--%>

Calculating fat-tax

Question:

Max has a utility function U =√ x1x2 where x1 is litres of ice-cream and x2 is boxes of strawberries. The marginal utility of a litre if ice-cream is MU1 =0.5 √x2/ x1 and the marginal utility of a box of strawberries is MU2 =0.5 √x1 /x2. The prices of x1 and x2 are both $2 and Max has a budget of $80.

(a) How much of each good will Max demand?

(b) A fat-tax of $2 per litre is placed on ice-cream so that it now costs Max $4 per litre. Everything else remains the same. How much of each good does Max now consume? How much tax does he pay?

(c) Now suppose that, instead of imposing a $2 tax on ice-cream, the government imposes a $20 income tax, reducing Max's budget to $60. Would Max prefer the $2 tax on ice-cream or the $20 reduction is his budget?

Solution:

U = (x1x2)0.5, P1 = 2, P2 = 2, m = 80

Therefore, the budget equation is:

2x1 + 2x2 = 80

MU1 = 0.5(x2/x1)0.5, MU2 = 0.5(x1/x2)0.5

Therefore, MRS = MU1/MU2 = x2/x1

Setting MRS = P1/P2 = 1, we get,

x2/x1 = 1 => x2 = x1

a) Using the budget equation:

2x1 + 2x2 = 80

  1.   x1 + x2 = 40
  2.   2x1 = 40
  3.   x1 = 20 = x2

Therefore, he will demand 20 units each of both the goods.

b) Now, P1 = 4

MRS = P1/P2

  1.   x2/x1 = 4/2
  2.   x2/x1= 2
  3.   x2 =2x1

Putting it into the budget equation:

x1 + x2 = 40

  1.   x1 + 2x1 = 40
  2.   x1 = 40/3
  3.   x2 = 80/3

Therefore, tax paid = 40/3 x 2 = 80/3

c) The new budget equation:

x1 + x2 = 60/2 = 30

Putting, x1 = x2 in the budget equation, we get,

  1. 2x1 = 30
  2.   x1 = 15
  3.   x2 = 15

Utility with fat-tax = (40 x 80/9)0.5 = [40Ö2]/3= 18.86

Utility with income tax = 15

Therefore, Max will prefer the fat-tax on ice cream.

   Related Questions in Business Economics

  • Q : Marginal rate of substitution Problem:

    Problem: Luke likes to consumer CDs (good1) and pizzas (good 2). His preference over both goods is given by the utility function U(x1; x2) = x21

  • Q : Larger amount is actually purchased at

    Critically evaluate:  “In comparing the two equilibrium positions, it note that a larger amount is actually purchased at a higher price. This disprove the law of demand.”

  • Q : Illustrate Freedom of enterprise and

    Illustrate Freedom of enterprise and choice exist?

  • Q : Case of arbitrage while selling and

    Assume that melons sell for $5 in Brazil when moose pelts sell for $10, still into Canada melons sell for $10 as well as moose pelts sell for $5. A person who buys moose pelts within Canada to sell into Brazil would be doing: (1) speculation. (2) the “invisible

  • Q : What is the opportunity cost of

    What is the opportunity cost of attending college?  In 2000, nearly 80% of college-educated Americans held jobs, whereas only about 40% of those who did not finish high school held jobs.  How might this difference relate to opportunity costs?

  • Q : Productive capacity After the Spanish

    After the Spanish found the new world, they promptly began to plunder this. They imported huge amount of gold and silver to Spain. It inflow of bullion caused a rapid increase in inflation, that would have grave consequences for Spain. It is quick inflation made this

  • Q : Economic efficiency enhancement as

    Transaction costs are decreased and economic efficiency is enhanced by: (1) long-term wage and price controls. (2) monopolies which cooperate with central planners. (3) blacklists and yellow dog contracts. (4) bureaucratic tendencies

  • Q : Explain of the law of demand Explain of

    Explain of the law of demand?

  • Q : Introduction of the term Cost of

    Give a brief introduction of the term Cost of retained earnings?

  • Q : Why does the supply curve slope upward

    Explain the law of supply. Why does the supply curve slope upward?