--%>

Better off and worse off condition in normative economics

When an economic change creates one person better off and a thousand persons worse off, this is: (w) good for society. (x) bad for society. (y) neither good nor bad for society. (z) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding better off and worse off condition in normative economics generally?

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Use of relative prices not inclde by

    Please help me to solve the problem of economics that is given below: The functions of prices do not contain the use of relative prices like: (w) rationing devices. (x) mediums of exchange. (y) inf

  • Q : What would be contained in fundamental

    Fundamental economic questions consist of: (w) what, for whom and how. (x) where, how and when. (y) when, how and what. (z) how many, how much and what color,. Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem o

  • Q : Weak assumptions

    Philosopher-mathematician Henri Poincaré asserted, “When a phenomenon admits of a total mechanical explanation this will admit of any infinity of others that will account equally well for all of the peculiarities disclosed through the experiment.” O

  • Q : Assignments I want it tomorrow night or

    I want it tomorrow night or before, please.

  • Q : Problem regarding costs of buying

    Please recommend me your best answer for given problem. While buying a $70 shirt at Banana Republic maintains you from enjoying the pleasure of a $70 meal at a huge restaurant: (i) Opportunity costs are at play. (ii) You are not be

  • Q : Problem of macroeconomics in economics

    Can anybody advise me the proper explanation for given problem regarding macroeconomics in Economics generally. In macroeconomics, where we examine all things like the: (w) problems of What, How, and For Whom. (x)

  • Q : Current situation- better off without

    When it is possible to make somebody better off without making anybody worse off, the current condition is: (w) efficient. (x) inefficient. (y) optimal. (z) simply enhanced. How can I solve my problem of Economic Efficiency

  • Q : Problem regarding the distributive

    Ted and Willy are eating lunch. Ted has a Snowball and Willy a Ding Dong for dessert. Strongly prefer both Ding Dongs. A required trade of Willy's Ding-Dong for Ted's Snowball would be likely to enhance: (w) distributive efficiency as Fred is better off. (x) allocativ

  • Q : Explain TANSTAAFL TANSTAAFL is an

    TANSTAAFL is an acronym suggestive of that: (1) Tax agents never observe the awful influences from levies. (2) Tenants and needy must take all assets by landlords. (3) There ain't no all things like a free lunch. (4) Temperance and non satiety togethe

  • Q : Illustrations of technological

    I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion that illustrations of technological enhancement would not comprise developing new because: (i) Lighter and less costly and stro