--%>

Computers playing games

How Computers playing games can be categorized according to different dimensions?

E

Expert

Verified

Computers playing games:

Competing against each other in the form of a game is nothing new. Egyptians and Chinese have archived games which date back to far before the year zero. Games can be categorized according to different dimensions. Three examples are:

(1) the number of players,

(2) whether chance is involved, and

(3) how many information a player has.

With the upcoming of computers human beings were tempted to let the computer play those games. The reason why scientists are interested in research on board games is that the rules of games are mostly exact and well defined which makes it easy to translate them to a program that is suitable for a computer to run (Van den Herik, 1983). The research in board games obtained a huge impulse in 1944 when Von Neumann republished his article about the minimax algorithm (Von Neumann, 1928) together with Morgenstern in the book “Theory of Games and Economic Behavior” (Von Neumann and Morgenstern, 1944). These ideas were picked up by Shannon (1950) and Turing (1953) who tried to let a computer play Chess as intelligently as possible. Since then much research is performed on new methods, on a variety of games (Murray, 1952) and on other problems to make the computer a worthy opponent for the human player (Schaeffer and Van den Herik, 2002). One field in this area of research are the board games which have full information and are played by two persons. Chess is the classical example of this kind of a game and a great deal of effort has been devoted in the past to the construction of a good chess player. The most pregnant success so far in this area was the result when Deep Blue achieved to win against world chess champion Garry Kasparov (Newborn, 1996).

   Related Questions in Basic Statistics

  • Q : Hypothesis homework A sample of 9 days

    A sample of 9 days over the past six months showed that a clinic treated the following numbers of patients: 24, 26, 21, 17, 16, 23, 27, 18, and 25. If the number of patients seen per day is normally distributed, would an analysis of these sample data provide evidence that the variance in the numbe

  • Q : Building Models Building Models • What

    Building Models • What do we need to know to build a model?– For model checking we need to specify behavior • Consider a simple vending machine – A custome rinserts coins, selects a beverage and receives a can of soda &bul

  • Q : Principles of data analysis For the

    For the data analysis project, you will address some questions that interest you with the statistical methodology we are learning in class. You choose the questions; you decide how to collect data; you do the analyses. The questions can address almost any topic,

  • Q : Cumulative Frequency and Relative

    Explain differences between Cumulative Frequency and Relative Frequency?

  • Q : Compare the test results The grade

    The grade point averages of 61 students who completed a college course in financial accounting have a standard deviation of .790. The grade point averages of 17 students who dropped out of the same course have a standard deviation of .940. Do the data indicate a

  • Q : Compute two sample standard deviations

    Consider the following data for two independent random samples taken from two normal populations. Sample 1 14 26 20 16 14 18 Sample 2 18 16 8 12 16 14 a) Com

  • Q : Designing a system What are the

    What are the questions that comes into mind when designing a system?

  • Q : Model Checking Approach Model Checking

    Model Checking Approach: • Specify program model and exhaustively evaluate that model against a speci?cation        –Check that properties hold   

  • Q : Safety and Liveness in Model Checking

    Safety and Liveness in Model Checking Approach; •? Safety: Nothing bad happens •? Liveness: Something good happens •? Model checking is especially good at verifying safety and liveness properties    –?Concurrency i

  • Q : What is Interactive Response Time Law

    Interactive Response Time Law: • R = (L/X) - Z• Applies to closed systems.• Z is the think time. The time elapsed since&nb