--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Better off and worse off condition in normative economics

When an economic change creates one person better off and a thousand persons worse off, this is: (w) good for society. (x) bad for society. (y) neither good nor bad for society. (z) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding better off and worse off condition in normative economics generally?

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Behavior of deliberately act in

    Deliberately acting in a way which cannot attain a wanted goal is: (w) rational behavior. (x) random behavior. (y) irrational behavior. (z) maximizing behavior. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regard

    		•
  • Q : Example of wasted water in inefficiency

    Why do people usually assume that water run on sidewalks and within the street while they water their lawns? Is that wasted water a symbol of inefficiency?

    		•
  • Q : When are all resources encompassed All

    All resources are encompassed through the classes of labor: (i) industrial robots, energy, and raw materials. (ii) capital, entrepreneurship, and knowledge. (iii) land, entrepreneurship and capital. (iv) entrepreneurship, investment and materials. (v)

    		•
  • Q : Define positive technical statement on

    A positive technical statement on the subject of college life is which: (1) college deans are more moral than department chairs. (2) elite colleges frequently admit the wrong students. (3) history professors and accounting professors deserve similar pay. (4) on averag

    		•
  • Q : Usefulness of Positive Economics Please

    Please help me to solve the problem that is given below: Positive economics is MOST helpful within finding if: (i) Particular economic goals are good or not. (ii) A set of national goals is desirable. (iii) Specific economic t

    		•
  • Q : When recently develope theory least

    Recently developed theory is least probable to evolve in common sense when this fails to: (i) conform to the principle of Occam’s razor. (ii) be consistent along with extensively-accepted previous theories. (iii) have realistic assumptions. (iv) accurately descr

    		•
  • Q : Determine the supply of clothing when

    A pair of possible descriptions for simultaneous transfers of the demand for clothing from D0 to D1 while the supply of clothing transferred from S0 to S1 could be which: (1) unexpectedly cold and frequent blizzards caused M

    		•
  • Q : Example of distributive efficiency in

    I found a seashell which you would truly like to have, and you determined a coconut that I would truly like to include. Trading your coconut for my seashell would improve: (i) allocative efficiency. (ii) productive efficiency. (iii) distributive efficiency. (iv) quali

    		•
  • Q : Explain about the positive technical

    Positive technical statements: (w) need value judgments. (x) should be valid by definition. (y) can be proved and tested or disproved by fact and logic. (z) are the excellent guides in specifying economic policies.

  • Q : Economist-Conclusion for redistribution

    I want a good answer on the topic of normative economics. Please give me your opinion that if wealth and income both were redistributed by the richest one to the poorest five percent of the population, conclusion of an economist would be that: (w) soc

    		•