Affect in cost when remove phases
How does the defect affect a cost if we remove them in later phases rather than initial phase?
Expert
If a defect is recognized at the early phase then it must be removed during that phase itself rather than removing them in some later stage. It is a fact that if a defect is postponed for later stage it proves more costly. A defect if recognized and removed during the early stage like requirement and design stage it will be more cost effective, whereas a defect removed at the time of maintenance is 20 times costlier than if we removed the defects in the requirement and design phases. For example, if a defect is recognized during requirement and design phase we only require to modify the documentation, but if recognized at the time of maintenance stage we not only need to remove the defect, although we also have to alter our test plans, perform regression testing, and modify all documentations. That is why a defect must be recognized /removed in former stages. The testing department must be involved right from the requirement stage and not after the execution stage.
What are the different testing activities? Briefly describe it.
Is it compulsory to do testing after completion of the build and execution phases?
Specify the various categories of the defects?
Abbreviate the term ERD? Also illustrate its definition in brief?
What do you mean by the term Requirement Engineering?
Briefly describe all the name of metrics which is computed throughout error tracking activity?
Illustrate the difference between Activity and Sequence Diagram.
Specify the metrics to specify the non functional requirements?
Explain about the black box testing and the white box testing?
For software testing which group of teams is used?
18,76,764
1930142 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1444910
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!