--%>

Better off and worse off condition in normative economics

When an economic change creates one person better off and a thousand persons worse off, this is: (w) good for society. (x) bad for society. (y) neither good nor bad for society. (z) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding better off and worse off condition in normative economics generally?

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Ownership of major non-labor resources

    I have a problem in economics on Ownership of major non-labor resources. Please help me in the following question. Government ownership of main non-labor resources is the characteristic of: (1) Capitalism. (2) Decentralization. (3) Anarchism. (4) Soci

  • Q : Basic economic questions NOT included

    The three basic economic questions do NOT include: (w) What?, (x) For whom?, (y) Where? and (z) How? Can someone explain me with about above problem of fundamental economic concept...

  • Q : Explain about the positive economic

    Positive economic statements: (1) are factual and can never be wrong. (2) predict political viewpoints. (3) are attempts to explain economic relationships. (4) estimate the fairness of social programs. (5) can resolve the matter of equity.

  • Q : Quantity theory of money David Hume and

    David Hume and John Locke summarized an early version of: (1) the circular flow of income. (2) the permanent income hypothesis. (3) the quantity theory of money. (4) the marginal disutility of poverty. (5) the backward-bending supply

  • Q : Determine desirable items without

    Desirable items without opportunity costs are termed as: (i) free goods. (ii) economic goods. (iii) capital goods. (iv) financial goods. (v) gifts of nature. Hey friends please give your view for the problem of opportunity

  • Q : Perceptions about equity and need

    Government often bases decisions regarding distributions of income and output on: (i) unemployment and Inflation. (ii) Positive economic theories. (iii) Perceptions regarding equity and need. (iv) Market demands and supplies. Can s

  • Q : Determine the essence of positive

    The essence of positive economic statements is which they: (1) should be correct, or they turn into normative statements. (2) yield predictions which can be tested for validity. (3) clearly resolve ethical or moral matters. (4) focus upon cheerful in

  • Q : Achieving economic welfare For any

    For any given point on the production possibilities (or PPF) curve: (i) More economic welfare is achieved than from any points within the PPF. (ii) Moving to some other output combination should yield enhanced economic welfare. (iii) More of some good can be generated

  • Q : Unregulated market competition in

    Adam Smith’s well-known reference to an “invisible hand” implies that: (w) unregulated market competition improves economic welfare. (x) government must closely regulate monopolies. (y) pure competition is a divinely motivated market

  • Q : Validation of a new theory in

    A new theory evolves within common sense only after this is determined: (1) Helpful through extensive testing. (2) Within conformity along with Newtonian mechanics and Occam's razor. (3) To contain relatively only some exceptions. (4) Acceptable through the Institute