--%>

Boycotts concerning problem

People who decline to buy the products of a firm whose activities they disapprove, especially whenever such rejection is intended to support the employees who are on strike, and who advise others to not purchase such products, or to not deal with these firms, are engaged in: (i) Embargo. (ii) Illegal strategy. (iii) Trade war. (iv) Boycott.

Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the above options.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Price floors with government purchases

    Suppose the U.S. wheat market is primarily in a stable equilibrium upon S0D0. Assume now that the government institutes a legal price floor at P3 per bushel of wheat. When the government will buy and store any resulting surplus

  • Q : Market economies of individual

    In the market economies, resources are finally owned by the: (i) Corporations which dominate the economic activity. (ii) Proprietorships and partnerships. (iii) Business firms collectively. (iv) Individual house-holds. (v) Government acting as the social trustee.

  • Q : Similarity of elasticities of demand

    When a price hike for regular gas from $2.00 to $2.20 reduces quantity demanded from 20 million gallons to 19 million gallons daily, and an raise in the price of premium gas from $3.00 to $3.20 decreases its quantity demanded daily from 20 million gal

  • Q : Make economic profits by

    A profit-maximizing monopolist will certainly be capable to generate economic profits when, at certain level of output: (w) average fixed costs [AFC] are very high. (x) average total costs [ATC] lies above the demand curve. (y) averag

  • Q : Barriers to entry A barrier to entry

    A barrier to entry is: (w) an impediment for firms to expand their output capacity. (x) a limit to the number of entrants to a monopolist industry. (y) an obstacle which makes this hard for new firms to enter the industry. (z) the fixed cost to a pote

  • Q : Dynamic Tit-for-Tat Carlos and Ivana

    Carlos and Ivana are friends and roommates. They eat together despite who cooks. But this cooking game is repeated mostly every evening, across time the probable result would be which: (1) neither Carlos nor Ivana cook, nor do they eat. (2) Carlos alone cooks for both

  • Q : Inverse relationship in Law of Demand

    The law of demand signifies to: (i) The direct relationship accessible between quantity and prices demanded. (ii) The inverse relationship accessible between quantity demanded and opportunity cost. (iii) How demand shifts due to modifications in price

  • Q : Describing the problem of Moral Hazard

    When an NBA all-star bets in opposition to his team in games he plays after getting the money designated in his contract, he would be describing the problem of: (1) Default a version. (2) Over achievement. (3) Moral hazard. (4) Stupidity.

    Q : Sticky prices in oligopoly markets

    Sticky prices within oligopoly markets are: (w) predicted by the kinked demand curve model. (x) substantiated by many statistical studies. (y) most common for highly differentiated products. (z) a result of price discrimination.

    Q : Labor History-Yellow Dog Contracts

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The worker who signed a yellow dog contract in the year 1920s agreed: (1) To support the union’s feather-bedding efforts. (2) Not to work with the ‘scab’ non-union strike-bre