--%>

Changes in relative prices make Allocative Efficiency

Changes in relative prices make easy allocative efficiency through operating like a rationing mechanism while: (i) Ken and Barbie postpone their wedding since they both lost their jobs throughout a recession. (ii) Political instability within the Middle East raises gasoline prices, causing new car buyers to buy fuel-efficient hybrids in place of gas-guzzlers. (iii) Poor people can’t afford plastic surgery. (iv) The price of a corporate stock falls after auditors discover which corporate executives have been falsifying accounting records of the firm. (v) Technological advances decrees prices for computer chips and stimulate enlargement of new consumer electronic products.

Can anybody recommend me the proper explanation for specified problem regarding Allocative Efficiency.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Example of Relative Price Suppose a

    Suppose a deluxe hamburger is $5, an Oreo blizzard is $3, and a soda is $1. Then the relative price of the hamburger is: (a) 1.6 blizzards. (b) four sodas and half of a blizzard. (c) two blizzards. (d) a blizzard and one soda.

    Q : Description about the wealth of nations

    In 1776 Adam Smith’s work, The Wealth of Nations, is mainly a description of how: (1) democratic socialism is more efficient than totalitarianism. (2) self interest is coordinated within a market system. (3) barriers to internat

  • Q : Comparative Systems- Central planning

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the following options. The command economy is mainly based on: (i) Laissez faire govt. policies and private property rights. (ii) ‘kolkhoz’ decision making. (iii) Well tuning production to match the

  • Q : Example of Normative Economics with no

    A statement which needs no value judgments would be which an optimal distribution of goods is: (w) invariably best for society. (x) better for society than any non-optimal distribution of goods. (y) better for society only when this conforms to the will of the majorit

  • Q : Improvements in Economic growth I have

    I have a problem in economics on Improvements in Economic growth. Please help me in the following question. Economic growth would be encouraged by enhancements in: (1) Economic efficiency. (2) Technology. (3) People’s attitudes. (4) Unemployment

  • Q : Problem on Laissez-faire The movement

    The movement towards laissez-faire policies would best be described by a strategy to: (1) Stimulate the domestic production by raising import tariffs. (2) Remove laws to subsidize farming. (3) Guarantee food stamps for fundamental survival. (4) Functi

  • Q : Majority worse off and minority better

    When an economic change makes a huge majority of the population worse off and a minute minority better off, the alteration is: (w) good for society because it made some people better off. (x) bad for society since only a few people ar

  • Q : Technological advances in Production

    Movements all along the production possibilities curve would not replicate: (1) Technological advances. (2) A society’s choice-making among alternative output combinations. (3) The limiting factor of scarcity in output choices. (4) Opportunity c

  • Q : Economist-Conclusion for redistribution

    I want a good answer on the topic of normative economics. Please give me your opinion that if wealth and income both were redistributed by the richest one to the poorest five percent of the population, conclusion of an economist would be that: (w) soc

  • Q : When a free good enjoyed by people is

    A free good is something which people enjoy but that is not scarce since: (w) people can costlessly have all they want. (x) people can purchase this along  with credit without containing to immediately pay for htis. (y) luxuries