--%>

Chance for arbitrage

Assume the price of unleaded regular octane gasoline were 20 cents per gallon higher in New Jersey than in Oklahoma.  Do you think there would be chance for arbitrage (that means. that firms could buy gas in Oklahoma and then sell it at profit in New Jersey)?  Why or why not?

Oklahoma and New Jersey stand for separate geographic markets for gasoline due to high transportation costs.  If transportation costs were zero, a price raise in New Jersey would prompt arbitrageurs to buy gasoline in Oklahoma and sell it in New Jersey.  In this case it is unlikely that the 20 cents per gallon difference in costs would be high sufficient to create a profitable opportunity for arbitrage, given both transactions costs & transportation costs.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Opportunity Costs to Society of Funding

    The clearest signals of the opportunity costs to society of funding one investment in place of another are relative: (w) interest rates, expected rates of return, and also expected economic profit. (x) production costs for various goo

  • Q : Industrial Unions-specific industry Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The industrial union is intended to cover all the workers who: (1) Encompass a specific skill. (2) Are in a specific industry. (3) Encompass experience as apprentices. (4) Work merely on assem

  • Q : Advantage of a partnership over

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. One of the advantages of a partnership over proprietorship is: (i) In a partnership just one partner is liable for the debt. (ii) Partnerships permit for more specialization in the management.

  • Q : Workers volunteered to work in purely

    Even though workers volunteered to work as "for free", such purely competitive firm would never hire more than: (i) L2 workers. (ii) L3 workers. (iii) L4 workers. (iv) L5 workers. (v) L6 workers.<

  • Q : Problem on diminishing returns I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Problem on diminishing returns. Please help me in the following question. The principle of diminishing marginal utility is a contrast of the law of: (1) Comparative consumer benefit. (2) Diminishing returns. (3) Effective explanation.

  • Q : Problem on Categories of Goods I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Problem on Categories of Goods. Please help me in the following question. The produced tangible good is termed as a: (i) Consumable. (ii) Service. (iii) Commodity. (iv) Utility. Sel

  • Q : Increases profits by marginal revenue

    Assuming which marginal revenue equals $4 and marginal cost equals $5, a monopolist could raise profits by: (w) lowering both price and output. (x) increasing both price and output. (y) increasing price and decreasing output. (z) decr

  • Q : Firm under monopoly A firm under

    A firm under monopoly a price maker by the reasons shown below:A) The monopolist is a single seller of the product in market. Therefore it has full control over supply.B) There are no close replacements of the monopoly product,

  • Q : Wage Differentials-similar wages Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. As compared to men with identical amounts of experience or education, women on an average earn: (1) Higher wages. (2) Similar wages. (3) Lower wages. (4) There is no special pat

  • Q : Example of an explicit cost Which of

    Which of the given below is an example of the explicit cost? (i) The owner’s time. (ii) Depreciation on company owned truck. (iii) The interest which could be earned when some of the owner’s funds was not tied up in business. (iv) Salaries paid to the empl