--%>

Better off and worse off condition in normative economics

When an economic change creates one person better off and a thousand persons worse off, this is: (w) good for society. (x) bad for society. (y) neither good nor bad for society. (z) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding better off and worse off condition in normative economics generally?

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Requirements of Economic Efficiency

    Economic efficiency needs: (w) distributive, productive and allocative efficiency. (x) engineering and dynamic efficiency. (y) historical and sociological efficiency. (z) chemical and physical efficiency. How can I

  • Q : Determine the essence of positive

    The essence of positive economic statements is which they: (1) should be correct, or they turn into normative statements. (2) yield predictions which can be tested for validity. (3) clearly resolve ethical or moral matters. (4) focus upon cheerful in

  • Q : Illustrate new public housing rent free

    Giving new public housing "rent free" to the poor: (i) makes public housing a free good. (ii) involves no opportunity cost. (iii) is the merely way to shelter the homeless. (iv) only transfers costs from one group to the other. Ple

  • Q : Positive declaration in positive

    When a mother tells her young child that thunder is caused by the angels bowling up in heaven, scientists would classify her statement as most clearly: (w) a normative statement. (x) a positive statement. (y) microeconomics in place of macroeconomics. (z) scientifical

  • Q : Price elasticity of demanded in

    The price elasticity of demand is the relative proportional change within the: (1) quantity of a good demanded yielded by a given absolute price change. (2) price generated through a specified change in quantity demanded. (3) quantity of a good demand

  • Q : Validation of a new theory in

    A new theory evolves within common sense only after this is determined: (1) Helpful through extensive testing. (2) Within conformity along with Newtonian mechanics and Occam's razor. (3) To contain relatively only some exceptions. (4) Acceptable through the Institute

  • Q : Explain about the positive technical

    Positive technical statements: (w) need value judgments. (x) should be valid by definition. (y) can be proved and tested or disproved by fact and logic. (z) are the excellent guides in specifying economic policies.

  • Q : Economics as a region of study

    Economics like a region of study largely focuses upon: (1) class, power and status relationships. (2) Government policies to cure poverty. (3) Scarcity and decision making. (4) Accounting and financial relationships. (5) profit-maximizing business strategies.

  • Q : Determine the supply of clothing when

    A pair of possible descriptions for simultaneous transfers of the demand for clothing from D0 to D1 while the supply of clothing transferred from S0 to S1 could be which: (1) unexpectedly cold and frequent blizzards caused M

  • Q : Define the positive economics Please

    Please guys help me to solve out this problem that positive economics, which: (w) is accepted like true through all economists. (x) is less technical than normative economics. (y) involves statements which, when false, could be proven false. (z) addre