--%>

Better off and worse off condition in normative economics

When an economic change creates one person better off and a thousand persons worse off, this is: (w) good for society. (x) bad for society. (y) neither good nor bad for society. (z) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding better off and worse off condition in normative economics generally?

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Explain invisible hand of Adam Smith

    The “invisible hand” of Adam Smith described: (w) a large role for the government. (x) altruist motives in civilized society. (y) technological advances promoted throguh monopolies. (z) self-correcting market mechanisms.

  • Q : Limitation of resource category of

    I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion that the economists’ resource category of “land” would not contain: (1) coal, petroleum, and other minerals. (2) the fish and water within the oce

  • Q : Socialism of nonhuman resources The

    The system in which the government acts as the trustee for all members of society by owning most of the nonhuman resources is: (1) The market system. (2) Capitalism. (3) Decentralized (4). Socialism. Can someone please help me in f

  • Q : Consumption and investment The

    The economy's present production possibilities frontier is not restricted by the: (1) Quantity and quality of labor force. (2) Amount of capital stock currently accessible. (3) Quantity and quality of the natural resources (that is, land). (4) Current

  • Q : Quantity theory of money David Hume and

    David Hume and John Locke summarized an early version of: (1) the circular flow of income. (2) the permanent income hypothesis. (3) the quantity theory of money. (4) the marginal disutility of poverty. (5) the backward-bending supply

  • Q : Law of diminishing returns The idea

    The idea that costs ultimately grow faster than output if output is expanded obeys logically from the law of: (i) Increasing expectations. (ii) Raising returns to scale. (iii) Diminishing returns. (iv) Demand and supply. (v) Rational effects.

    Q : Limits of Technological Advances

    Technological advances would not comprise: (i) Native Americans demonstrating Pilgrims how crops grow faster when rotten fish are dropped within with seeds they plant. (ii) pouring coffee through a coffee pot you obtained as a birthday gift. (iii) new

  • Q : Punishment must fir to crime by Jeremy

    In words of Jeremy Bentham, punishment for a particular committing a wrong against society must be: (i) decided by a jury of the person’s peers. (ii) depends on the individual’s intentions. (iii) depends on the criminal’s position in

  • Q : Explain economic concept of scarcity in

    Can someone explain/help me with best solution about problem of economic concept of scarcity... By which economic concept of scarcity is explained in a simple fashion: (w) Our natural resources are running out. (x) Particular goods (vintage wines and rare

  • Q : Explain statement of normative

    Please help me to solve the problem of normative economics that is given below: Normative economic hypotheses would contain the statement which: (i) Earth consist of five moons composed of blue che