--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Better off and worse off condition in normative economics

When an economic change creates one person better off and a thousand persons worse off, this is: (w) good for society. (x) bad for society. (y) neither good nor bad for society. (z) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding better off and worse off condition in normative economics generally?

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Explain about the positive technical

    Positive technical statements: (w) need value judgments. (x) should be valid by definition. (y) can be proved and tested or disproved by fact and logic. (z) are the excellent guides in specifying economic policies.

  • Q : Occurrence of good or service scarce in

    A good or service is scarce when people: (w) would benefit from its reduction. (x) wish more than the amounts freely obtainable. (y) cannot enjoy this simultaneously. (z) can freely consume all they want.

    Q : Causes of an increment in the price of

    Please help me to solve the problem of price that is given below: A raise within the price of bread would: (i) Reasons more wheat to utilize to bake bread. (ii) Encourage more people to eat bread. (iii) Discourage

    		•
  • Q : Effects of bankrupted causing prices to

    A predictable result when a drought bankrupted several watermelon farmers would be as: (w) a decline into the price of watermelons. (x) increased demand since watermelons will be scarcer. (y) reduced supply, causing prices to increase. (z) decreased demand due to high

    		•
  • Q : Using knowledge for applying energy to

    I want a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion that using knowledge for applying energy to create materials more valuable is termed as: (i) Economic profit, (ii) Innovation, (iii) Servicing, (iv) production and&

    		•
  • Q : When is Scarcity a problem become

    Scarcity is a problem for: (w) poor countries merely. (x) individuals only when they are poor. (y) capitalists, but not socialists. (z) all people and countries, rich and poor alike. Can someone explain/help me wit

    		•
  • Q : Define economic assumption of

    As per the economic assumption of rationality, there people: (w) always behave with ideal rationality. (x) never behave in erratic or random ways. (y) tend to make decisions consistent along with their goals. (z) foresee completely the effects of thei

    		•
  • Q : Fee-simple property rights I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Fee-simple property rights. Please help me in the following question. Fee-simple property rights are a broad division of: (i) Common law. (ii) Positive externalities. (iii) Negative externalities. (iv) Public property

    		•
  • Q : The closest illustration of a free good

    Which would be the closest illustration of a free good: (1) A can of tuna bought along with food stamps, (2) dead leaves which require raking into fall, (3) water through a drinking fountain at a park, (4) a sample of soap acquired in the mail and (5)

    		•
  • Q : Socialism-ownership of non-human

    Can someone please help me in finding out the right answer from the following question. A faith that most of the nonhuman resources must be owned, not by the private individuals, however instead ‘by everyone’ in common, with the govt. as t

    		•