--%>

Better off and worse off condition in normative economics

When an economic change creates one person better off and a thousand persons worse off, this is: (w) good for society. (x) bad for society. (y) neither good nor bad for society. (z) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding better off and worse off condition in normative economics generally?

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Consumption and investment The

    The economy's present production possibilities frontier is not restricted by the: (1) Quantity and quality of labor force. (2) Amount of capital stock currently accessible. (3) Quantity and quality of the natural resources (that is, land). (4) Current

  • Q : Modern sociobiologists concept

    Modern sociobiologists concept perpetuation of individual gene pool like the fundamental human drive, and give numerous illustrations of behavior which apparently conflict along with the economist's homo economicus supposition: Parents sacrifice their whole lives for

  • Q : Illustration of a positive scientific

    An illustration of a positive scientific statement would be which college graduates who: (i) create higher incomes than high school drop outs deserve that higher income. (ii) charge victims of hurricanes as well as other natural disasters outrageous prices must be sho

  • Q : People moods towards Positive Economics

    Average men are innately further perceptive than average women within ascertaining people’s moods and predicting behavior, when average women classically have relatively better depth perception and intrinsically more precise geometric intuition. So, the precedin

  • Q : Payments for Resources Incorrect

    Incorrect statements would contain the assertion which payments for: (a) The use of land is termed as land rent. (b) Labor is termed as wages. (c) Services are termed as profits. (d) Capital is termed as interest. Hello guys I need

  • Q : Requirements of Economic Efficiency

    Economic efficiency needs: (w) distributive, productive and allocative efficiency. (x) engineering and dynamic efficiency. (y) historical and sociological efficiency. (z) chemical and physical efficiency. How can I

  • Q : Explain the view of economist land to

    What is an economist describe “land” to encompass: (1) Such enhancements to natural resources as sidewalks and utility lines. (2) the productive muscle of the economy. (3) all equipment and machinery. (4) any type of additions to the econo

  • Q : Economic questions incapability of

    Economic questions incapable of scientific verification like to correctness or falsity, as like why, how and when to prosecute and execute alleged murderers, or to whom income must be again distributed, fall in the category of: (1) positive economics.

  • Q : Define decisionsmaking on opportunity

    Decisions based upon opportunity costs are not concerned in a direct way whiles: (i) you fail to buckle up before driving a car. (ii) a brilliant high school graduate works like a rapid food cook in place of attending college. (iii) lightning starts a main forest fire

  • Q : Concept of income more to the poor than

    The concept about, on average, further income implies more to the poor than to the rich conforms most to the teachings or philosophy of: (1) Thorstein Veblen. (2) Friedrich Nietzsche. (3) Gautama Buddha. (4) Jeremy Bentham. (5) Nostradamus. (6) Adam S