--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Complication in accusation of predatory pricing

An accusation of predatory pricing is complicated to prove within a court of law since: (w) firms generally have too much power. (x) consumers and juries like the low prices and are less likely to fine a firm for lowering price. (y) predatory behavior can be complex to distinguish from normal competition. (z) rivals are afraid to bring the matter to court.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem on free market economy A) Using

    A) Using appropriate tables and diagrams explain how price and quantity is determined in a free market economy. B) Briefly explain using the diagrams in 4.1 the followings two scenarios C) When

    		•
  • Q : Monopolistic and competitive tools in

    Most markets into the American economy are: (i) purely competitive. (ii) primarily unregulated monopolies. (iii) blends of monopolistic and competitive tools. (iv) dominated by regulated monopolies. (v) governed through the decisions of political lead

    		•
  • Q : Production costs-Consumer Sovereignty I

    I have a problem in economics on Production costs-Consumer Sovereignty. Please help me in the following question. In the market economy, output patterns mainly reflect: (i) Individual votes by each and every consumer. (ii) The requirements of majority

    		•
  • Q : Calculating accounting profits The firm

    The firm has $70,000 in implicit costs, and the economic profit of $40,000. This firm’s: (i) Explicit cost equivalent $30,000. (ii) Accounting profits equivalent $110,000. (iii) Normal gain equivalents $40,000. (iv) Explicit costs equivalent $110,000.

  • Q : Purely competitive industry in the long

    For a purely competitive industry in the long run: (i) several firms exit therefore others may earn more than normal profits. (ii) established firms reap higher profits than newer firms. (iii) all resources are fixed for the industry as an entire. (iv

    		•
  • Q : Evidence of Diminishing Marginal Utility

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The law of diminishing marginal utility might be evidenced by the person: (i) Smoking more however enjoying each and every extra cigarette less. (ii) Buying a latest car after

    		•
  • Q : Question based on GDP In calculating

    In calculating the GDP national income accountants: A) treat inventory changes as an adjustment to personal consumption expenditures. B) ignore inventories because they do not represent final goods. C) subtract increases in inventories or add decreases in inventories.

    		•
  • Q : Supply of money The multiple by which

    The multiple by which the commercial banking system can increase the supply of money on the basis of each dollar of excess reserves is equal to: A) the reciprocal of the legal reserve ratio. B) 1 minus the legal reserve ratio. C) the reciprocal of the income velocit

    		•
  • Q : Risk and Uncertainty In word of Frank

    In word of Frank Knight, risk: (w) exists when the probability of any specified event can be predicted. (x) appeals to the gambler personalities of innovators who next in social progress. (y) is irrelevant to good calculates of the economic costs of p

    		•
  • Q : Assumption of Ceteris paribus Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Suppose that everything except the variables we are studying remains constant or steady is termed as the: (1) Ceteris paribus assumption. (2) Ex-ante assumption. (3) Ex-post assumption. (4) Po

    		•