--%>

Better off and worse off condition in normative economics

When an economic change creates one person better off and a thousand persons worse off, this is: (w) good for society. (x) bad for society. (y) neither good nor bad for society. (z) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding better off and worse off condition in normative economics generally?

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Theory of Smiths - Economic Development

    Theory of economic development by Adam Smith relies upon a ________ to kick-start the process, and subsequently _________ to continue this.  (w) higher wages./ the wages fund. (x) division of labor/ higher wages. (cy) explosive p

  • Q : Issues of normative economic policy

    Economic policy matters are usually: (w) simply resolved by positive analysis alone. (x) normative, but workable solutions based on positive analysis. (y) either strictly macroeconomic, or strictly microeconomic. (z) better resolved using common sense

  • Q : Critical features of Technological

    New services and goods, new forms and types of equipment, and new knowledge regarding how to combine resources productively are all critical features of: (1) entrepreneurial profits. (2) winning the global war against scarcity. (3) net investment with

  • Q : Define problem of restricted resources

    Alex wants a limitless supply of ice cream, flip-flops and candy bars. However, restricted resources and the time needed to produce these staples leaves Alex facing a problem termed as: (i) scarcity. (ii) disappointment. (iii) insufficiency. (v) inadequacy. (v) hunger. Hello guys I want y

  • Q : Combination of land People who seek

    People who seek gains and bear risks and improbability while they combine land, capital and labor in productive ways is: (i) socialists. (ii) sole proprietors. (iii) professional managers. (iv) entrepreneurs. (v) bureaucratic capitalists.

  • Q : Eccentricities of Jeremy Bentham The

    The eccentricities of Jeremy Bentham (from 1748 to 1832) did not comprise: (i) allowing a pet pig to freely roam his mansion. (ii) petitioning the London Council for permission to replace shrubbery beside his driveway along with mummi

  • Q : Uses of positive economic analysis Hey

    Hey friends I need your help for given problem: Positive economic analysis would be least helpful like a guide to how a society can decrease: (w) specific criminal behavior from punishment. (x) inequality within th

  • Q : Nonexistence of economic problems I

    I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion that, when would be Economic problems nonexistent: (v) The world population stopped rising, (w) capitalism were replaced and abolished along with socialism, (x) all human wishe

  • Q : Condition to being a free good Which of

    Which of the given probably comes closest to make a free good: (1) Unexpected warmth through the sun within Chicago in January. (2) A hot school lunch given for a needy student. (3) A microwave pizza bought along with food stamps. (4) Income earned th

  • Q : Argument for infant industries to

    The argument for infant industries must be protected through competition through established foreign industries was first advanced through: (1) Richard List. (2) Gustav Schmoller. (3) David Ricardo. (4) Alexander Hamilton. (5) Thomas Robert Malthus. (6) early mercanti