--%>

Case study of Espresso Tax

Seattle is currently considering a 10-cent tax on espresso drinks to pay for pre-school and day-care programs. The legislation’s sponsor, Rep. Burbank, argues that people who spend $3-5 on exotic espresso based coffee drinks can afford – and will be “happy to pay” - an extra dime for kids.  But coffee shop owners have been fighting the tax.  Jeff Babcock, owner of Zoka Coffee, staged a rally in protest this month. He says “It’s not a luxury item as far as the culture here.  It’s a cold, wet, damp environment. Coffee’s big, and everyone loves their lattes.”  Zoka says most of his customers are liberal, and tend to support government spending, but that they oppose the Espresso tax. “They just think it’s a crazy tax,” he says.

The Seattle ballot measure (Prop 77) would not tax regular drip coffee, only espresso drinks. Proponents of the tax say it will raise “at least $6.5 million a year,” while a more conservative City Council estimate says annual revenue will likely top out at $3.5 million.

Use these facts in considering the following questions:
- The population of Seattle is 572,000
- Only half the people in Seattle drink any espresso drinks.  Among those who do, the average person drinks 230 espresso drinks per year.
- The average espresso drink costs $4.00
- Competition among coffee shops is so intense that the price of $4/drink covers only the cost of rent, labor, materials, and normal return on capital. As a result, no coffee shop is willing to sell espresso drinks unless they realize at least $4 in revenue / drink.  As a result, the tax will have the net effect of increasing the price of espresso drinks to $4.10.

Questions:

1. If the City Council’s revenue projection is accurate, what, to the nearest hundredth, is the value of the own price elasticity of demand for espresso drinks?  Show your work.

2. Assuming the Council’s $3.5 million revenue estimate is accurate; estimate the deadweight loss that would result from the imposition of the tax.  Show your work.

3. What is the ratio of the deadweight loss to the amount of revenue raised by the tax?

   Related Questions in Financial Accounting

  • Q : Major reasons of current account

    In contrast to the U.S., Japan has observed constant current account surpluses. What would be the major reasons for such surpluses? Is it advantageous to have constant current account surpluses?

  • Q : Rule of nominal account Why the rule of

    Why the rule of nominal account is just opposite with the rule of personal account and real account?

  • Q : Merits of Budgetary Control Write down

    Write down the merits of Budgetary Control?

  • Q : Function of budgetary control play in

    Describe the function of budgetary control play in cost control? And also write down the requirements for its triumphant execution?

  • Q : Comprehensive Problem in Accounting

    Accounting Comprehensive Problem The case involves one accounting cycle (regular journal entries, adjusting journal entries, preparing financial statements,

  • Q : Concessionary loan with APV model State

    State nature of the concessionary loan and explain how it is handled within the APV model?

  • Q : Why teaching of accounting is not simple

    Why teaching of accounting is not simple. Illustrate this statement.

  • Q : Applications of Matlab in Embedded

    Do you face difficulty with embedded system problems using matlab? Do you require help in embedded system assignment and project? We have team of tutors who are highly qualified and practiced in embedded system using matlab. They have vast industrial knowledge of matlab. W

  • Q : Asian firms building the production

    Since NAFTA was developed, several Asian firms particularly those from the Korea and Japan has made the extensive investments in the Mexico. Why do you think these Asian firms decided to build the production facilities in the Mexico?

  • Q : Essential condition for

    Specify the essential condition for the fixed-for-floating interest rate swap to be possible?