Better off and worse off condition in normative economics

When an economic change creates one person better off and a thousand persons worse off, this is: (w) good for society. (x) bad for society. (y) neither good nor bad for society. (z) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding better off and worse off condition in normative economics generally?

View Complete Question

Related Questions in Public Economics

Q : Positive declaration in positive

When a mother tells her young child that thunder is caused by the angels bowling up in heaven, scientists would classify her statement as most clearly: (w) a normative statement. (x) a positive statement. (y) microeconomics in place of macroeconomics. (z) scientifical

Q : Explaining work in Wealth of Nations In

In words of Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations had given an explanation of work how: (w) dictatorship is more efficient than democracy. (x) economic processes work in a communistic society. (y) real estate investment is a exact path to

Q : Explain the normative economic analysis

Normative economic analysis: (w) involves only non-quantitative measures. (x) gives precise predictions of economic effects. (y) emphasizes a social science approach to problems. (z) is based upon value judgments.

Q : High rates of saving and investment Can

Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Production possibilities frontiers can be employed to demonstrate why maximizing economic growth needs: (1) The amount of investment goods to equivalent the quantity of consum

Q : Define a common approach to economics A

A common approach to economics involves studying how: (i) charging interest on loans can be ethical. (ii) resources are allocated to satisfy human wants. (iii) individuals and government should balance their budgets. (iv) to determine the best bargain

Q : Find cigarette taxes testing in

Positive economic analysis would take in testing a theory which raising cigarette taxes would: (1) harm smokers much more than it helped non-smokers. (2) enhance social welfare by reducing smoking from teenagers. (3) boost cigarette prices and decreas

Q : Define illustration of a positive

An illustration of a positive scientific statement would be: (w) vegetarians are healthier than people who gorge on candy and fried chicken. (x) people shouldn't be greedy. (y) justice needs ratification of an Equal Rights Amendment. (z) men mustn't b

Q : Determine when a good is scarce A good

A good is scarce when: (1) individuals are willing to pay a positive price for more of this. (2) this is socially but not individually beneficial. (3) individuals are willing to pay to have this not produced. (4) more is obtainable at

Q : Who thought Murderers do more harm than

Murderers do more harm than shoplifters; therefore they must be punished proportionally more harshly as per the school of thought developed through: (i) medieval scholar Thomas Aquinas. (ii) Chinese leader Mao Zedong. (iii) lawyer and social reformer Jeremy Bentham. (

Q : Occurrence of good or service scarce in

A good or service is scarce when people: (w) would benefit from its reduction. (x) wish more than the amounts freely obtainable. (y) cannot enjoy this simultaneously. (z) can freely consume all they want.

Discover Q & A

Leading Solution Library

Avail More Than 1455556 Solved problems, classrooms assignments, textbook's solutions, for quick Downloads

No hassle, Instant Access

Start Discovering

18,76,764

1942263
Asked

3,689

Active Tutors

1455556

Questions
Answered

Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!

Submit Assignment