--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Better off and worse off condition in normative economics

When an economic change creates one person better off and a thousand persons worse off, this is: (w) good for society. (x) bad for society. (y) neither good nor bad for society. (z) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding better off and worse off condition in normative economics generally?

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Achieving economic welfare For any

    For any given point on the production possibilities (or PPF) curve: (i) More economic welfare is achieved than from any points within the PPF. (ii) Moving to some other output combination should yield enhanced economic welfare. (iii) More of some good can be generated

    		•
  • Q : Earn zero profit in long run by

    Which of the given statements is right?: w) Economic profit takes within account all costs involved within producing a product. x) Accounting profit is not relevant within preparing the firm's financial statement. y) Economic profit all the time exceeds accounting pro

    		•
  • Q : Explain about the term Profits in

    Profits: (w) are interest on human capital. (x) are an unfortunate consequence of capitalism. (y) burden the economy and decrease efficiency. (z) are monetary rewards to entrepreneurs. Can someone explain/help me w

    		•
  • Q : Determination of opportunity cost of

    The opportunity cost of any type of decision is measured through the: (w) market price of career and education opportunities. (x) value of the worst optional choice sacrificed. (y) market price of the resources used in production. (z) value of the best optional choice

    		•
  • Q : Requirements of each and every economic

    In contrast to free goods, each and every economic goods: (1) Raise happiness. (2) Are taxed. (3) Need large amounts of human labor to generate. (4) Entail opportunity costs? Please help me to solve the problem of

    		•
  • Q : Scaring people of a commodity or service

    Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for given problem that when are people of a commodity or service scarce: (1) gain from having this obtainable, (2) Wish more than the amount freely obtainable, (3) Say no to p

    		•
  • Q : Explain TANSTAAFL TANSTAAFL is an

    TANSTAAFL is an acronym suggestive of that: (1) Tax agents never observe the awful influences from levies. (2) Tenants and needy must take all assets by landlords. (3) There ain't no all things like a free lunch. (4) Temperance and non satiety togethe

    		•
  • Q : Criterion for distributing The

    The requirements criterion for distributing income entails: (1) Government costless offering all goods required for survival. (2) High administrative costs as determining someone else’s wants are difficult. (3) Dividing the national income unifo

    		•
  • Q : Governmental allocations of non-human

    The fundamental foundations of a capitalist system do not comprise: (1) Supplies and demands. (2) Private property rights. (3) Governmental allocations of non-human resources. (4) Laissez faire policies. (5) Market-determined prices and outputs.

    		•
  • Q : Describe an illustration of Positive

    Predicting a fall within the national unemployment rate along with a new untested economic model is an illustration of: (1) positive economic analysis. (2) normative economic analysis. (3) a microeconomic prediction. (4) predictability no better than a call to the psy

    		•