--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Better off and worse off condition in normative economics

When an economic change creates one person better off and a thousand persons worse off, this is: (w) good for society. (x) bad for society. (y) neither good nor bad for society. (z) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding better off and worse off condition in normative economics generally?

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : People thinking about invisible hand of

    Adam Smith’s “invisible hand” consider as to a process through which people think: (w) trying to serve their own interests also exploit social well being. (x) rely upon democratic governments to make main economic decisions. (y) base

    		•
  • Q : What is made by a progarm I need a good

    I need a good answer on the topic of scarcity economic problems. Please give me your suggestion that program, which gives health care at no charge to patients would create: (w) top quality health care obtainable to somebody. (x) health care a free goo

    		•
  • Q : Relationship between the price level

    David Hume’s observations regarding the relationship between the price level and money supply are termed as: (w) Price Specie-Flow Mechanism. (x) Law of Comparative Advantage. (y) Law of Absolute Advantage. (z) Laissez Faire.

    		•
  • Q : Economic goals of all economic activity

    Adam Smith believed about the ultimate suitable objective of all economic activity is to maximizing: (w) wealth and power of the national government. (x) satisfaction of individuals by giving people along with the goods they want. (y) employment oppor

    		•
  • Q : Problem of Slavery and Normative

    Please guys help me to solve the problem of Slavery and Normative Economics that is given below: Slavery like a mechanism for allocating labor previous to the Civil War eventually proved to be in conflict along wit

    		•
  • Q : Better off with less in economic

    Anything of that people would be better off with less is which from given issue: (1) economic surplus, (2) external cost, (3) economic bad and (4) adverse consequence. Hello guys I need your advice. Please recommend some idea for a

    		•
  • Q : Example of distributive efficiency in

    I found a seashell which you would truly like to have, and you determined a coconut that I would truly like to include. Trading your coconut for my seashell would improve: (i) allocative efficiency. (ii) productive efficiency. (iii) distributive efficiency. (iv) quali

    		•
  • Q : Founder of utilitarianism Jeremy

    Jeremy Bentham [from 1748 to 1832] was: (1) the owner of a pet pig he permitted to roam by his mansion. (2) the founder of utilitarianism. (3) appointed to the Board of Trustees of the University of London, and keeps on the Board today. (4) stuffed an

    		•
  • Q : When economists disagree in normative

    Can someone give details with best solution about problem of normative economics... Economists disagree MOST often about regions involving: (i) normative economics, while value judgments are involved. (ii) explanat

    		•
  • Q : Fundamental categories for economic

    The four fundamental categories for economic resources are: (w) matter, energy, technology and information. (x) wages, rent, interest and profits. (y) land, labor, capital and entrepreneurship. (z) machinery, energy, workers and government.