--%>

Better off and worse off condition in normative economics

When an economic change creates one person better off and a thousand persons worse off, this is: (w) good for society. (x) bad for society. (y) neither good nor bad for society. (z) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding better off and worse off condition in normative economics generally?

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Determine the initial distribution of

    When goods are traded and several families gain without worsening other families' well-being, so in that case the initial distribution of goods should have been: (w) optimal. (x) distributively inefficient. (y) superior to the new dis

  • Q : Decision making and outputs as well as

    Particular decision making and how outputs and prices are determined are the mainly focus of: (w) Occam’s razor (x) microeconomic analysis. (y) macroeconomic theory. (z) economic efficiency Hey friends please give your opinio

  • Q : Define the root of normative economics

    Value judgments which address what “must be” are at the root of: (1) microeconomics. (2) scarcity economics. (3) normative economics. (4) positive economics. (5) macroeconomics. How can

  • Q : Social economics and philosophy

    The early school of social economics and philosophy which strongly emphasized education like a mechanism for social reform were: (i) utilitarians. (ii) physiocrats. (iii) mercantilists. (iv) classical. (v) neoclassical.

    Q : Excessive production as a problem Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Governments which attempt to utilize ‘needs’ or ‘equality’ as the bases for distributing goods are NOT probable to: (1) Encounter extreme production as a problem. (2) R

  • Q : Growth and Development-Production

    The production possibilities curve might be shifted outward by: (1) Decreasing unemployment. (2) Reducing the labor force. (3) Limiting the output of capital goods. (4) Raising the amounts or productivity of the resources.

    Q : When is Self-interest evident How can I

    How can I solve my following problem? Please suggest me the correct answer. Explain reason Self interest is evident while: (i) A mugger utilizes a $1 bullet upon his victim to take $100 by his wallet. (ii) Helen cr

  • Q : When are relative prices serving as

    The behavior on the given list most consistent along with relative prices serving like a rationing device, and not mainly as incentives, would be as: (i) Marcia, a status-seeking social climber that turning down requests of Wayne for dates after seeing small numbers u

  • Q : Comunity engagement and education

    identify the modes employed in the management of comunity ECD programes in your community and explain them in the following lines 1 sole proprietorship and corporation 2 NGO mode 3 donor managed and ommunity owned

  • Q : Explain about the Economic Scarcity

    Economic scarcity: (w) will eventually be removed by technological progress. (x) is synonymous along with an economic shortage. (y) cannot exist within a market economy. (z) will exist as long as human needs exceed the goods we can produce using our r