Attractiveness of focused low-cost differentiation strategy
When is a focused low-cost or concentrated differentiation strategy more attractive?
Expert
Focused low-cost or concentrated differentiation strategies more attractive when following condition are meeting as given below:
a. The target niche is bulky enough to be cost-effective and offers good growth potential.
b. Industry leaders do not observe that having a attendance in the niche is crucial to their personal success.
c. It is expensive or hard for multi-segment competitors to situate capabilities in place to meet specialized requirements of the target market niche and at the similar time satisfy the expectations of their mainstream consumers.
d. The industry has lots of different and sections.
e. Few, if any, other rivals are attempting to specialize in the similar target section.
f. The focuser can fight effectively against the challengers based on the resources and capabilities it has to serve up the targeted niche and the consumer goodwill it may have built up.
What did Whirlpool do to continue the price savings and productivity gains derived by its execution of Six Sigma?
Can you state me a time when you provided an excellent customer service? Briefly state it.
Illustrates the Weighing the Cons and Pros of Vertical Integration?
What are the Vertical integration disadvantages?
Illustrates about strategies for competing in the fragmented industries?
Explain in brief the various components of the term marketing mix.
Illustrates the schemes to capitalize on competitor weaknesses?
What do you understand by the term product which is the component of marketing mix?
When is a backward integration decrease cost?
What do you understand by the word span of control?
18,76,764
1937953 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1433121
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!