--%>

Calculating fat-tax

Question:

Max has a utility function U =√ x1x2 where x1 is litres of ice-cream and x2 is boxes of strawberries. The marginal utility of a litre if ice-cream is MU1 =0.5 √x2/ x1 and the marginal utility of a box of strawberries is MU2 =0.5 √x1 /x2. The prices of x1 and x2 are both $2 and Max has a budget of $80.

(a) How much of each good will Max demand?

(b) A fat-tax of $2 per litre is placed on ice-cream so that it now costs Max $4 per litre. Everything else remains the same. How much of each good does Max now consume? How much tax does he pay?

(c) Now suppose that, instead of imposing a $2 tax on ice-cream, the government imposes a $20 income tax, reducing Max's budget to $60. Would Max prefer the $2 tax on ice-cream or the $20 reduction is his budget?

Solution:

U = (x1x2)0.5, P1 = 2, P2 = 2, m = 80

Therefore, the budget equation is:

2x1 + 2x2 = 80

MU1 = 0.5(x2/x1)0.5, MU2 = 0.5(x1/x2)0.5

Therefore, MRS = MU1/MU2 = x2/x1

Setting MRS = P1/P2 = 1, we get,

x2/x1 = 1 => x2 = x1

a) Using the budget equation:

2x1 + 2x2 = 80

  1.   x1 + x2 = 40
  2.   2x1 = 40
  3.   x1 = 20 = x2

Therefore, he will demand 20 units each of both the goods.

b) Now, P1 = 4

MRS = P1/P2

  1.   x2/x1 = 4/2
  2.   x2/x1= 2
  3.   x2 =2x1

Putting it into the budget equation:

x1 + x2 = 40

  1.   x1 + 2x1 = 40
  2.   x1 = 40/3
  3.   x2 = 80/3

Therefore, tax paid = 40/3 x 2 = 80/3

c) The new budget equation:

x1 + x2 = 60/2 = 30

Putting, x1 = x2 in the budget equation, we get,

  1. 2x1 = 30
  2.   x1 = 15
  3.   x2 = 15

Utility with fat-tax = (40 x 80/9)0.5 = [40Ö2]/3= 18.86

Utility with income tax = 15

Therefore, Max will prefer the fat-tax on ice cream.

   Related Questions in Business Economics

  • Q : Comparative advantage in production I

    I have a problem in economics on Comparative advantage in production. Please help me in the following question. The oranges are grown in Florida and potatoes are grown in Maine mainly since: (i) orange-grower’s in Maine have not lobbied effectiv

  • Q : Categorization of economists for buying

    Assume that you bought a ton of gold in Santiago, and Chile for $450 per ounce and immediately sold all of this in Antwerp, Belgium for $480 per ounce. Therefore economists would categorize your movement as: (i) arbitrage. (ii) scalping. (iii) screening. (iv) speculat

  • Q : Public policies for low-income Fuel

    Fuel stamp programs which subsidize heating oil purchases through low-income households encourage those families to: (w) create more income by working. (x) particularly conserve on their use of fuel. (y) live along with less purchasing power. (z) subs

  • Q : Illustrate the Comparative advantage

    Illustrate the Comparative advantage and terms of trade?

  • Q : What are the dependencies in U.S. and

    What are the dependencies in U.S. and World Trade?

  • Q : Factors of account since the Second

    For rapid growth of world trade what are the factors of account since the Second World War?

  • Q : Loathed monopolization and viewed of

    Adam Smith and most of the typical economists who followed instantly in his footsteps: (i) viewed monopoly as no big problem. (ii) encouraged monopolies due to their research and development abilities. (iii) thought monopoly power was a communist plot

  • Q : Problem regarding to intermediaries and

    Society gains from the activities of intermediaries which succeed within: (1) falling uncertainty and transaction costs for last consumers. (2) arbitrating strikes and defending workers’ rights. (3) creating productive jobs for unskilled workers

  • Q : Perfect Competition leads to Allocative

    A perfectly competitive industry achieves allocative efficiency since: w) goods and services are produced at the lowest possible cost. x) services and goods are produced up to the point where the last unit gives a marginal benefit to consumers equivalent to the margin

  • Q : Introduction of the term Control Factor

    Give a brief introduction of the term Control Factor?