--%>

Competitive advertising as waste of resources

Economists have conventionally concluded which, from the vantage point of society as an entire, competitive advertising in that case: (1) enables consumers to make more efficient economic choices. (2) is a waste of resources. (3) considerably decreases transaction costs. (4) tends to reduce prices and dampen inflationary pressure. (5) is more efficient than cooperative advertising.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Operating in state-Right-to-Work Laws

    When it is illegal to necessitate union membership as a condition of employment for firm, then the firm: (1) Needs all the employees to sign the yellow dog contracts. (2) Can’t sign an agency shop agreement with the union. (3) Can need settlement before workers

  • Q : Income elasticity of demand The income

    The income elasticity of demand for mass transit of 0.6 signifies that the demand for mass transit: (1) Is a requirement. (2) Is a luxury. (3) Will increase at a slower rate than income. (4) Will drop/fall when personal incomes increases average.

  • Q : Elastic and Inelastic demand An

    An increase in the price of goods, outcomes in an increase in expenses on it. This demand is elastic or inelastic? Answer: Inelastic since there is direct relation

  • Q : Calls of negative income tax Negative

    Negative income tax proposals call for: (w) paying $1 in taxes on every dollar of transfer payments. (x) reducing welfare benefits by levying higher income taxes. (y) instituting consistent work incentives for welfare recipients. (z) establishing a ne

  • Q : Increasing-cost industries average

    Within increasing-cost industries average there are: (w) production costs fall as output increases. (x) production costs rise as the number of firms in the industry grows. (y) production costs rise when the number of firms into the industry falls. (z)

  • Q : Low-income elasticities of demand

    Placing an excise tax upon goods along with low-income elasticities of demand will share out the tax burden as: (1) proportionally between high-income and low-income households. (2) disproportionately on high-income households. (3) disproportionately

  • Q : Illustration of a strategic barrier An

    An illustration of a strategic barrier would be a: (w) high-technology firm registering a patent on their newly-designed time machine. (x) law establishing the USPS as the only mail service in the United States. (y) set of costly advertising campaigns

  • Q : Split roughly burden of tax The burden

    The burden of an excise (i.e., per unit) tax would be divide roughly fifty by fifty on consumers and suppliers of the taxed good within: (w) Panel A. (x) Panel B. (y) Panel C. (z) Panel D.

  • Q : Problem on Analysis Paralysis Consumers

    Consumers confronting huge arrays of choices whenever they contemplate choosing one brand of toothpaste out of 50, or whether to purchase pulp-free, not-from-concentrate orange juice, calcium-fortified, or the extra-pulp, non-calcified, from-concentrate version, frequ

  • Q : Change in supply of good and in price

    When a change in the supply of a good causes a percentage change within price which exceeds in absolute value the resulting percentage change within quantity demanded, then demand is relatively: (1) price elastic. (2) inferior. (3) no