--%>

Chance for arbitrage

Assume the price of unleaded regular octane gasoline were 20 cents per gallon higher in New Jersey than in Oklahoma.  Do you think there would be chance for arbitrage (that means. that firms could buy gas in Oklahoma and then sell it at profit in New Jersey)?  Why or why not?

Oklahoma and New Jersey stand for separate geographic markets for gasoline due to high transportation costs.  If transportation costs were zero, a price raise in New Jersey would prompt arbitrageurs to buy gasoline in Oklahoma and sell it in New Jersey.  In this case it is unlikely that the 20 cents per gallon difference in costs would be high sufficient to create a profitable opportunity for arbitrage, given both transactions costs & transportation costs.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Simultaneously and automatically

    When fear that giant firms will default onto their debts drives down the prices of corporate bonds, in that case: (w) established corporations will rely more heavily onto sales of stock to secure funds. (x) interest rates onto these bonds increase sim

  • Q : Accounting profit when implicit cost

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. When implicit cost surpasses implicit revenue and economic profit is zero (0), then accounting profit is: (1) Bigger than zero. (2) Zero. (3) Less than 0 (zero). (4) Not specifi

  • Q : Labor Productivity The American workers

    The American workers tend to be much productive than their counterparts in the South America or Asia in part as they have: (i) Superior natural genetic endowments. (ii) Access to the better sports programming, that promotes the team-work. (iii) More capital to work wi

  • Q : Victimization of Adverse Selection When

    When an heiress’s fiance plans to murder her soon subsequent to the wedding in order to inherit her estate, she has actually been victimized by: (1) Moral hazard. (2) Adverse selection. (3) Cognitive dissonance. (4) Irrational ignorance.

    Q : Marginal revenue for the pure monopolist

    Give the answer of following question. Price exceeds marginal revenue for the pure monopolist because the: A) law of diminishing returns is inapplicable. B) demand curve is downsloping. C) monopolist produces a smaller output than would a purely competitive firm. D) d

  • Q : Monopolist of profit maximizing When

    When this is feasible for total revenue to cover all variable costs, in that case a profit maximizing monopolist will generate: (w) where marginal revenue equals marginal costs [MR = MC]. (x) in the inelastic portion of the demand cur

  • Q : Minimize losses at wholesale price in

    The wholesale price per bushel of peaches below that it purely competitive peach orchard would minimize losses via shutting down its operations is: (1) $4.00 per bushel of peaches. (2) $7.67 per bushel of peaches. (3) $8.00 per bushel

  • Q : Diseconomies of Scale Diseconomies of

    Diseconomies of Scale: The diseconomies are the drawbacks occurring to a firm or a group of firms due to big scale production.Internal Diseco

  • Q : Determine total revenue by quantity and

    In this demonstrated figure, the total revenue: (w) varies inversely along with price in range b. (x) is minimized at the midpoint of the demand curve. (y) remains unchanged like price changes within range b. (z) will raise as price falls within range

  • Q : Estimation of price elasticity of

    You can calculate approximately a price elasticity of supply by data indicating that: (a) steel production rises 18 % while national income grows 13 %. (b) farmers increase soybean plantings 15 % while prices rise 5 %. (c) Ford raises production when