--%>

Competitive resource markets and low transaction costs

When resource markets are competitive and transaction costs are low, in that case landowners: (1) pass forward completely any land tax. (2) can drive up the rental rate of land by changing its supply. (3) bear the full burden of any tax on pure economic rent by land. (4) would change their behavior substantially if a 50 percent pure land tax were imposed. (5) can and will totally pass forward any property tax.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Increase profit of cartel-member A

    A member of a cartel would be probably to increase its profits by: (1) undercutting the prices of other cartel members when this did not get caught. (2) setting its price above which of other cartel members. (3) aggressive nonprice marketing promotion

  • Q : Analytic time and profit maximization

    Firm A in below illustration of figure maximizes profit and is: (1) demonstrated as operating in the long run. (2) capable of reaping economic profit of P2P1de, since only in the short run. (3) incurring economic losses equivalent to fixed costs of P3

  • Q : Equilibrium in the long run This would

    This would be a fallacy to suppose that: (w) a purely competitive firm’s demand curve is perfectly elastic. (x) a purely competitive firm’s supply curve is the marginal cost above the minimum point of the AVC. (y) purely competitive firms generate where MR

  • Q : Examples of Labor

    The contracts needing employment after some worker’s jobs have been made obsolete through automation are illustrations of: (i) Blacklisting. (ii) Labor-reducing protectionism. (iii) Check-off provisions. (iv) Yellow dog contracts. (v) Feather-bedding.

  • Q : Problem on Monopsonistic exploitation I

    I have a problem in economics on Monopsonistic exploitation. Please help me in the following question. The Monopsonistic exploitation of labor signifies that the: (i) Influenced workers receive much low wages. (ii) Firm reaps big economic gains by exploiting the worke

  • Q : Demand in a specific period In adding

    In adding up to price, the quantity of a good bought throughout a given period is recognized by: (1) Income. (2) Tastes and preferences. (3) Numbers of buyers in market. (4) Prices of associated goods. (e) All of above. Can someone

  • Q : Determine inferior good by income

    As in below figure demonstrates how consumption of goods A, B, C, and D varies like a family’s income changes. Of such goods, the only inferior good: (w) good A. (x) good B  (y) good C. (z) good D.

  • Q : Critics of contribution standard of

    Critics of contribution standard of the income distribution often: (w) cite inequality as evidence of inequity. (x) assert which private individuals must not be capable to accumulate any assets. (y) believe charitable giving should be

  • Q : Determinants of Demand-Change in price

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Demand curve for the DVD players would not be shifted by the change in price of: (1) Downloaded music. (2) CD players. (3) Compact disks. (4) DVD players.

  • Q : Standard economic reasoning for price

    In the given figure as in below, demand curve D0D0: (w) has price elasticity of infinity. (x) is possibly for a luxury good. (y) is unitarily price elastic. (z) seems contrary to standard economic reasoning.

    Discover Q & A

    Leading Solution Library
    Avail More Than 1461652 Solved problems, classrooms assignments, textbook's solutions, for quick Downloads
    No hassle, Instant Access
    Start Discovering

    18,76,764

    1942229
    Asked

    3,689

    Active Tutors

    1461652

    Questions
    Answered

    Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!

    Submit Assignment

    ©TutorsGlobe All rights reserved 2022-2023.