--%>

Computers playing games

How Computers playing games can be categorized according to different dimensions?

E

Expert

Verified

Computers playing games:

Competing against each other in the form of a game is nothing new. Egyptians and Chinese have archived games which date back to far before the year zero. Games can be categorized according to different dimensions. Three examples are:

(1) the number of players,

(2) whether chance is involved, and

(3) how many information a player has.

With the upcoming of computers human beings were tempted to let the computer play those games. The reason why scientists are interested in research on board games is that the rules of games are mostly exact and well defined which makes it easy to translate them to a program that is suitable for a computer to run (Van den Herik, 1983). The research in board games obtained a huge impulse in 1944 when Von Neumann republished his article about the minimax algorithm (Von Neumann, 1928) together with Morgenstern in the book “Theory of Games and Economic Behavior” (Von Neumann and Morgenstern, 1944). These ideas were picked up by Shannon (1950) and Turing (1953) who tried to let a computer play Chess as intelligently as possible. Since then much research is performed on new methods, on a variety of games (Murray, 1952) and on other problems to make the computer a worthy opponent for the human player (Schaeffer and Van den Herik, 2002). One field in this area of research are the board games which have full information and are played by two persons. Chess is the classical example of this kind of a game and a great deal of effort has been devoted in the past to the construction of a good chess player. The most pregnant success so far in this area was the result when Deep Blue achieved to win against world chess champion Garry Kasparov (Newborn, 1996).

   Related Questions in Basic Statistics

  • Q : Safety and Liveness in Model Checking

    Safety and Liveness in Model Checking Approach; •? Safety: Nothing bad happens •? Liveness: Something good happens •? Model checking is especially good at verifying safety and liveness properties    –?Concurrency i

  • Q : Problem on queuing diagram Draw a 

    Draw a queuing diagram for the systems below and describe them using Kendall’s notation: A) Single CPU system <

  • Q : What is Inter-arrival times

    Inter-arrival times:A) Requests arrive randomly, often separated by small time intervals with few long separations among themB) The time until the next arrival is independent of when the last arrival occurredC) Coro

  • Q : Stats The College Board SAT college

    The College Board SAT college entrance exam consists of three parts: math, writing and critical reading (The World Almanac 2012). Sample data showing the math and writing scores for a sample of twelve students who took the SAT follow. http://west.cengagenow.com/ilrn/books/assb12h/images/webfiles/

  • Q : Designing a system What are the

    What are the questions that comes into mind when designing a system?

  • Q : Explain Queuing theory Queuing theory :

    Queuing theory: • Queuing theory deals with the analysis of lines where customers wait to receive a service:

    Q : Variance and standard error A hospital

    A hospital treated 412 skin cancer patients over a year. Of these, 197 were female. Give the point estimate of the proportion of females seeking treatment for skin cancer. Give estimates of the

  • Q : Use the NW corner rule to find an

      (a) Use the NW corner rule to find an initial BFS, then solve using the transportation simplex method. Indicate your optimal objective function value. (b) Suppose we increase s1 from 15 to 16, and d3 from 10 to 11. S

  • Q : Building Models Building Models • What

    Building Models • What do we need to know to build a model?– For model checking we need to specify behavior • Consider a simple vending machine – A custome rinserts coins, selects a beverage and receives a can of soda &bul

  • Q : Hw An experiment is conducted in which

    An experiment is conducted in which 60 participants each fill out a personality test, but not according to the way they see themselves. Instead, 20 are randomly assigned to fill it out according to the way they think a parent sees them (i.e. how a parent would fill it out to describe the participant