--%>

Changes in relative prices make Allocative Efficiency

Changes in relative prices make easy allocative efficiency through operating like a rationing mechanism while: (i) Ken and Barbie postpone their wedding since they both lost their jobs throughout a recession. (ii) Political instability within the Middle East raises gasoline prices, causing new car buyers to buy fuel-efficient hybrids in place of gas-guzzlers. (iii) Poor people can’t afford plastic surgery. (iv) The price of a corporate stock falls after auditors discover which corporate executives have been falsifying accounting records of the firm. (v) Technological advances decrees prices for computer chips and stimulate enlargement of new consumer electronic products.

Can anybody recommend me the proper explanation for specified problem regarding Allocative Efficiency.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Punishment to criminals devoid of

    The early philosopher who argued about criminals must be punished proportionally to the harm completed to society, but without consideration of remorse, intent or motive was: (1) John Stuart Mill. (2) Edwin Chadwick. (3) Jeremy Bentham. (4) Adam Smith. (5) Aristotle.<

  • Q : Rationally optimal decisions hinge on

    Economic scarcity is pervasive, that makes choices essential. Therefore, rationally optimal decisions hinge on tradeoffs which essentially reflect as: (1) using cooperative allocative mechanisms to minimize inequity. (2) opportunity costs. (3) competi

  • Q : Determine an example of net investment

    When gross investment is $100 billion whereas $10 billion of capital is worn out, in that case net investment is: (w) $90 billion. (x) $100 billion. (y) $110 billion. (z) not possible to calculate without more information.

    Q : Requirement of government transaction

    A federal regulation needing all government transaction to be based upon ideal information would be: (v) The surest way to create best decisions. (w) Consistent along with the ideals of Occam's razor. (x) Impossible since no computer could handle which much informatio

  • Q : Explain about the term whom in

    The fundamental economic questions are "What?”, “How?”, and “For whom”? When we ask, "For whom?", we need to know who will: (w) produce the goods. (x) consume the goods. (y) get the profits. (z) decide wh

  • Q : Punishment must fir to crime by Jeremy

    In words of Jeremy Bentham, punishment for a particular committing a wrong against society must be: (i) decided by a jury of the person’s peers. (ii) depends on the individual’s intentions. (iii) depends on the criminal’s position in

  • Q : Classified resources within the broad

    Can anybody recommend me the proper explanation for specified problem regarding how classified resources within the broad categories: (i) Economic goods, free goods, and bads. (ii) Productive and nonproductive goods. (iii) Land, labor, capital, and en

  • Q : Requirement of economic efficiency

    Economic efficiency needs which the: (i) Productivity is minimized subject to a specified cost. (ii) Production cost of a specified value of output is minimized. (iii) Cost is maximized subject to an output constraint. (iv) Whole dollar value of outpu

  • Q : Define positive technical statement on

    A positive technical statement on the subject of college life is which: (1) college deans are more moral than department chairs. (2) elite colleges frequently admit the wrong students. (3) history professors and accounting professors deserve similar pay. (4) on averag

  • Q : Primarily dealing of positive economic

    Please help me to solve the problem of Positive Economics which is specified above. Positive economic statements deal primarily along with: (w) the way things should be. (x) Technically testable ec