--%>

Better off and worse off condition in normative economics

When an economic change creates one person better off and a thousand persons worse off, this is: (w) good for society. (x) bad for society. (y) neither good nor bad for society. (z) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding better off and worse off condition in normative economics generally?

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Illustrate when firm shuts down

    When a firm shuts down within the short run,: w) its loss equals zero. x) its loss equals its fixed cost. y) is creates zero economic profit. z) its total revenue is not huge adequate to cover its fixed cost. How c

  • Q : Hedonistic calculus–regulation of human

    Social welfare is exploited while a “hedonistic calculus” regulates all human action as per the interventionist “liberal”: (i) John Stuart Mill. (ii) Thorstein Veblen. (iii) Milton Friedman. (iv) Karl Marx. (v)

  • Q : Define the root of normative economics

    Value judgments which address what “must be” are at the root of: (1) microeconomics. (2) scarcity economics. (3) normative economics. (4) positive economics. (5) macroeconomics. How can

  • Q : Illustration regarding to market

    When the soybean market begins within equilibrium upon S0D0 and in that case a highly publicized study demonstrates yoghurt to be much more nutritious than the tofu made by soybeans, the market changes to: (w) S0D2. (x) S

  • Q : Determine the initial distribution of

    When goods are traded and several families gain without worsening other families' well-being, so in that case the initial distribution of goods should have been: (w) optimal. (x) distributively inefficient. (y) superior to the new dis

  • Q : Rationally optimal decisions hinge on

    Economic scarcity is pervasive, that makes choices essential. Therefore, rationally optimal decisions hinge on tradeoffs which essentially reflect as: (1) using cooperative allocative mechanisms to minimize inequity. (2) opportunity costs. (3) competi

  • Q : Explain about the positive technical

    Positive technical statements: (w) need value judgments. (x) should be valid by definition. (y) can be proved and tested or disproved by fact and logic. (z) are the excellent guides in specifying economic policies.

  • Q : Illustration of Positive and Normative

    "Minimum wage rules will reduce service of the workers they are designed to help, but they are desirable because it's more important that 90 percent of the covered workers remain employed at the higher wage than that 10 percent of the covered workers become jobless."

  • Q : Specialization and Gains from Trade

    While people develop expertise by dividing up the assignments encountered within major productive activities as like making a movie or manufacturing a plane, one of the most likely consequences is:  (i) Political instability originates by unavoidable frictions in

  • Q : Problem on Welfare Can someone help me

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the following options. The equal shares criterion of distribution recommends that each and every individual must: (i) Receive income according to necessitate. (ii) Contribute equivalent producti