--%>

Better off and worse off condition in normative economics

When an economic change creates one person better off and a thousand persons worse off, this is: (w) good for society. (x) bad for society. (y) neither good nor bad for society. (z) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding better off and worse off condition in normative economics generally?

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Human rights trump property rights I

    I have a problem in economics on Human rights trump property rights. Please help me in the following question. Loosely translated, the laissez-faire signifies: (i) Control and integrate. (ii) Seize the day. (iii) Human rights trump the property rights

  • Q : Determine gross investment for

    Hey friends please give your view for the problem of investment in Economic that is given below: If a firm buys $50 million worth of new machinery to replace worn out equipment that originally cost $3 million,

  • Q : Problem regarding exceed human

    The fact that human requirements exceed the production possible along with the resources obtainable is termed as economic: (1) scarcity, (2) welfare, (3) shortage and (4) deficits. Can someone please suggest me the

  • Q : Function to organizing productive

    Can someone explain me with best solution regarding problem of organizing productive resource and innovating new products... Organizing another productive resource, innovating new products and production methods, and willingness to

  • Q : Decisions and owns resources The

    The Economic systems are categorized mainly according to: (1) Who makes decisions and who owns the resources. (2) Which political parties are in the power. (3) The extent of economic growth. (4) How efficiently resources are employed.

    Q : Entails of a technical approach to

    A technical approach to economics entail: (1) positive questions since this cannot resolve normative matters. (2) normative questions since this cannot resolve positive matters. (3) positive and normative questions since this can resolve all matters.

  • Q : Illustrate positive economic analysis

    Income tax rates were cut during 1981 year, and again in 2001 year. A question is here that, at least in theory, may be resolved through positive economic analysis is: (w) How do changes in tax rates influence employment and national

  • Q : Problem on Welfare Can someone help me

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the following options. The equal shares criterion of distribution recommends that each and every individual must: (i) Receive income according to necessitate. (ii) Contribute equivalent producti

  • Q : Explain about the term Profits in

    Profits: (w) are interest on human capital. (x) are an unfortunate consequence of capitalism. (y) burden the economy and decrease efficiency. (z) are monetary rewards to entrepreneurs. Can someone explain/help me w

  • Q : Who thought Murderers do more harm than

    Murderers do more harm than shoplifters; therefore they must be punished proportionally more harshly as per the school of thought developed through: (i) medieval scholar Thomas Aquinas. (ii) Chinese leader Mao Zedong. (iii) lawyer and social reformer Jeremy Bentham. (