Calculate present value of expected cash flow to shareholder
When valuing the shares of my company, I calculate the present value of the expected cash flows to shareholders moreover I add to the result obtained cash holdings and liquid investment. Is that correct?
Expert
The company is incorrect to add those, if it is not going to distribute the cash holdings in the near future. This is also incorrect to add the complete value of the cash holdings since the company requirements part of it to go on with its operations as the minimum cash holdings.
This could be correct to add all the cash holdings only in the following cases as follows:
a) When the interest rate received for the treasury to equal the interest rate paid for debt;
b) When the cash holdings were distributed instantly, and
c) When the cost of debt needed to compute the WACC was the weighted average of the cost of debt and the interest rate received for the treasury in this a case, the helpful debt in order to compute the ratio debt/shareholder’s equity has to be the debt minus the cash holdings.
The value of the excess cash holdings but over the essential amount in order to go on with the operations is lower than the book value when the interests received for the treasury are lower than interests paid for debt.
What is the market risk premium within Spain at the present time – the number that I have to use in the valuations?
Is the depreciation is the loss of value of fixed assets?
Who explained the high-peak/fat-tails?
Exploitation of favorable market conditions: The firms after estimating WCR are in a position to clearly identify their status of excess current assets. After this realization they can use this knowledge to encash conditions arising in market even for
Did you notice the Vueling case? How is this possible that an investment bank sets the objective price of its shares in €2.50 per share upon the 2nd of October, 2007, just after replacing Vueling shares at €31 per share in J
financial engineering examples,benifits,disadvantages
Suppose we calculate g as ROE (1–p)/(1–ROE (1–p)) and the Ke by the CAPM. We replace both values into the formula PER = (ROE (1+g) – g)/ROE (Ke-g) but there PER we obtain is fully different from the one we get by dividing the quotation of the s
We were assigned a valuation of a pharmaceutical laboratory’ shares. Which valuation method is further convenient?
Why classical option pricing with constant volatility required?
Which model of frame work does not provide the very good prices for bonds?
18,76,764
1952184 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1449986
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!