--%>

Chance for arbitrage

Assume the price of unleaded regular octane gasoline were 20 cents per gallon higher in New Jersey than in Oklahoma.  Do you think there would be chance for arbitrage (that means. that firms could buy gas in Oklahoma and then sell it at profit in New Jersey)?  Why or why not?

Oklahoma and New Jersey stand for separate geographic markets for gasoline due to high transportation costs.  If transportation costs were zero, a price raise in New Jersey would prompt arbitrageurs to buy gasoline in Oklahoma and sell it in New Jersey.  In this case it is unlikely that the 20 cents per gallon difference in costs would be high sufficient to create a profitable opportunity for arbitrage, given both transactions costs & transportation costs.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Output of profit-maximizing monopolist

    Hybrid Roses is the merely florist in 60 miles of Presidio, Texas. When total fixed costs (for example, rent and utilities) are $9 per hour, such profit-maximizing monopolist will generate an output of: (1) two dozen roses per hour. (

  • Q : Product differentiation in gain

    Monopolistic competitors: (1) base decisions on the anticipated reactions of their many individual competitors. (2) can easily enter but not exit industries. (3) may sometimes act like monopolists and gain economic profits in the short run because of

  • Q : Structure-conduct-performance From

    From roughly 1890 till 1970 year, the “structure-conduct-performance paradigm” controlled theories regarding how firms behave in various types of markets. The term “structure” in this expression refers to such

  • Q : Laws and regulations for competitive

    Government regulation intends at certain potentially competitive prices or transactions frequently induce private adjustments through firms and individual therefore unexpected results comprise: (w) increased rates of growth of tax revenues. (x) rapid

  • Q : How is Economic policy more scientific

    Which of the given LEAST describes the widespread but erroneous view which economists seldom agree: (1) The media focuses upon controversy, not agreement. (2) Political considerations, more than economic logic, find out policies. (3) Some economists may feel obligated

  • Q : High economic profits High economic

    High economic profits for firms are least probable to arise by: (1) important market power. (2) “cut-throat” competitive pricing policies. (3) superior products. (4) unusually efficient managers. (5) price-maker behavior.

    Q : Powerful negative externalities in

    Potentially powerful negative externalities are mainly overwhelmingly a decisive argument against permitting laissez faire policies and supplies to govern the production and market demands and distribution of: (1) avian flu antivirus shots. (2) public

  • Q : Buyers and sellers as in price-takers

    Price-takers comprise buyers or sellers who are not capable to: (w) resist monopolistic exploitation. (x) influence the prevailing market price. (y) adjust the amounts they buy or sell. (z) make short-run economic profits.

    Q : Illustrations of individuals engaged in

    Illustrations of individuals engaged in the productive activities would not comprise a: (1) Speculator who purchases wheat at harvest time and vends it at a higher price afterward. (2) Trucker who hauls the grain from North Dakota to the flour mill in

  • Q : Market demand with market power

    LoCalLoCarbo has turn into the favorite of fad dieters. There in illustrated graph curve B shows: (i) LoCalLoCarbo’s marginal cost curve. (ii) LoCalLoCarbo’s average variable cost curve. (iii) LoCalLoCarbo’s average total cost curve. (iv) the market