--%>

Complication in accusation of predatory pricing

An accusation of predatory pricing is complicated to prove within a court of law since: (w) firms generally have too much power. (x) consumers and juries like the low prices and are less likely to fine a firm for lowering price. (y) predatory behavior can be complex to distinguish from normal competition. (z) rivals are afraid to bring the matter to court.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Break-even level of income under

    For a family of four the break-even level of income under the negative income tax system demonstrated in this figure is: (1) $15,000 per year. (2) $30,000 per year. (3) $45,000 per year. (4) $60,000 per year. (5) $75,000 per year.

  • Q : Occurrence of increase in supply in

    In short run, the increase in supply takes place whenever the: (1) Supply curve shifts upward and to left. (2) Preferences of consumers change in a positive direction. (3) Market price raise. (4) Amounts producers make accessible rise at each and every price. (5) Publ

  • Q : Derived Demand Can someone help me in

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Demands for the productive resources are eventually ‘derived’ from the: (i) marginal utility they directly produce. (ii) Demands for the consumer services and goods. (iii) Disutili

  • Q : Cost structure characteristic in purely

    When Cling Peach Orchards has a cost structure characteristic of peach orchards into this purely competitive industry, when the long run new competitors would most likely enter the market providing the wholesale price per bushel of peaches exceeded: (

  • Q : Adverse Selection example Can someone

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The car dealer never proposed to honor a guarantee on a utilized car, providing an illustration of: (1) Moral hazard. (2) Economic dishonesty. (3) Price discrimination. (4) Mark

  • Q : Price consistent with profit-maximizing

    HoloIMAGine has patented a holographic technology which creates 3-D photography obtainable to consumers. So the price consistent along with HoloIMAGine's profit-maximizing output would be of: (1) price P1. (2) price P2. (3) price

  • Q : Capital Goods In the above diagram, the

    In the above diagram, the elimination of discrimination is best represented by

  • Q : Estimate income elasticity of demand

    When Y = income, that is the income elasticity of demand is approximately measured when the value of: (i) (% change in Q) / (% change in Y). (ii) ratio of the slopes of demand relative to supply. (iii) (% change in Q) / (% change in P). (iv) constant

  • Q : Kinked Demand by decreasing price In

    In this kinked demand curve model as in given graph, when this firm operated at point a and lowered its price by P2 to P1 and other firms in the industry also lower prices, in that case this firm will move from point a to: (w) po

  • Q : Purchasing ratio maximizing the total

    The consumer who spends income and hence the ratio of MUs of all goods purchased equivalents the ratio of their prices is: (i) Maximizing net utility. (ii) Spending too much. (iii) Beyond the point of diminishing negative utility. (iv) Behaving incompatibly through pu