--%>

Allocative Mechanisms-Random Selection

I have a problem in economics on Random Selection. Please help me in the following question. Rights to drill for the oil on government property are frequently assigned by lottery. If you are blessed you win drilling rights by just submitting your name. This is an illustration of: (i) Central planning. (ii) Random selection. (iii) Queuing. (iv) Arbitration.

   Related Questions in Econometrics

  • Q : Income Distribution-Distributing goods

    Distributing all the goods strictly according to people's requirements is likely to outcome in: (i) the requirements of decision makers receiving much high priority. (ii) Low levels of output since people contain few incentives to generate. (iii) A fe

  • Q : Discuss everyday forms of peasant

    discuss everyday forms of peasant resistance in mughal india

  • Q : Expanding the Diminishing Returns Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The law of diminishing returns refers to the rising: (1) Complexities encountered in expanding any activity continually. (2) Reductions in the costs from expanding big scale p

  • Q : Diminishing Returns-Bow out Whenever

    Whenever the law of diminishing returns applies to the production processes, then the associated production possibilities frontier should: (1) Produce reducing costs as output grows. (2) Bow in (that is, be convex) from the origin. (3) Be a rectangular hyperbola. (4)

  • Q : Diminishing Returns for different kinds

    The Standard economic suppositions recommend that the production possibilities frontiers are concave from beneath [from origin] mainly because: (i) People desire additional units of a good less the more of good they encompass. (ii) The relative produc

  • Q : Expansion of the ability to produce

    Decreasing consumer goods output to generate more capital goods this year will outcome: (i) Slower growth of economy's future prolific capacity. (ii) Rapid expansion of the capability to produce in the future. (iii) No consequence on the future capaci

  • Q : Illustration of the difference in

    In a current Wendy’s TV commercial, a police officer hands a driver a speeding ticket for $75. The response of driver is something to the consequence of as, “Oh gentleman! 75 crispy chicken nuggets!” The response of driver is mainly specific an illus

  • Q : Outward shift of production

    The raise in the quantity of labor for society shown would lead to: (1) An inward shift of the production possibilities frontier. (2) The movement all along the production possibilities frontier. (3) An increased opportunity cost for all the goods. (4

  • Q : Economics “Due to lower grain prices,

    “Due to lower grain prices, consumers can expect retail prices of choice beef to begin dropping slightly this spring with pork becoming cheaper after midsummer,” the Agriculture Department predicted. “This reflects increasing supply,” the department said. Does the statement use the term “supply” cor

  • Q : Allocative Mechanisms-Brute Force I

    I have a problem in economics on Allocative Mechanisms. Please help me in the following question. Timmy gives Butch his lunch money every day to keep Butch from giving Timmy black eyes, swirly, and atomic wedgies. Butch preferred allocative mechanism