--%>

Case study of Espresso Tax

Seattle is currently considering a 10-cent tax on espresso drinks to pay for pre-school and day-care programs. The legislation’s sponsor, Rep. Burbank, argues that people who spend $3-5 on exotic espresso based coffee drinks can afford – and will be “happy to pay” - an extra dime for kids.  But coffee shop owners have been fighting the tax.  Jeff Babcock, owner of Zoka Coffee, staged a rally in protest this month. He says “It’s not a luxury item as far as the culture here.  It’s a cold, wet, damp environment. Coffee’s big, and everyone loves their lattes.”  Zoka says most of his customers are liberal, and tend to support government spending, but that they oppose the Espresso tax. “They just think it’s a crazy tax,” he says.

The Seattle ballot measure (Prop 77) would not tax regular drip coffee, only espresso drinks. Proponents of the tax say it will raise “at least $6.5 million a year,” while a more conservative City Council estimate says annual revenue will likely top out at $3.5 million.

Use these facts in considering the following questions:
- The population of Seattle is 572,000
- Only half the people in Seattle drink any espresso drinks.  Among those who do, the average person drinks 230 espresso drinks per year.
- The average espresso drink costs $4.00
- Competition among coffee shops is so intense that the price of $4/drink covers only the cost of rent, labor, materials, and normal return on capital. As a result, no coffee shop is willing to sell espresso drinks unless they realize at least $4 in revenue / drink.  As a result, the tax will have the net effect of increasing the price of espresso drinks to $4.10.

Questions:

1. If the City Council’s revenue projection is accurate, what, to the nearest hundredth, is the value of the own price elasticity of demand for espresso drinks?  Show your work.

2. Assuming the Council’s $3.5 million revenue estimate is accurate; estimate the deadweight loss that would result from the imposition of the tax.  Show your work.

3. What is the ratio of the deadweight loss to the amount of revenue raised by the tax?

   Related Questions in Financial Accounting

  • Q : Asset-allocation funds Mutual funds

    Mutual funds that hold both bonds and stocks. Some asset-allocation funds follow specified allocation percentages and others take advantage of current condition. Those that take advantage of current condition is higher risk, because the fund manager tries to adjust the allocations to take advanta

  • Q : What is the equivalent rate A bank

    A bank quotes an interest rate of 13.5% per annum with quarterly compounding. What is the equivalent rate with (a) continuous compounding and (b) annual compounding?

  • Q : Contingent Liabilities Explain the term

    Explain the term Contingent Liabilities?

  • Q : Creatives and Suites What happens when

    What happens when creativity based on individual exceptionalism has evolved as part of the orthodoxy of Western managerial practice is applied within a creative business organisation in the business of “symbolic production&rdquo

  • Q : Segmented capital market Assume that

    Assume that your firm is operating in the segmented capital market. State some of the actions that you would recommend to diminish the negative effects?

  • Q : Investment approach of Warren Buffet

    Investment approach of Warren Buffet: According to Benjamin Graham, the father of securities analysis, value investment was the only form of investment which means that purchasing a stock at less than its intrinsic

  • Q : Sharpe performance measure concept

    Explain the Sharpe performance measure concept.

  • Q : Acc company A began operation on

    company A began operation on january 1,2012. The annual reporting period ends December 31.The trial balance on January 1,2013 was as follows

  • Q : Double taxation Specify some of the

    Specify some of the methods taxing authorities utilize to remove or diminish evil of double taxation?

  • Q : Performing the capital budgeting

    Explain difference between performing the capital budgeting analysis from the parent firm’s perspective as opposed to the project perspective.