--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Better off and worse off condition in normative economics

When an economic change creates one person better off and a thousand persons worse off, this is: (w) good for society. (x) bad for society. (y) neither good nor bad for society. (z) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding better off and worse off condition in normative economics generally?

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Explaining work in Wealth of Nations In

    In words of Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations had given an explanation of work how: (w) dictatorship is more efficient than democracy. (x) economic processes work in a communistic society. (y) real estate investment is a exact path to

    		•
  • Q : Explain about the term whom in

    The fundamental economic questions are "What?”, “How?”, and “For whom”? When we ask, "For whom?", we need to know who will: (w) produce the goods. (x) consume the goods. (y) get the profits. (z) decide wh

    		•
  • Q : Explain the problem of Self Interest in

    As per the view of humans as Homo economics, individuals: (w) can simply achieve states of whole satisfaction. (x) must learn to get by along with what they have. (y) want to maximize personal satisfaction by self-interested behavior. (z) have fewer requirements as th

    		•
  • Q : When scientific economic analysis NOT

    Please help me to solve the problem of Normative Economics that is specified below: Scientific economic analysis could NOT be utilized for test if there: (i) higher tax rates cause tax revenues to decrease. (ii) on

    		•
  • Q : Technological change in extracting

    Can someone help me in determining the right answer from the given options. A good illustration of technological change would be a discovery of a: (i) Pool of oil as big as any in Kuwait merely a bit south of Cleveland. (ii) Tenth planet as big as Neptune circling our

    		•
  • Q : Define problem of restricted resources

    Alex wants a limitless supply of ice cream, flip-flops and candy bars. However, restricted resources and the time needed to produce these staples leaves Alex facing a problem termed as: (i) scarcity. (ii) disappointment. (iii) insufficiency. (v) inadequacy. (v) hunger. Hello guys I want y

    		•
  • Q : Define the term Prices in prices and

    Prices are: (w) used to ration free goods and resources. (x) zero for several scarce goods and resources. (y) the merely efficient way to assign luxury goods. (z) one mechanism for rationing scarce goods and resources.

    Q : Human rights trump property rights I

    I have a problem in economics on Human rights trump property rights. Please help me in the following question. Loosely translated, the laissez-faire signifies: (i) Control and integrate. (ii) Seize the day. (iii) Human rights trump the property rights

    		•
  • Q : Economic problem of increase employment

    I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion that the concept that restricting steel imports will increase employment within the steel industry that is a: (w) normative argument. (x) Positive argument, since the idea can be te

    		•
  • Q : Bad motives make wrong decisions Which

    Which economic philosopher would have been most probably to have asserted which people do not have bad motives while they make wrong decisions; quite, they make bad computations? (w) Thomas Malthus. (x) Sir Edwin Chadwick. (y) Nassau Senior. (z) Jeremy Bentham. <

    		•