--%>

Better off and worse off condition in normative economics

When an economic change creates one person better off and a thousand persons worse off, this is: (w) good for society. (x) bad for society. (y) neither good nor bad for society. (z) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding better off and worse off condition in normative economics generally?

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Problem regarding Property Rights Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the following options. Fee simple rights don’t comprise the right to: (1) Demolish your property. (2) Sell your property. (3) Employ your property for your own advantage. (4) Damage another’s propert

  • Q : Explained economics capital generally

    Where is generally economic capital referred: (1) Money and other financial assets. (2) Machinery, buildings and equipment. (3) Net investment minus depreciation. (4) Corporate bonds and stocks. Can anybody suggest

  • Q : Example of wasted water in inefficiency

    Why do people usually assume that water run on sidewalks and within the street while they water their lawns? Is that wasted water a symbol of inefficiency?

  • Q : Find cigarette taxes testing in

    Positive economic analysis would take in testing a theory which raising cigarette taxes would: (1) harm smokers much more than it helped non-smokers. (2) enhance social welfare by reducing smoking from teenagers. (3) boost cigarette prices and decreas

  • Q : Give an example of Production in

    By using knowledge and/or technology to apply energy to change materials, thereby making the materials more precious is: (w) production. (x) demand. (y) a total cure for scarcity. (z) economically profitable. Can someone clarify/he

  • Q : When is a good taken as scarce Can

    Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding scarcity in economics generally? A good is taken as scarce when people: (w) lack the funds required to make sure their survival. (x) require

  • Q : Define the term Prices in prices and

    Prices are: (w) used to ration free goods and resources. (x) zero for several scarce goods and resources. (y) the merely efficient way to assign luxury goods. (z) one mechanism for rationing scarce goods and resources.

    Q : Problem of macroeconomics in economics

    Can anybody advise me the proper explanation for given problem regarding macroeconomics in Economics generally. In macroeconomics, where we examine all things like the: (w) problems of What, How, and For Whom. (x)

  • Q : Demonstration of scarcity in the U.S.

    By which is scarcity in the U.S. economy demonstrated: (v) The "energy crisis" of the 1970s, (w) Welfare payments to impoverished families, (x) Government budgeting more funding for defence or more for education, (y) Housing shortages in Santa Monica

  • Q : Example of Normative Macroeconomics

    To say that high joblessness rates in this prosperous country are a national disgrace would be an illustration of a: (w) normative macroeconomic statement. (x) positive macroeconomic statement. (y) positive microeconomic statement. (z) normative microeconomic statemen