--%>

Complication in accusation of predatory pricing

An accusation of predatory pricing is complicated to prove within a court of law since: (w) firms generally have too much power. (x) consumers and juries like the low prices and are less likely to fine a firm for lowering price. (y) predatory behavior can be complex to distinguish from normal competition. (z) rivals are afraid to bring the matter to court.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Complete equilibrium by distribution of

    When the economy was in a complete equilibrium, in that case the distribution of income would be precisely proportional to the distribution of: (a) taxation. (b) inheritance. (c) luck. (d) wealth.

  • Q : Influence output price by market power

    Every firm which can considerably influence the price of its output: (i) is a pure monopoly. (ii) will be more profitable than any firm in pure competition. (iii) has market power: (iv) is essentially large relative to the market demand curve facing the firm. (v) has

  • Q : Opportunity Costs to Society of Funding

    The clearest signals of the opportunity costs to society of funding one investment in place of another are relative: (w) interest rates, expected rates of return, and also expected economic profit. (x) production costs for various goo

  • Q : Price elasticity of demand and

    When the price elasticity of demand for Japanese cars is higher within Europe than into the U.S. and transportation costs are very similar, relative to the price charged in Europe, there the price a discriminating Japanese carmaker wo

  • Q : Greatest strategy for maximizing profit

    Monsieur Cournot contains a monopoly on an artesian well from that flows tasty spring water reputed to have medicinal properties. To ignore incurring any variable costs, he is adamants that customers bring their own pails also fill th

  • Q : Problem on greatest monopsony power The

    The Employers would have the maximum monopsony power in dealing with: (i) White collar labor in the metropolitan area. (ii) Unionized workers. (iii) Professional athletes. (iv) Blue collar labor in metropolitan area.

    Q : Competitive Prices for selling This

    This purely-competitive producer’s generic bricks presently sell for: (i) $60 per thousand. (ii) $70 per thousand. (iii) $80 per thousand. (iv) $90 per thousand. (v) $100 per thousand.

    Q : Diminishing Marginal utility principle

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The experience that your very first kiss with a latest crush was more thrilling and satisfying than your 10th kiss 35 minutes later is an illustration of the: (i) Familiarity principle. (ii) N

  • Q : Graphical explanation of production

    The production possibilities frontier graphically demonstrates the: (i) Production limitations which confront the society. (ii) Benefits inherent in the capitalistic economy. (iii) Social selections available if technology is boundless. (iv) Structura

  • Q : Wage Rates and Marginal Resource Costs

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. When a firm is the price taker in labor market and the salary is $80 per day, then the marginal resource cost incurred if hiring 20 more workers per day is as: (i) $1600. (ii) $