--%>

Comparative-Advantage Approach to Government Debt Maturity

We study optimal government debt maturity in a model where investors derive monetary servicesfrom holding riskless short-term securities. In a simple setting where the government is the onlyissuer of such riskless paper, it trades off the monetary premium associated with short-term debtagainst the refinancing risk implied by the need to roll over its debt more often. We then extend themodel to allow private financial intermediaries to compete with the government in the provision ofmoney-like claims. We argue that if there are negative externalities associated with private moneycreation, the government should tilt its issuance more towards short maturities. The idea is that thegovernment may have a comparative advantage relative to the private sector in bearing refinancingrisk, and hence should aim to partially crowd out the private sector's use of short-term debt. 

In this paper, we study the question of how the government should optimally determine thematurity structure of its debt. We focus on situations where there is no question about thegovernment's ability to service its obligations, so the analysis should be thought of as applying tocountries like the U.S. that are seen to be of high credit quality.1 The primary novelty of our approachis that we emphasize the monetary benefits that investors derive from holding riskless securities, suchas short-term Treasury bills. These benefits lead T-bills to embed a convenience premium, i.e., tohave a lower yield than would be expected from a traditional asset-pricing model. 

We begin with the case where the government is the only entity able to create riskless moneylikesecurities. In this case, optimal debt maturity turns on a simple tradeoff. On the one hand, as thegovernment tilts its issuance to shorter maturities, it generates more in the way of monetary servicesthat are socially valuable; this is reflected in a lower expected financing cost. On the other hand, astrategy of short-term financing also exposes the government to rollover risk, given that futureinterest rates are unpredictable. As a number of previous papers have observed, such rollover riskleads to real costs insofar as it makes future taxes more volatile. 

This tradeoff yields a well-defined interior optimum for government debt maturity, unliketraditional tax-smoothing models which imply that government debt should be very long term. It alsoimplies a number of comparative statics that are borne out in the data. Most notably, it predicts thatgovernment debt maturity will be positively correlated with the ratio of government debt to GDP, apattern which emerges strongly in U.S. data. The intuition is that as the aggregate debt burden grows,the costs associated with rollover risk-and hence with failing to smooth taxes-loom larger. 

The simple tradeoff model also captures the way in which Treasury and Federal Reservepractitioners have traditionally framed the debt-maturity problem. According to former TreasurySecretary Lawrence Summers: 

   Related Questions in Managerial Accounting

  • Q : Calculate From the books of Aggarwal

    From the books of Aggarwal Bors, the following information have been extracted: Rs. Sales 2,40,000 Variable costs 1,44,000 Fixed costs 26,000 Profit before tax 70,000 Rate of tax 40% The firm is proposing to buy a new plant which can generate additional annual profit of Rs. 10,000. The fixed

  • Q : Budget surplus Select the right answer

    Select the right answer of the question. If the economy has a standardized budget surplus, it means that: A) the public sector is exerting an expansionary impact on the economy. B) tax revenues would exceed government expenditures if full employment were achieved. C)

  • Q : Asset retirement obligation Significant

    Significant costs associated with the disposal of asset. Accounting for asset retirement obligations requires estimating the cost and discounting estimate. The present value added to the asset's depreciable base and a liability is recorded for the obligation. Every year, interest expense is added

  • Q : Define Avoidable Cost Avoidable Cost :

    Avoidable Cost: The cost related with an activity which would not be acquired if the activity were not executed.

  • Q : Define Inter-Entity Inter-Entity : A

    Inter-Entity: A term meaning between or among distinct federal reporting entities. It generally refers to the activities or costs among two or more agencies, bureaus or departments.

  • Q : Cash shortage/overage An income

    An income statement item that represents the difference between the actual cash amount and an accounting measure of how much cash there should be. The most common example exists in a retail situation where the cash in the cash register is compared to the register tape

  • Q : Gantt bonus plan under gantt's bonus

    under gantt's bonus plan, no bonus is payable to the worker if is effeciency is less than how much?

  • Q : Liability of partners Liability of

    Liability of partners: A) Under contract law: Liability is joint only (collectively); The creditor has only one right of action (except in NSW, where liability is now joint and several).

  • Q : What is Variable Cost Variable Cost : A

    Variable Cost: A cost which differs with changes in the level of an activity, whenever the other factors are held constant. The cost of material treating to an activity, for illustration, differs according to the number of material de

  • Q : What is Incremental Cost Incremental

    Incremental Cost: The raise or reduction in total costs which would result from a decision to raise or reduce output level, to add a service or task, or to modify any part of operations. This information aids in making decisions such