved, and

(3) how many information a player has.

With the upcoming of computers human beings were tempted to let the computer play those games. The reason why scientists are interested in research on board games is that the rules of games are mostly exact and well defined which makes it easy to translate them to a program that is suitable for a computer to run (Van den Herik, 1983). The research in board games obtained a huge impulse in 1944 when Von Neumann republished his article about the minimax algorithm (Von Neumann, 1928) together with Morgenstern in the book “Theory of Games and Economic Behavior” (Von Neumann and Morgenstern, 1944). These ideas were picked up by Shannon (1950) and Turing (1953) who tried to let a computer play Chess as intelligently as possible. Since then much research is performed on new methods, on a variety of games (Murray, 1952) and on other problems to make the computer a worthy opponent for the human player (Schaeffer and Van den Herik, 2002). One field in this area of research are the board games which have full information and are played by two persons. Chess is the classical example of this kind of a game and a great deal of effort has been devoted in the past to the construction of a good chess player. The most pregnant success so far in this area was the result when Deep Blue achieved to win against world chess champion Garry Kasparov (Newborn, 1996).

   Related Questions in Basic Statistics

  • Q : MANOVA and Reflection Activity

    Activity 10:   MANOVA and Reflection   4Comparison of Multiple Outcome Variables This activity introduces you to a very common technique - MANOVA. MANOVA is simply an extension of an ANOV

  • Q : Define Service Demand Law

    Service Demand Law:• Dk = SKVK, Average time spent by a typical request obtaining service from resource k• DK = (ρk/X

  • Q : How to solve statistics assignment in

    How to solve staistics assignment, i need some help in solving stats assignment on AVOVA based problems. Could you help in solving this?

  • Q : Safety and Liveness in Model Checking

    Safety and Liveness in Model Checking Approach; •? Safety: Nothing bad happens •? Liveness: Something good happens •? Model checking is especially good at verifying safety and liveness properties    –?Concurrency i

  • Q : Help An experiment is conducted in

    An experiment is conducted in which 60 participants each fill out a personality test, but not according to the way they see themselves. Instead, 20 are randomly assigned to fill it out according to the way they think a parent sees them (i.e. how a parent would fill it out to describe the participant

  • Q : Computers playing games How Computers

    How Computers playing games can be categorized according to different dimensions?

  • Q : Cumulative Frequency and Relative

    Explain differences between Cumulative Frequency and Relative Frequency?

  • Q : Decision Variables Determine Decision

    Determine Decision Variables: Let X1 be the number of private homes to be inspectedLet X2 be the number of office buildings to be inspect

  • Q : OIL I need to product when oil will

    I need to product when oil will finish time (by years) for 6 countries if the keep their production (per day) in the same level. So, the 6 countries have fixed reserves and production 1. statistics for Bahrain Crude oil reserves (million barrels) = 124.6 be careful in million Crude oil producti

  • Q : Average think time Software monitor

    Software monitor data for an interactive system shows a CPU utilization of 75%, a 3 second CPU service demand, a response time of 15 seconds, and 10 active users. Determine the average think time of these users?