--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Better off and worse off condition in normative economics

When an economic change creates one person better off and a thousand persons worse off, this is: (w) good for society. (x) bad for society. (y) neither good nor bad for society. (z) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding better off and worse off condition in normative economics generally?

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Limits of Technological Advances

    Technological advances would not comprise: (i) Native Americans demonstrating Pilgrims how crops grow faster when rotten fish are dropped within with seeds they plant. (ii) pouring coffee through a coffee pot you obtained as a birthday gift. (iii) new

    		•
  • Q : Effects of bankrupted causing prices to

    A predictable result when a drought bankrupted several watermelon farmers would be as: (w) a decline into the price of watermelons. (x) increased demand since watermelons will be scarcer. (y) reduced supply, causing prices to increase. (z) decreased demand due to high

    		•
  • Q : Rationally optimal decisions hinge on

    Economic scarcity is pervasive, that makes choices essential. Therefore, rationally optimal decisions hinge on tradeoffs which essentially reflect as: (1) using cooperative allocative mechanisms to minimize inequity. (2) opportunity costs. (3) competi

    		•
  • Q : Illustrate an economics problem of

    Assume that Michael Jordan purchases the New Jersey Nets basketball franchise and, expecting an explosion of sales at his car dealerships, he instructs two hundred new extra Toyotas. By an economic perspective, his buy of the Nets franchise is: (w) smart marketing str

    		•
  • Q : Explain the positive economic statement

    A positive economic statement is one which: (w) involves scientifically testable predictions. (x) is based upon value judgments. (y) explains the world idealistically. (z) applies primarily to microeconomic data. H

    		•
  • Q : Erroneous analysis LEAST attributable

    The erroneous analysis that economists seldom agree is LEAST attributable to the fact such that economists are: (w) acquire little media coverage while they agree, when disputes about how economic theory must be translated in policy a

    		•
  • Q : Law of diminishing returns The idea

    The idea that costs ultimately grow faster than output if output is expanded obeys logically from the law of: (i) Increasing expectations. (ii) Raising returns to scale. (iii) Diminishing returns. (iv) Demand and supply. (v) Rational effects.

    Q : Behavior of deliberately act in

    Deliberately acting in a way which cannot attain a wanted goal is: (w) rational behavior. (x) random behavior. (y) irrational behavior. (z) maximizing behavior. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regard

    		•
  • Q : When is a good taken as scarce Can

    Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding scarcity in economics generally? A good is taken as scarce when people: (w) lack the funds required to make sure their survival. (x) require

    		•
  • Q : Illustrate new public housing rent free

    Giving new public housing "rent free" to the poor: (i) makes public housing a free good. (ii) involves no opportunity cost. (iii) is the merely way to shelter the homeless. (iv) only transfers costs from one group to the other. Ple

    		•