--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Better off and worse off condition in normative economics

When an economic change creates one person better off and a thousand persons worse off, this is: (w) good for society. (x) bad for society. (y) neither good nor bad for society. (z) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding better off and worse off condition in normative economics generally?

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Explain the normative economic analysis

    Normative economic analysis: (w) involves only non-quantitative measures. (x) gives precise predictions of economic effects. (y) emphasizes a social science approach to problems. (z) is based upon value judgments.

  • Q : Economic goals of all economic activity

    Adam Smith believed about the ultimate suitable objective of all economic activity is to maximizing: (w) wealth and power of the national government. (x) satisfaction of individuals by giving people along with the goods they want. (y) employment oppor

    		•
  • Q : Hypothesis included by normative

    Please help me to solve the problem of hypothesis in normative statements in normative economics that is given below: Normative statements would consist of the hypothesis which: (v) Abuse of alcohol lowers GPAs. (w

    		•
  • Q : Define the root of normative economics

    Value judgments which address what “must be” are at the root of: (1) microeconomics. (2) scarcity economics. (3) normative economics. (4) positive economics. (5) macroeconomics. How can

    		•
  • Q : Explain economics as the study of

    Economics is generally explained as the study of how societies and individuals: (1) make options about work and the division of labor, (2) try to maximize their financial wealth and incomes, (3) answer the fundamental economic questions of "Why, Where, and When", (4)

    		•
  • Q : Influencing goods in Economic Growth I

    I have a problem in economics on Economic Growth. Please help me in the following question. Across time, raising the output of military goods devoid of decreasing the output of civilian goods is: (1) Always unfeasible. (2) Impossible in an economy with very high unemp

    		•
  • Q : Modern sociobiologists concept

    Modern sociobiologists concept perpetuation of individual gene pool like the fundamental human drive, and give numerous illustrations of behavior which apparently conflict along with the economist's homo economicus supposition: Parents sacrifice their whole lives for

    		•
  • Q : Where is economic efficiency for

    Economic efficiency for society does not need that such: (w) the greatest possible satisfaction is enjoyed through all consumers specified their individual budgets. (x) maximum possible value of output from obtainable resources. (y) exact goods are us

    		•
  • Q : Fee-simple private property rights I

    I have a problem in economics on Resources and Products Flow Model. Please help me in the following question. “Fee-simple” private property rights permit you to: (1) Shoot trespassers who are on your land with no permission. (2) Refuse to

    		•
  • Q : Consequence of the increased

    People would be least probable to be happier like a consequence of the increased accessibility of: (1) free goods. (2) economic resources. (3) superior technologies. (4) economic goods. (5) economic bads. Hello guys I want your adv

    		•